The harem is the natural state: 80% of womanhood sharing the Alphaest 20% of manhood to ensure the survival of Alpha genes best adapted to the raw and savage state of nature. And since women's lib we are returning to this harem-state and it's lesser version which is serial monogamy - women endlessly rifling through committed lovers because she refuses to settle for beta. The inevitable conclusion of women's lib is that future generations will become more sociopathic and less civilised.
Civilisation, however, encourages monogamy for the purpose of 1 man to every 1 woman. This to ensure that there are enough "nice guy" genes passed on for the function of a civil society by curtailing the Alpha which women are biologically(read:tingle)inclined to select for.
They do but there has to be compensatory factors for his lack of confidence such as money or good looks.
Now normally the handsome man will only be approached by women less physically attractive than himself. On a night out the handsome but shy man will approached by numerous average looking women while the hotties give him a wide berth.
However, there are exceptions. Women seem to intuitively know the difference between a nervous man with little confidence and the 'strong, silent type' who is just being himself. And the hot women will approach the latter type of man which is useful to me as I'm often not in the mood to bother entertaining anybody.
I've been bigged up for my reply but I have no magic words that will change anything.
You sound like a girl I know. She had a boyfriend who was nice, nice to a fault, and when she told him off for being too nice he apologised. Shortly after he won first prize in a 'how to miss the point' contest.
You have to dump him and you have to tell him the reason why. How he handles the truth will decide which way he goes. Many a misogynist begins his life as a nice guy and he may go this way, or he may not, he may learn to accept how different women are and come to love them for it. It is up to him whether he chooses to live with or against reality. You can do no more for him. What he really needs is a man who knows what he's doing to take him under his wing. A woman cannot be this mentor.
It's never hopeless. You can always change something about you, your methods or your circumstances to increase your chances of success. Don't be downtrodden because you haven't found love on here - it's long odds to begin with - and those that do find love here are just very, very lucky,
There is in the classical sense. But in the modern sense there is no difference. Under aesthetic relativism(beauty is in the eye of the beholder)art is all in the personal expression. If you can rationalise a concept for a picture of a steaming pile of dog turd(for example)then this is as valid as the Sistine Chapel according to modern art.
I already have a girlfriend and even when I didn't I never saw CS as a likely love story. Maybe a bit of banter when the occasional hotty drops me a message, but that's about it.
Personally, if I lived in the countryside I would walk out into a field dig a hole in the ground and yell. But I don't live in the countryside. And until I do live in the countryside the good people here are stuck with me.
I think it's a sign of neglected communities, lack of civic pride and an angry underclass.
I think it's what happens within a youth taught to aspire and who are desperate for recognition in a society saturated with oh so much stuff. If you are a bit creative or entrepreneurial then you're faced with the fact that everything has been before. And from this come noise. Graffiti is noise on the walls.
I mostly mean India and China. I'm not sure what the Sheikhs are up to, but if they're getting involved this will be win win for us, our engineers will be being paid to build the thing.
They're something of a relic I would say. CERN now embodies everything most advanced about mankind.
The best thing about space programs is that the East is going to waste a lot of money on them. Their vainglorious exercises may allow the West to one day catch up by being better at the basics, in the same way that they overtook us whilst we were on the jolly.
I've always tried to be both a nerd and a jock. I think the upper classes have the right idea in valuing both physical and mental acumen - the nerd/jock dichotomy is itself from the middle and working classes - and I tend to look for women who are the same as me.
It is funny(and tragic)to see the dorks get their revenge when they assume the positions of power. I think outsourcing the factories and flooding the country with cheap labour was just nerds getting revenge on the jocks by robbing them of their livelihoods.
That's both right and wrong. You are not, in fact, unique snowflakes and the rules of attraction and love extend across the entire of Humanity. Some people attract much love from many people, and they do so for the near-same reasons wherever they go.
However, to believe, however wrongly, that you are a special snowflake is a must for the woman. Love must appease her narcissistic desire and entrancement with her own uniqueness.
What is unique about love is that alone amongst all other Human desires defines by its absence the utterly meaningless life: Love is the great WHY. It is essentially Human, and therefore, essentially absurd.
You can say what love is not. You can list the banal preconditions love. But you can never really say what love is, the language fails us.
A bunch of pissed off Muslims. I can give some respect to the likes of Iran trying to go their own way free from globalist forces - a bit like Russia I suppose - but this Sunni Isis lot are lunatics.
About 50/50 nature and nurture. Nature and nurture I actually believe to be a false dichotomy, but I'm not getting into that drunk at 4am after the club.
The downfall of marriage is one driving factor in serial monogamy. But the overarching psychologies are unwarranted ego and aspiration, disposable attitudes and the dearth of that old-fashioned 'make do and mend' spirit.
My sticking point is the first year mark. Since my first proper girlfriend at aged 16, 3 out of the 4 relationships I've ended either just before or just after a year.
I'm not saying you or that thread is wrong, just that there's more to it.
Women can and do get jealous of the looks of other women and no one could deny that this happens. Would a bit of fair play kill you? I honestly don't think it would.
No it isn't. You're just being an egregious buffoon as per usual. The beauty contest is nullified by the burqa, and if there is no contest then there is nothing to be jealous about.
No, yours is just a point on man's love of beauty presented in the run of the mill defamatory and anti-male fashion. I include that truth - what do you think thou shall not covet thy neighbour's wife means? It's telling men to keep it in their pants.
But in addition to this I include the truth that women would like to be beautiful - why do you think the beauty industry is worth billions upon billions? Beauty is a contest between women as much as it is a trait which attracts men. Nearly every plain Jane girl would like to be the prom queen just as every average boy wishes he was captain of the football team, a millionaire, or really good at fighting.
All uniforms are equalisers. Kids wear school uniforms so that poor children are not embarrassed and picked upon by the children of wealthy parents who could afford the fancy clothes. Making people look the same is a way of assuaging divisions between people.
Islam takes this a step further. Not only does the burqa uniform disguise displays of wealth and status, but it disguises even the god-given inequality which is beauty itself. And this is way too extreme in my opinion.
One way of enforcing thou shall not covet thy neighbour's wife is to put a bag over her head whenever she leaves the house.
Likewise, it prevents women from envying the beauty of other women by veiling beauty and thus negating the control beautiful women have over beta males and the influence they have over alpha males. This makes Islam highly resistant to feminism because it is the ugly woman's envy of the beautiful which is amongst the primary motivations for feminist thought.
Basically it limits bullying, envy and competitiveness by removing choice and diversity. All women are equal under the bag.
I actually blame the number of gay men in the fashion and beauty industry. It's like they get these pretty, feminine women infront of them and think to themselves 'how can I do my utmost to make her look like a prepubescent boy?' You go in clothes stores and the girl models on the walls, and not to say they're unattractive, but they have more-chiseled faces and are starved down to this boyish/unwomanly body shape.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: Are human "polygamous " by nature?
Yes, that is a yes. It's as natural as Eve's temptation.