I see the EU as a smoke screen. It's becoming a scapegoat of the Right to disguise the much larger problem of the materially resourceless economy i.e. it's disguising the facts that the Western private sector is a debt-subsidised joke and that our skills and ethics are useless.
Yes, we want out of the EU.. but this challenege pales as an insignificance compared to the challenge of Western re-industrialisation in the face intensifying global competition.
It's nothing to do with the age of the man, it has everything to do with the type of men you like: aloof, indifferent jerks that are prone to leaving you high & dry no matter how old he is.
In Britain it will be tidal power and underground coal gasification. Each region needs to play to its strengths, which is why I laugh when wealthy moral posturers here in England place solar panels on the roof of their homes even though the manufacture and installation of such creates a greater carbon footprint than if they just used power from the grid.
My advice: If you want to learn things about Human beings then study what they actually do, don't ask for opinions, especially on something as politicised and emotive as race,
But yes, of course it matters, I like Latinas the most - although I'd prefer White women if they weren't so fat and unsophisticated - and there are races that I'm only novelly attracted to, as well as races that I'm not even attracted to at all. And finally we have cultural difference to throw in on top of this.
My first reaction would be one of devastation(surprised it's the 2nd page before anyone said this: sensitive egos abound). If you love her it's emotionally crippling and even if you don't then it's still 100% ball-shrivelling.
Also, if the person leaving goes onto benefits then every penny spent on keeping that person should be made public knowledge and this should be contrasted with how many special school places could be kept open and how many elderley people could be fed and kept with warm with the same money.
Let it be known how many others are made to suffer and pay for this persons lack of commitment and ill-regard to the consequences of their panoply of choices.
Yes, but Western women don't see it like this. Feminism has taught her to place herself, the woman, ahead of all things including her children and especially her Husband... the latter becoming almost a dirty word to these self-obsessed, overweight, good-for-nothing shrikes.
Take a look at the middle east now, that'll be us in a few more years. Atrocity, terror and murder are just some of the many attractions you can expect to find at Diversityland.
They say that good manners costs nothing. Well, the people that say that are wrong. Manners cost time & effort. And seen as little I say or do isn't calculated to maximise my personal advantage then I see no utility in being polite to irrelevant(to me)people.
Idealism getting the better of me again, talking about what ought to be instead of what is.
Truth is that many males cry all the time. I know of a guy that cried when the poem he wrote for a woman didn't have the desired effect, although, I think the mewling proclamation that he "just knew she wouldn't like it" is what really killed her tingle. Anyway she never called him again.
I would add, however, that sensitive men are more likely to face reality as men throughout evolution have been self-reliant and therefore reality-illiteracy equals death for men. Women through evolution have not been self-reliant and have survived through extracting resources from men, therefore her internal world can be far more delusional in regards to the external world without her dying as a consequence.
The thumbs up from women are all part of the delusion. As my argument makes logical sense(and, non-coincidentally, is proven by science to be the most frequent form of lying)women follow their emotional impulse to disagree with anything that could be construed as criticism(even when balanced with a positive).. especially when it's a criticism from me.
So no, money does not beget the desire of a honey if the man with money is otherwise repulsive to women.
Priming the desires of women is about hitting key emotional triggers. His money or good looks alone would simply be too rational, concrete and substance-based to genuinely attract the desire of women.
Vast wealth will score you the honeys, not just because of the money, but because men capable of making that kind of money are generally powerful and confident. So a man with influence and power in his means means as well as influence and power in his personality is like catnip to women.
It would be a bloodbath, crime would go through the roof.
We should be encouraging community involvement - utilising local knowledge to tackle local problems - by rounding up a possy of residents and taking a shotgun to the kneecaps of local drug dealers. Like Derry in Northern Ireland.
It's interesting how non-conformity becomes a conformity all of its own. I'm referring to this inane, petty technophobia that people seem to hold up as some kind of mortal triumph.
RE: UK ponders dumping Europe.
I see the EU as a smoke screen. It's becoming a scapegoat of the Right to disguise the much larger problem of the materially resourceless economy i.e. it's disguising the facts that the Western private sector is a debt-subsidised joke and that our skills and ethics are useless.Yes, we want out of the EU.. but this challenege pales as an insignificance compared to the challenge of Western re-industrialisation in the face intensifying global competition.