But for things like science(hard science)and much of engineering and invention then you don't want to rely on instincts all that much. Many of the worlds best scientists are social or full-on autisoids with virtually no instincts whatsoever.
This question means the exact same thing as the title, but I reckon people would answer a whole differently. It's funny how easily manipulable people are.
Remember, in Lord of the Rings when the men of the West were beseiged in the last citadel and the courage of all others had failed, it was the criminals that dwell in the mountain that saved the civilisation of man and drove the invading Orc hordes back to the east.
The racialist that was Tolkien was trying to tell us something.
Bloody Greeks always looking for a handout !! And if I'm not mistaken, giving you billions to maintain your infrastructure and tourist attractions is what got you into the mess you're in now.
I dont see why hate and prejudice have to go together. What if, and in order to avoid hateful feelings, you become prejudiced towards the truth?(i.e. naivety).
Why is it that those that see the least of the world are the most tolerant towards it?
Is it just coincidence that we are at our the least judgemental during this age where we are at our most self-indulgent and anti-social?
I can only compare our culture to people that won't leave their comfort zones due to the risk of encountering a negative emotion(which may include hate). But so long as they're safely in the bubble, then they have no use for prejudice.
Contrary to what most people believe, the tendency to be prejudiced is a form of common sense, hard-wired into the human brain through evolution as an adaptive response to protect our prehistoric ancestors from danger.
So suggests a new study published by Arizona State University researchers in the May issue of the "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology," which contends that, because human survival was based on group living, "outsiders" were viewed as -- and often were -- very real threats.
If prejudice is a form of common sense, this would explain why we're less prejudiced.
The lack of interest in all things cultured is itself a hallmark of the young generation. But I guess this is an historic thing, 12 year olds of 100 years ago were more sophisticated and deeper in thought than today's 50 year olds.
And the social world is changing at an ever-growing pace. Amongst the concerns of today are economic ruin, social disintegration, loss of cultural identity, mortgaged fetuses... these things stand as a flagrant contrast to the concerns of yesteryear.
I expect the youth to react palpably as the older generations continue to lose legitimacy of rank. That is, if parents continue to create a world that cannot secure existence for its own children then, sooner or later, expect the youth to hit the abort button.
If offspring merely followed their parents ways then we'd still be living in huts.
Parents do not define their kids to anywhere near the extent that they believe they do, and if you think that they're just what you are, it's because you don't know them.
For good or ill, children generally come to passively or actively rebel against whatever the parent generation believes(particularly under a Godless society as religious beliefs have greater continuity).
Considering that what is and what isn't "prejudiced" is defined by middle aged people in command of the establishment and culture, then of course children are prejudiced or else the world would never change. We would stagnate under the self-assurance of one generation that views itself as the moral pinnacle.
I'm hearing your violent threats and points taken. I received some shortbread biscuits as an unwanted Christmas present, so I shall be throwing those in as well.
I'm relieved. Valentine's Day has always been a special difficulty for a man dating multiple women, so I'm glad to have just the one woman this year. And I've even bought the present already; a Weight Watchers cook book.
Equalism, as defined by the enclaved elites, dictates that we ignore the pronounced criminality of Blacks as amongst the key ingredients of tolerance are apathy and ignorance, so we shouldn't expect anything other than negligence towards the victims of Black crime whatever race they may be.
Of course, I'm resting this on the highly logical, common sense assumption that Black women are going missing more often due to their proximity to Black men.
But the multiverse possibility does make mathematical sense. There are reasons to believe that there are more than the standard 4 dimensions we are familiar with, even if this is as counter-intuitive as the fact that the Earth orbits the Sun.
Not making do. Loving for someone as they are, not because of some script or from the emotional reward you get from romantic feels. True love is the total acceptance of someone, the good, the bad and especially the bad.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: How often do you go with your gut feeling?
Gut feelings work best when dealing with people.But for things like science(hard science)and much of engineering and invention then you don't want to rely on instincts all that much. Many of the worlds best scientists are social or full-on autisoids with virtually no instincts whatsoever.