Anything that sounds even remotely like the above post is an example of a Wife not to pick.
What we have here is the maturity of a teenager(expressed in her indifference to plan for matters of great importance). A strong aversion to learn from or even acknowledge experience(explicitly the experience of others and implicitly her own experience). The fickle nature and sheer ungroundedness of the hyperfemale(which relates to the previous flaw). And a woman who seems to have no appreciation for just how much greater the risk that getting "hitched" is for men.
It'd be a nice to see some good examples of wives to pick from the women(the White women), but for now and because of scarcity, we'll stick with the terrible warnings.
And you have to be careful with ex-army types. Dont assume that they're now disiciplined, macho and tough just because they've been soldiering when the fact is that many become dysfunctional and traumatised wrecks and make excellent Liberals.
Yes, we need to purge our institutions of the decadently effete because they command zero respect from the young(or anybody else who isn't decadently effete).
Although, specifically ex-army types should be used to organise young and listless men who have left school and are now on the benefits.
Ha haa, have you seen what effeminate jokes teachers are these days?
Do you really think that Liberal teachers from the nouveau middle class would dare raise a hand to thuggish kids off the estate? They wouldn't have the balls, and even if they did, they would get their arses handed to them.
It means you're a loser in how women define the word loser - which is the opposite of how functional civilisation defines the word loser.
Now the unemployed alcoholic badboy with charisma is how civilisation defines the loser, yet 10 women mates with him before 1 woman mates with the sensible accountant. This trash amongst men is a leader amongst women.
My theory is that women, being the mothers of life, are inbuilt by mother nature to have a population inhibitor. Civilisations naturally liberalise with age - they're born paternal and die maternal - and to stop civilisation from spreading too far and killing all the animals and trees women gain equality in late/decadent civilisation and begin undoing the culture, destroying all sense of organisation and responsibility and breeding the race into the ground - thereby halting civilisation's advance, saving the animals and trees, and returning humanity to the limited and primitive tribal existence of the eternal peasant.
This kind of solipsism is just religion minus any sense of perspective, principle or purpose.
The truth is rationally and objectively determined as fact. That is what the truth is. The truth is not relative to the imaginings of the groupthink(I'm unsurprised to see the women agreeing with your post).
I can tell you that the anti-science/anti-will of this kind of meaningless, relativist wash derived from an infantile sense of non-judgementalism unleashed on a plastic society lacking in paternal guidance, will be the end of the line for western thought and the first ideas to burn in the fires of the cleansing apocalypse.
However, being aloof benefits men more than it does women(something betas seriously, seriously need to understand). You see, preselection does not work on men as we do not chase status - he looks at her and listens to her and he fancies her(or not) - but the woman's impression of a man(or indeed, impression on anything)is always relative to the group, and so his aloofness suggests to her that he has options with other women and therefore she fancies more because of this.
They've tested this on swans. Male swans surrounded by cardboard cutouts of female swans are more attractive to the Lady swan than male swans on their own.
It wants to be playful and not too literal, but nonetheless giving an impression of who you are. Avoid lists. And don't put something like 'I have a good sense of humour' because no one with a good sense of humour would ever say this.
I'm definitely more of an open my mouth and just let it come out kind of person. Unless it's a situation I deem relevant to maximising my personal advantage.
I get cynical and depressed over the women that I'm not dating. I think "aww look how pretty she could be if she knew what a bike is" or "she could be so intelligent if only she knew what literature was". My tendency is to generalise all women just because the majority of them are primitive and/or out of shape.
But the women I actually date I hold no grudges against. And I have my male privilege to thank for this. The privilege of not being positively attracted to negative and traumatising personality traits.
They can work for men. Your memories of your ex that was a 7 will soon be replaced by your new 9.
But it can have the reverse effect. A new woman that is less attractive than your ex will actually make you misremember your ex as being even more desirable than she was, which can only be depressing.
Not that true, the majority of women perform make work, not valued career jobs(Social Media Manager? That's glorified customer service!)and it's wrong to say that many women are desperate to work. Of course, they want to be told they can be doctor, laywer, organic farmer etc but these is just words - the majority end up in nosense(and soon to be redundant)jobs which they despise.
What we do have is a fickle gender with a state thats prepared to finance their whims through benefits, a feminist narrative that preaches consequence-free choice and irresponsbile actions, and an emasculated male gender that's becoming progressively less attractive to women.. at least until recently. The dying of Liberalism/Feminism and the rise of the Radical Realtalker Rebellion will allow men to, once again, become attractive to women in a way that they've not been since before the 1960's herbification of the male race into the emasculated trousered apes that they became.
As nature as intended, at least until we can change the core of a person(and save civilisation)through genetic engineering.
If I marry a woman with a cute and upturned nose, but it turned out she had her beak sawn off when she was 25, then my kids are still are going to grow up with a generous conk. And I wouldn't be happy about this. In fact I'd sue.
Good grief! How mortifying must that be to wake up French?
And how galling this is for me, a person that has been practicing his French accent for years and still can't get the line "of course it looked hopeless, but we kept fighting" to sound right in French. Almost as if it just wasn't meant to be.
It's the same kind of thinking, this is the point.
Universally anything bad that happens to the individual is the fault of some force beyond their control(genes/jews/patriarchy). This mentality comes naturally to an infantilised Western world as Westerners, like v.young children, have a strong aversion to holding themselves accountable to the consequences of their actions.
When you look at film and pictures from the past the people are all as fat as they are now, it's just a trick of the camera that makes them all look shapely.
No, there's no such thing as inescapable obesity all there is are some people that can eat a little more because they naturally burn off more calories when doing nothing(such as people with AIDS) - and not even by all that much. You're fat/thin because you don't intake the right amount of calories and nutrients and you don't exercise properly.
I was one of these so-called "hardgainers" as I believed I could eat anything without getting fat. Well, when I actually sat down and planned a sensible diet and stuck to it it turned out I was never eating enough before(always be wary of how the self chooses to remember its own behaviour(particularly women)and the weight came piling on with weight-lifting.
Well, if the places in the world with lots of children started dying younger we wouldn't even have this thread. But if we remove the bury head in sand/dying of the poor scenario and think of how we'll survive in a world of increasing crop failures and dwindling supplies of fresh water then we need to come up with something better.
Besides, you're against outsourcing aren't you? That's the greenest argument in politics. And I'm 25. I'm going to be here in 2050.
That's because you've got common sense - a dwindling commodity!
I'm mostly referring to younger girls who will fall under this influence, but the problem for them is they will often keep the fat for life. It's a lot easier to get fat than to get thin.
And what with the feministic possession of the public airways and nearly every mixed-gender social context, you will often hear women encouraging diabetes, disease and death if this allows them to curtail male desire and to shade themselves from aspects of reality which require a sense of discipline and responsibility.
It's dividing women. For every woman starving herself to be thin there are 3 filling out on fast food, lazy days and mewling mantras of a delusional and often misandristic nature.
Too many girls are looking at these photoshopped stick figures and thinking "well, I'm never going to look like that" and going the other way and blimping out to the max as men, commonsensical parents and trained medical professionals look on in horror.
I like Karma when it's the belief that I do good things therefore good thing happen to me, and not, good things happen to me therefore I must be a good person.
Although, I don't actually believe necessarily that good begets good and bad begets bad because life really isn't that fair.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: How to pick the right wife.
Anything that sounds even remotely like the above post is an example of a Wife not to pick.What we have here is the maturity of a teenager(expressed in her indifference to plan for matters of great importance). A strong aversion to learn from or even acknowledge experience(explicitly the experience of others and implicitly her own experience). The fickle nature and sheer ungroundedness of the hyperfemale(which relates to the previous flaw). And a woman who seems to have no appreciation for just how much greater the risk that getting "hitched" is for men.
It'd be a nice to see some good examples of wives to pick from the women(the White women), but for now and because of scarcity, we'll stick with the terrible warnings.