And sorry dude I'm not trying to spoil it. I know there's no friendship, trust or budding attraction on here so truthing it is well premature. Truthing only works when a woman likes the man more than she dislikes the truth and the women here don't really like any of the men(especially me); I know you're on eggshells.
Men don't like babies or kids as much as women do that's my take on it. From the perspective of the best dating options I'd rather be a single dad than a single mum.
By no means are all single mums easy, however. My Mum was a single parent and fortunately for me I spent a lot less time hearing her creaky bed frame than I did seeing a succession of Greater Betas clearing out the garage, fixing the boiler and fitting the new kitchen etc. I don't think beautiful(8+)single mums are easy. And the few men my Mum did actually go for were Alpha males just as reckless as my Dad.
I think some front-load the incentives because of the massive disincentives further down the line. They sleep with you easily because of the longterm headache that is her sprog. I don't think they realise that spreading your legs easily is the perfect example of how not to attract a reliable and committed boyfriend(unless he's the desperate type who she wouldn't fancy anyway).
Other than that they're just bored and feeling a bit trapped. It's anything to give them a thrill.
Those are my explanations for why single mums are this way.
Women need some overriding and dominant authority to be wise - be it God, husband or patriarchy. Essentially women are the same as Leftoids - a foolish and unhappy mess when not in the submissive role of the relationship/society. The Left-wing became ridiculous and self-annihilating when they won and defeated the authority that ruled them - the very same holds true for women.
Only where Leftoids and Women are the underdogs is a society/house capable of not tearing itself down. Only where Leftoids and Women are the underdogs do they contribute anything worthy. The authority which they claim to despise is the only thing which limits their excesses and keeps them on track. Leftoids, just like women, secretly need and desire that which claim to hate in order to save them from themselves.
Women without a firm plan or solid structure to guide them saboutage their own lives and the lives of their family and any others around them. It takes a lot of effort from a woman for her not to be a well-poisoner.
You've got problems - to stop short of saying the writing's on the wall - once one of you starts demanding passwords and invading the other's privacy.
There shouldn't be any major secrets in a relationship, but you shouldn't need to prove that there are no secrets. A relationship is based on trust and faith, not proving the facts. Proof and trust don't belong together.
I can't think of any better reason for losing control of yourself than love. The rest of your life is for control, routine, safety etc but love isn't. I think if you can't let go then it isn't love.. I want the rollercoaster ride of it all and to hell with the controlled environment.
But you've got to know when to quit. And you've also gotta know how not to carry the baggage over from all your past relationships.
Totally worth it. I'm like a moth to a flame. I'll spend the rest of my days banging my head against that beautiful light bulb. I wouldn't have it any other way.
What about all the Germans and Irish and bloody Italians?? You should be a nation of dirty dogs and lotharios, and the American woman should have an arsehole like a broken cat flap.
Many people online and not married by age 35 are eaten up by trivialities and have lost all perspective on life(if they ever had any to begin with). The philosophy is meaningless self-indulgence and the internet is just filler substitute for a love and life not lived.
Just look at CS as a cauldron of baggage and insecurity. Exceptions exist.
I'd choose the state-backed scheme for agrarian development based upon segregation. I'd get to be like a plantation owner in the 18th century Deep South.
We have laws in place which prevent the strong from devouring the weak. But this should be the limit for the constraints the weak place upon the strong. I don't think we should extend these laws so that the ugly can dictate over the beautiful.
Civilisation is supposed to be a co-existing hierarchy of the inferior and superior, do not crush the best amongst us or the world will be a much uglier, more miserable and deceitful place.
I'm a bit biased, however, because most of the female bosses I've known have been an industry that women don't have any skills and experience in.
Our female bosses were always non-technicals who didn't know the profession and industry, they were never amongst the workers, and it's unlikely that they've ever done an honest day of practical work in their lives. They tended to come in and impose a raft of new measures they'd learned at some generic management training course suitable for managing monkeys at walmart, which then failed miserably, and then the department would be left to manage itself and undo all the damage.
Generally speaking the female bosses I have known didn't have the personality and charisma for the job. They've been quite authoritarian but they didn't lead in a way that makes you want to follow them and they tend to provoke a lot of resentment within the ranks(especially amongst the women). They tend not to have an apathy with those beneath them(male bosses often don't - but they're better faking at it)and you very much did the job because you were being paid to do it.
Unnerving how the iPhone dominates the market. I'm buying one next week. I've no idea what it does(other than makes calls)and I'm expecting it to be like the Jesus of Nazareth of smartphone technology; very difficult to get into, but once you're in so much to explore. Plus I want to be bang-on trend however briefly.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: what you listening to no.11
Conway Twitty ~ Hello Darling