You need rude people sometimes because sometimes the group is insane and someone has to say something. It was cheery and nice people whom don't like to upset the group that loaded the trains to Auschwitz. And in Orwell's 1984 it is these people that shouted the slogans loudest during hate week.
I'm suspicious of those that are content with the group no matter what the group does. I'm suspicious of all those that won't judge because they won't blink an eye whether it's turning the planet into a dust bowl or exterminating Jews.
Of the 1.3 million jobs created in the last 12 months, some 90 percent have gone to men, according to a report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women have gained just 149,000 jobs.
There's no room for western women, and what they like to do, in a real economy. You've been living a dream paid for by murde... no need to go on and on about it. Anyway, if women want to work in the future it will have to be in a factory or on a field or employed in the wiping of arseholes... The kitchen sink is not so unappealing when the alternative is getting a real job.
The English are sort of cold in the sense of being emotionally conservative.
The cavalier/southern/wealthy Englishman keep his emotions to himself - the stiff upper lip traditionally associated with the English. And the roundhead/northern/common Englishman has this way of talking about the most negative and dour things as though they were the most natural thing in the world - he'll even exaggerate how bad things are for the sake of laugh and he is never happier until you tell him that he is doomed. These are our two different faces of emotional conservatism.
Russians are icy as anything until you get to know them, similar story for the Ukrainians.
The Chinese aren't cold as such - alien is the better word - they can be very hospitable, but it's like they've all been lobotomised in some way. Even the imported ones we've grown here struggle to attain any dimensions to their personality.
To act in such a way that makes some part of you live on. Having kids is the main one of these.
The fact that people choose happiness says it all. How can there be a future for civilisation if the people prize their own happiness above their duty to tomorrow, life and the continuation of the species? How can generations be decent when the parent cares more about the parent than the child? How can an economy last when its workers are out for the quick and easy buck and few do a real job? Polls like this demonstrate why we are where we are today.
The people are right to be paranoid. I think we need to focus less on how confident we are, and more on where that confidence comes from. Our time as rulers of the world is coming to an end, and for the first time in 60+ years we are going to have to earn our sense of confidence.
Respite from recession is a better way of looking at it. You/we are still running on emergency interest rates and our economies are not really growing in any of the ways that clever people said they'd need to. For the most part our economies are shaping up to be what we had before the recession.
And besides, there's been an increase in domestic demand because people have realised that we're living through a slow death and that civilisation is not going to end tomorrow, so they've started spending their savings. People are relaxing into the squeeze, but there is little real growth.
A woman doesn't doubt based on the rational evidence, she doubts because of her feelings, the next man could be twice as shady and dishonest as you are, but if he hits those other areas then it won't matter. She will rationalise her own reasons for doing what it is she wants, which in this case would be trusting the untrustable. This is why women have such similar complaints about caddish men, because they choose these men, they want these men.
And the very same nice guys, white knights and orbiters that were sidelined by women when they were young make excuses for and pedestalise women for the rest of their lives never once grasping what they are dealing with and eternally blaming, as the losers amongst women do, the "bad" men in their lives. He believes, as he always believed, that sycophancy is the way to a woman's heart. But he is wrong. He is the nauseating friendzone dullard who she wouldn't ride in her most desperate of moments.
Get out and about. They so often have these eyes that are never one colour and it's often a weird yet pleasing mish-mash of hazelly green. Of course, some will have pretty weird eyes anyway, but just look at how these are concentrated amongst the Jews.
But it is easier for me to notice. Manchester has the second greatest number of Jews in the UK(the UK has the second largest population of Jews in Europe). And I may be mistaken, but for its size I believe that Manchester has more Jews than anywhere in Europe. They live mostly in a part of town called Prestwich, which is right next to where all the Muslims have moved to and are breeding like rabbits. I find this both horrifying and hilarious, it's difficult to express both emotions at once.
Still true, tho. They really do have nicer eyes and I tag that on at the end, partly because there's some truth in it, but mostly because of my inability to give a straight up compliment to anyone or anything.
I myself even have these Jewish eyes. And with the look of my Dad and that uber-intelligent cynicism that permeates the entire paternal side of the family, I woudn't be surprised if my own ancestry has been brushed with the Levant.
And moving on from trust. If you're cool, funny or interesting then you can be somewhat apart from the group without being really hated them, or, they will at least see some good in you at times. Whereas if you go to the extreme of cloaking everything you believe in just to fit in then it means that you are likely to be characterless, talentless and bland underneath it all.
Exactly. It's an inherent slur on your integrity if you either morph your beliefs for social advantage, or, cloak your beliefs for social advantage. It says of a person that their ambition or desire to be liked far outranks their sense of principle - I.e. they are a charlatan.
Everybody you trust has to be honest with you, but not everybody honest is worthy of your trust. Shameless people can be perfectly honest about the terrible things they do.
Having said this, I find that I usually trust the brash and the sometimes offensive more often than not because I admire their honesty and purity. And the eyes and ears will always be bad witnesses to men having rude souls.
Naa, this is a terrible place for actually meeting people. On a different site I've had more more dates in a week than I've had in all the time I've been on here(a wrist-slitting three years!). My advice is try elsewhere, you're really not the problem.
I agree. One does by religion or philosophy what others only do by force of law. And an atheist, or indeed, any society can never breed a generation of philosophers. Therefore, in an Atheist society the social peace exists solely because of the law.
Take one hundred cosmopolitan atheists, remove the law and create a shortage of resouces and I'd give it a week before they'd turn to cannibalism. A hundred Christians could probably stand a month before they ate each other.
Middle classers often do not grasp this because they are, for the most part, shut-ins cut-off from any real community and entirely dependent upon the media for its opinion and wealth to cover for their intolerance of others: they don't do community, they only do plushy individualism and this is why they see no problem in flooding the country with orcs - they see one polished brown and assume they are all like that. And As long as there is easy money, and a lot of it, there will be peace as this is the life lesson of middle class living and this is why they are so Liberal and seemingly tolerant.
And the greater the bond of the former the more the people can stomach not having the latter. The stronger the community, the greater the privation that each individual can stand.
E.g. The London riots which came in response to the economy and austerity measure by the gov. Now, White only working class neighbourhoods in Northern England, whom are equally reliant on benefits, did not erupt into violence and crime whereas the diverse cosmopolitan multi-ethnic swamp of London tore itself apart at the first sign of trouble.
I'm talking generally. Peace is an illusion, struggle is constant, and pacifism is the spirit of the stagnant and the dead as war is the Father of all things. And the relative peace of one age is afforded by the sacrifice of past and future generations. The western peace of the last sixty years or so was paid for by those in the world wars and will be paid for by today's young.
But if we exchange the word peace for order - which would be a better word for describing the "peace of a country" - then the order of a country depends on its people having a lot in common and having access to the bare necessities of life.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: rude people and nice people and bad people
You need rude people sometimes because sometimes the group is insane and someone has to say something. It was cheery and nice people whom don't like to upset the group that loaded the trains to Auschwitz. And in Orwell's 1984 it is these people that shouted the slogans loudest during hate week.I'm suspicious of those that are content with the group no matter what the group does. I'm suspicious of all those that won't judge because they won't blink an eye whether it's turning the planet into a dust bowl or exterminating Jews.