Should there be a limit on amount of threads? (80)
trish123: I understand how frustrating it can be but think we have enough rules and regulations to live by.
Sometimes it simply takes pointing the finer points of netiquette out to a person
Even if a post does only get a few replies it doesnt make it worthless - and besides, who are we to judge the worth - if you dont want to reply, fine nobody forces you to - but at the ned of the day, its different strokes for different folks
Sometimes it simply takes pointing the finer points of netiquette out to a person
Even if a post does only get a few replies it doesnt make it worthless - and besides, who are we to judge the worth - if you dont want to reply, fine nobody forces you to - but at the ned of the day, its different strokes for different folks
Sorry to rant!
say something to that one person just starts a war, But is not right that we have to go to the 2,3,4,5 th pages to read a thread because the entire first page in filled by one person posting 20 threads.
"who are we to judge the worth " YOU ARE RIGHT!
rasgumby: Sorry to rant!
say something to that one person just starts a war, But is not right that we have to go to the 2,3,4,5 th pages to read a thread because the entire first page in filled by one person posting 20 threads.
"who are we to judge the worth " YOU ARE RIGHT!
say something to that one person just starts a war, But is not right that we have to go to the 2,3,4,5 th pages to read a thread because the entire first page in filled by one person posting 20 threads.
"who are we to judge the worth " YOU ARE RIGHT!
we are all entitled to a good ole rant my friend - its only what I am doing by letting myself get so involved in this thread I lost count of the number of threads on the first three pages when I signed in this morning - but getting mad about it only provokes a likewise response and makes people dig their heels in even further - I think we will see an improvement now though - and if not I will be asking the mods for an 'eat my words' emoticon
trish123: we are all entitled to a good ole rant my friend - its only what I am doing by letting myself get so involved in this thread
I lost count of the number of threads on the first three pages when I signed in this morning - but getting mad about it only provokes a likewise response and makes people dig their heels in even further - I think we will see an improvement now though - and if not I will be asking the mods for an 'eat my words' emoticon
I lost count of the number of threads on the first three pages when I signed in this morning - but getting mad about it only provokes a likewise response and makes people dig their heels in even further - I think we will see an improvement now though - and if not I will be asking the mods for an 'eat my words' emoticon
"'eat my words' emoticon "Do we need more
Iritaded and mad 2 dif things. I don't get mad,, I just wear high heels when Im here, That way my foot wont go completely under the sand,
( NO- NOT A DRESS TO)
For what its worth, i think tha a limit
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
bodleing: For what its worth, i think tha a limit
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
I agree there
thats a fair limit imo You mean we havent run out questions yet?
arabella: I think everyone should have a fair number but that number should be set and governed by the Moderators.
That way, they can prevent "flooding" by individuals who are posting just to be irritating or to dominate the threads.
That way, they can prevent "flooding" by individuals who are posting just to be irritating or to dominate the threads.
Truthfully I would like to know exactly who this part is and why he is able to do what it is he does and still manage to hang out around here.
....
starliteisbrite: Truthfully I would like to know exactly who this part is and why he is able to do what it is he does and still manage to hang out around here.
....
....
Should read
...who this party is
..
starliteisbrite: Truthfully I would like to know exactly who this part is and why he is able to do what it is he does and still manage to hang out around here.
....
....
I asked and my questions were never answered....so I figure that some members have friends in high places.
Or maybe the rules are not the same for everybody
But we are all free to come and go, post or don't post, read or ignore that which is of no interest.
No, I do not think there should be a limit.
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
And as Lorraine said, the next thing would be controlling content.
I find postings for purposes of insulting people or disrupting the forum obnoxious and annoying, and it is depressing to log in, see nothing I feel like reading or replying to and log out again.
However I feel that about the topics of the threads as well as about multiple threads by those too insensitive or uncaring or egocentric to take others peoples' needs into consideration.
That said, why should any one stop posting threads when other members keep them alive?
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
And as Lorraine said, the next thing would be controlling content.
I find postings for purposes of insulting people or disrupting the forum obnoxious and annoying, and it is depressing to log in, see nothing I feel like reading or replying to and log out again.
However I feel that about the topics of the threads as well as about multiple threads by those too insensitive or uncaring or egocentric to take others peoples' needs into consideration.
That said, why should any one stop posting threads when other members keep them alive?
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
at least 16 poems in a row would give us food for thought rather than food for irritation - bring it on BB 
bajanblue: No, I do not think there should be a limit.
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
And as Lorraine said, the next thing would be controlling content.
I find postings for purposes of insulting people or disrupting the forum obnoxious and annoying, and it is depressing to log in, see nothing I feel like reading or replying to and log out again.
However I feel that about the topics of the threads as well as about multiple threads by those too insensitive or uncaring or egocentric to take others peoples' needs into consideration.
That said, why should any one stop posting threads when other members keep them alive?
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
And as Lorraine said, the next thing would be controlling content.
I find postings for purposes of insulting people or disrupting the forum obnoxious and annoying, and it is depressing to log in, see nothing I feel like reading or replying to and log out again.
However I feel that about the topics of the threads as well as about multiple threads by those too insensitive or uncaring or egocentric to take others peoples' needs into consideration.
That said, why should any one stop posting threads when other members keep them alive?
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
On reflection, i think i agree with this post
thats a nice idea trish but unfair to her
i think anyone annoyed should report and say why
at whatever limit they feel that day regarding the person
doesnt it say something in the rules about
flooding with threads or thread titles that are not allowed?
those would be simple to report on-in the rules,
mods dont have to make a judgement call-clean for everyone
besides to impose a limit of any amount on each member
would take so much technical input and maintenance by mods-
new people joining forums-
those getting around the limit by starting new profiles...
it would not be practical or fair to them-(MODS)
and this is ideally a 'turn-key operation'
why should they have to do that work for no money?
i would like to say tho
its really hot how graham can be swayed w/ reasonable ease and effort
i think anyone annoyed should report and say why
at whatever limit they feel that day regarding the person
doesnt it say something in the rules about
flooding with threads or thread titles that are not allowed?
those would be simple to report on-in the rules,
mods dont have to make a judgement call-clean for everyone
besides to impose a limit of any amount on each member
would take so much technical input and maintenance by mods-
new people joining forums-
those getting around the limit by starting new profiles...
it would not be practical or fair to them-(MODS)
and this is ideally a 'turn-key operation'
why should they have to do that work for no money?
i would like to say tho
its really hot how graham can be swayed w/ reasonable ease and effort
i think innocent is smarter, funnier and cooler than is recognized yet
but sweetie, w/o the nuts-CS would be nothing
(present company included)
also, it was, fyi
49 to 51 percent
i just voted now its 5050
but sweetie, w/o the nuts-CS would be nothing
(present company included)
also, it was, fyi
49 to 51 percent
i just voted now its 5050
bodleing: Should there be a limit on the amount of threads
a person can post each day?
If so, maybe you could suggest what that limit
should be set at.
a person can post each day?
If so, maybe you could suggest what that limit
should be set at.
No it should not be regulated...
Its the beauty of this site... its a living being.
The enterprise never interfered with a new life form and neither should we.
At least I am capable to find the threads that interest me, arnt you (plural - meaning all of a differning opinion)?
mindfful: thats a nice idea trish but unfair to her
but her choice to do so if she wishes - but BB would never be so conceited so no probs 
can't believe it toobajanblue: No, I do not think there should be a limit.
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
We would be asking the Mods to assert discipline over us instead of exerting self discipline and IGNORING the threads
CLEVER POSTING
bajanblue: And as Lorraine said, the next thing would be controlling content.
YEP!!!!!!!! bajanblue:
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
And if I ever feel like posting sixteen poems in a row I want to be able to do it!
EXACTLY this spells ====> FREEDOM
innocentkid: yes.....i also saw that and i really with you.
we all must be well united and must make a complain against these types of nuts and their behaviours.
and we must tell them to make new rules too....
we all must be well united and must make a complain against these types of nuts and their behaviours.
and we must tell them to make new rules too....
Really, you're going to report yourself?
Isn't that noble of you
bodleing: For what its worth, i think tha a limit
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
of ten threads per day would not
restict most of us in any way.
It would nevertheless restict the
odd clowns that turn up from time
to time bombarding us with endless
threads however well meaning.
JMO
hey babe hope ur well xI agrree with u on this one
babsxarabella: Really, you're going to report yourself?
Isn't that noble of you
Isn't that noble of you
bella dont be a cynic
people can grow and change
i think after hangin around a bit
and wanting to stay
sometimes our motives and behaviors change
and besides
in the name of what i am always shouting about
(personal responsibility)
i actually have reported myself-once that i can think of
oh and hi sweetie
mindfful: bella dont be a cynic
people can grow and change
i think after hangin around a bit
and wanting to stay
sometimes our motives and behaviors change
and besides
in the name of what i am always shouting about
(personal responsibility)
i actually have reported myself-once that i can think of
oh and hi sweetie
people can grow and change
i think after hangin around a bit
and wanting to stay
sometimes our motives and behaviors change
and besides
in the name of what i am always shouting about
(personal responsibility)
i actually have reported myself-once that i can think of
oh and hi sweetie
Hi babe xxx
mindfful: thats a nice idea trish but unfair to her
i think anyone annoyed should report and say why
at whatever limit they feel that day regarding the person
doesnt it say something in the rules about
flooding with threads or thread titles that are not allowed?
those would be simple to report on-in the rules,
mods dont have to make a judgement call-clean for everyone
besides to impose a limit of any amount on each member
would take so much technical input and maintenance by mods-
new people joining forums-
those getting around the limit by starting new profiles...
it would not be practical or fair to them-(MODS)
and this is ideally a 'turn-key operation'
why should they have to do that work for no money?
i would like to say tho
its really hot how graham can be swayed w/ reasonable ease and effort
i think anyone annoyed should report and say why
at whatever limit they feel that day regarding the person
doesnt it say something in the rules about
flooding with threads or thread titles that are not allowed?
those would be simple to report on-in the rules,
mods dont have to make a judgement call-clean for everyone
besides to impose a limit of any amount on each member
would take so much technical input and maintenance by mods-
new people joining forums-
those getting around the limit by starting new profiles...
it would not be practical or fair to them-(MODS)
and this is ideally a 'turn-key operation'
why should they have to do that work for no money?
i would like to say tho
its really hot how graham can be swayed w/ reasonable ease and effort
Oh i've not been swayed that much MF
It was just something i was pondering
this morning without any real conviction
one way or the other.
Anyway its a bit out of character for me
to be asking for more rules.
I seem to have spent most of my life
breaking them.
mindfful: bella dont be a cynic
people can grow and change
i think after hangin around a bit
and wanting to stay
sometimes our motives and behaviors change
and besides
in the name of what i am always shouting about
(personal responsibility)
i actually have reported myself-once that i can think of
oh and hi sweetie
people can grow and change
i think after hangin around a bit
and wanting to stay
sometimes our motives and behaviors change
and besides
in the name of what i am always shouting about
(personal responsibility)
i actually have reported myself-once that i can think of
oh and hi sweetie
OK, so I see he is growing as I type this.....
arabella: OK, so I see he is growing as I type this.....
I think all the 'no replies' say it all really
People are still feeding the Puppy.
That's a way to get nipped!!!!
That's a way to get nipped!!!!
trish123: I think all the 'no replies' say it all really
hi....i was trying to post some pictures.but now here we can only post one picture. it's only with the starting of the thread. so i had to start some testing threads. SORRY TRISH ...FOR THE INCONVINIENCE..!
Conrad73: People are still feeding the Puppy.
That's a way to get nipped!!!!
That's a way to get nipped!!!!
I think there should be a limit amount of time one should be logged in daily.
More Threads
Sleepy Don!
your personality
other can see but not you
Unions support Democrats!
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
the way you look
Feel Good Music
men's perspective towards women
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
The Best of the GOP
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
to crack a 'nut'
By the way, i love gilly's threads also, well most
of them.
I really like Gillys posts too jb and Gra but this time he isnt the offender - I did write to the person in question and have had a nice letter back apologising - so we will see..........