British Blacks are like the rest of us(ish), but the women look like men.
Jews are good, but then there's the big nose and the cynicism to consider and I'm quite cynical enough as it is already and I want a woman with pretty and delicate features.
Arab women can be hot, but their ways are alien.
Orientals are a superior race, but their looks are alien.
So I'm going for Hispanics, as they are the most similar to us both on the inside and the outside.
The primary reason is because women have to trade upon their personalities to become friends with other women. One of the female privileges is that, dependent upon how attractive she is, she will always have some proportion of the Human race willing to be friends with her in the form of orbiting men - no need for personality.
This is why women aren't funny. I mean, how many man can honestly state, hand on heart, that they've ever met a genuinely funny woman?
The other reasons are ego, jealousy and passive aggression.
Social media has gone beyond killing conversation, originality and thought and has moved onto corrupting the experience of life itself in the form of morons postng constant updates and fanatcally taking pictures of what they're doing instead of actually living it.
It won't be long until advertising, social media and the natural herd impulse of Humanity conspire together to annihilate all the depths of personality from the world and the Human race becomes 100% cliched thought as opposed to the mere 97% that it is today.
I would if it was that serious. As a single man I feel ashamed about coming on here as it is and if I had a proper, serious girlfriend - as opposed to the stream of floozies I'm currently ploughing my way through - then I'd feel not twice, but thrice the shame about coming on here for my daily howl at the moon.
If you're Qatari then your life is pretty much paid for just by being born. I think charity and social welfare are quite big under Islam and sharing is key, the problem is that there's little to nothing worth sharing between all the hungry mouths jostling for place at the ever shrinking table(not unlike Western economics, I suppose).
You know what a country like Russia is like? And do you know any of its history?
Ivan the Terrible, Peter and then Catherine the Great, Stalin and now to Putin. Tyrants! Every man(and woman)of them. But accepted and even beloved tyrants nonetheless.. Russians can't function without the rod, they need something to fear.
WWIII will be like the Arab spring across the West. During which time Russia will come to dominate central and near asia, China will absorb the far east(and continue unabated in Africa), and the West will be in turmoil in a series of Nationalist uprisings against the Liberal elites.
Ethnocentrism is the only force that can oppose globalism and the old Liberal way of the Borg. Blood is thicker than water. The master will is greater than the plunderer will, the sword is victorious over money, money power is overthrown and abolished by blood in an age of Caesars. Cometh the hour, cometh the man.
Most certainly, some of the best there ever was came from conditions of complete poverty. Genetic intelligence comes with a randomness that other IQ's do not precisely because it's inborn and not a result of any kind of social privilege.
Did you know that the IQ gains once attributed to education are now being reversed? Since the 1980's(the decade the hippies/baby-boomers matured and began to gain/seize control of our institutions)education has been yielding an increasingly dumb generation of students.
Many of them are less intelligent, but I don't think this is why they're underperforming. Imo, it's more the case of having an economy that doesn't reward masculine and physical traits in the way that it once did. The more balanced economy of the future with manufacturing and labour-intensive agriculture would place the chavs at the advantage and the effete lower-middle at the disadvantage.
It's the environment that's making us all appear more intelligent than we really are. Our education has improved as our genetic quality has fallen away(the educated fool).
Ever since we stepped down from the trees and began to mould nature towards our own ends then we were stepping outside of natural selection. We evolve through civilisation(dysgenics and eugenics whether conscious of these or not); a manmade surivival of the fittest. Or, in the case of our Western civilisation of debt, makework, non-judgementalism and welfare; survival of the unfittest.
Dawkin's small family advice is itself an of example civilisational selection process and the survival of the unfittest. The pro-civilisation advice would be to have large families of the best and brightest and for the not so spectacular to breed less, but both nationally and globally those that(generally)breed the most are the least educated, intelligent and talented.
In time all systems work towards their logical extremes. It is beyond Humanity to stick with what it has for very long(even when it's a good thing).. three Liberals can't even join a bowling club without introducing as part of their moral imperative some amendment of the statutes.
The American dream of shrugging off all inhibitions upon the individual was always going to lead to the ditching of wisdom and virtue. And what is liberty without wisdom and virtue? The greatest of all nightmares; for it is folly, vice and madness, without tuition or restrain. It is the modern world.
That is the definition of the kind of idiocy that only decadence can breed; A people so removed from the essentials and fundamentals of life that they place emotion above the basic need of survival.
There's a reason why drug use is most common in the richest nations. And there's a reason why drug use exploded post-60's with the onset of playground/makework/consumer capitalism financed by debt and posterity. The reason is that we'd never had it so good, and easiness breeds weakness of mind, body and soul.
I agree with not introducing another vice into the fold. But I would also say that I agree with the government taxing the hell out of smokers and the minimum price on alcohol and such things.
Drug use will diminish as staying alive becomes more difficult. Our society is lax and decadent in general which is why many of our worst instincts come to the fore; from binge drinking, to obesity, to drug addiction the mistake is to separate these issues from their root cause - Human idiocy.
Cheaper drugs(and it's questionable if legalisation would ultimately cheapen drugs whilst maintaining quality; I think you'd have weed that's half the price but a quarter the strength)does not result in a person spending less money on drugs, but in a person buying more drugs with the same amount of money... Unless you're suggesting that the taxpayer begins to subsidise drug use outside of any plan for rehabilitation?
On the one hand, legalised drugs will get more people trying them and so ultimately addicted to them.
But on the other hand, legalising drugs would hinder the world of crime... and with this same reasoning in mind, I'm now advocating the legalisation of murder with the introduction of slaughter cafes.
I certainly have a dispensity towards questioning authority from a position of unqualified scepticism(I guess for all the criticism I make of the times we live in, these times are still conscious within me).
But, in my defence, I have the integrity to doubt everything, including the validity of my own doubts... 'Kings will be tyrants by policy when subjects are rebels from principle', these are wise words I remember before thinking about my rights against authority and what is meant by the word freedom. Freedom being a word I rarely use without thinking.
RE: Would you date outside your race group and if so what race
British Blacks are like the rest of us(ish), but the women look like men.Jews are good, but then there's the big nose and the cynicism to consider and I'm quite cynical enough as it is already and I want a woman with pretty and delicate features.
Arab women can be hot, but their ways are alien.
Orientals are a superior race, but their looks are alien.
So I'm going for Hispanics, as they are the most similar to us both on the inside and the outside.