Nope not going there. Just remember if the CS gods had thought this poll/thread was against the rules they would have made it go to the dustbin soon after posting it.
again not your problem Some people want to be free and others want to take it away. Again I don't condone torture of any kind and am embarrassed of my government for what they may have done. But to openly accuse the very people who are actually looking out for Manning's health and welfare of torture is not gonna fly.
Ah a limey (no offense) Is trying to school Americans on the Constitution. I do believe the President Is a Self professed Constitutional Scholar. I firmly believe I know more about it than him.
Just for your information. The Constitution is the document that places limits on the government not on the people. Every president from Lincoln on has ignored it to one extent or another.
The constitution guarantees freedom. What you do with it is a whole other ball game.
No this thread was used to accuse people of torture. Plain and simple. I have no delusions that our government is capable of it and has in the past. So has every other government in the history of the world. The Constitution was used as toilet paper by this admin just as those before. Just think Obama Care. That is more unconstitutional than Manning being held on charges of espionage.
He could have and deserted if he had principles of thinking it was illegal to go. He chose to go and that being a conscience decision he invalidated the right to say it was an illegal order. He new what he was doing and did it willfully. Period. He want's the spotlight and were not gonna give it to him.
885. ART. 85. DESERTION (a) Any member of the armed forces who-- (1) without authority goes or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to remain away therefrom permanently; (2) quits his unit, organization, or place of duty with intent to avoid hazardous duty or to shirk important service; or (3) without being regularly separated from one of the armed forces enlists or accepts an appointment in the same or another on of the armed forces without fully disclosing the fact that he has not been regularly separated, or enters any foreign armed service except when authorized by the United States; is guilty of desertion. (b) Any commissioned officer of the armed forces who, after tender of his resignation and before notice of its acceptance, quits his post or proper duties without leave and with intent to remain away therefrom permanently is guilty of desertion. (c) Any person found guilty of desertion or attempt to desert shall be punished, if the offense is committed in time of war, by death or such other punishment as a court-martial may direct, but if the desertion or attempt to desert occurs at any other time, by such punishment, other than death, as a court-martial may direct.
866. ART. 86. ABSENCE WITHOUT LEAVE Any member of the armed forces who, without authority-- (1) fails to go to his appointed place of duty at the time prescribed; (2) goes from that place; or (3) absents himself or remains absent from his unit, organization, or place of duty at which he is required to be at the time prescribed; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
887. ART. 87. MISSING MOVEMENT Any person subject to this chapter who through neglect or design misses the movement of a ship, aircraft, or unit with which he is required in the course of duty to move shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
892. ART. 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION Any person subject to this chapter who-- (1) violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation; (2) having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by any member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or (3) is derelict in the performance of his duties; shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
Yeah no need in having a bachelors degree if all you can do is draw welfare and watch tv because of no jobs. Not every one need's more than a High school education.
The Suez Crisis, also referred to as the Tripartite Aggression, (Arabic: ???? ?????? - ??????? ???????? ?Azmat al-Suwais/Al-?Idwan al-Thalathi; French: Crise du canal de Suez; Hebrew: ???? ???? Mivtza' Kadesh "Operation Kadesh," or ????? ???? Milhemet Sinai, "Sinai War") was a war fought by Britain, France, and Israel against Egypt beginning on 29 October 1956.
The attack followed Egypt's decision of 26 July 1956 to nationalize the Suez Canal, after the withdrawal of an offer by Britain and the United States to fund the building of the Aswan Dam, which was partly in response to Egypt recognizing the People's Republic of China during the height of tensions between China and Taiwan. Britain and France were also strongly opposed to Nasser's plan to annex the Sudan.
The three allies, especially Israel, were mainly successful in attaining their immediate military objectives, but pressure from the United States and the USSR at the United Nations and elsewhere forced them to withdraw. Britain and France completely failed in their political and strategic aim of controlling the canal. Israel fulfilled some of its objectives, attaining the freedom of navigation through the Straits of Tiran and the pacification of the Egyptian-Israeli border through UNEF.
Actractorguy Forum Posts (2,089)
pulled an all niter for the team later.
Are you tired of matchbox's questions
Nope not going there. Just remember if the CS gods had thought this poll/thread was against the rules they would have made it go to the dustbin soon after posting it.