Hmmm... yes and no. And more of the no today than perhaps in the past.
You see, women are a paradox, they are simultaneously risk-averse but also like to flirt with danger. They like a man who could protect her from third parties and outside threats, but her actual relation to him is filled with danger, mystery and uncertainty and, at least on one level, she actually ikes to feel quite vulnerable and compromised... this is why Feminists never stop talking about manipulation and power; they get a tingle from the talk.
But no she won't expect him to lay a finger upon her(even if he has already), because she'll rationalise and excuse every sensible indicator of him doing so because she's thinking with her tingle. Women think with their tingle more strongly(although less frequently)than men think with their c*ck. It's just the mechanics of it all that is different.
What a generalising question. And as we all know, everybody hates to be generalised. Lol
But yes, everybody has been jealous at some time or other - particularly women - and so watch closely anyone that says they are never jelaous because you can add delusional to this person's list of character traits.
You know what her Husband said about her cooking? "I prefer weetabix".
It's self-evident that she's not going to appreciate any White Knighting. No, what we have here is a liberated female thug-lover who freely chooses to cuddle up to the fists of fury of dangerous and non-supplicatory men... Even a rich and famous Beta wouldn't cut it for Nigella, so I wouldn't get your hopes up.
It's fact, but whether humanity has given nature a nudge in regards to climate change is debatable. Yes, our emissions are a drop in the ocean in comparison to what naturally comprises the biosphere, however, the difference between mankind and apes is just a drop in the genetic ocean: a slight change to what comprises the underlying make-up of nature creates a large difference to the reality of nature and we should learn from this.
In any case, we need a biosphere to support X amount of people and so climate change is something to be monitored and acted upon regardless of the cause.
Just joking. I have no idea what you're talking about, but with all this effort you've gone to to apologise, I can only hope that what you did was nothing trivial.
The population of Whites is plummeting and the populations of all other major races are soaring.
Demographically it's a certainty, and perhaps one day the WWF will add us to the endangered species list and what's left of us will live on a little nature reserve island where yellow people come to take pictures and throw bread at us .
But still, Liberal Democratic Weimar transformed into National Socialist Germany in just a few short years, demographic trends don't allow for things like this.
I don't know, I just said it was possible in maths. Once upon a time the same equations and theory were the only reason we had to believe in the existence of Black holes, and Einstein actually thought they were impossible in nature.. it looks as though he was wrong.
If alternate dimensions are to be found anywhere then it would be at the most fundamental and miniscule of levels. Hopefully, we'll know more in the future now that science has begun its great turning inwards.
I believe it to be possible that the 5th dimension transcends along spacetime in our universe. You(not literally)could travel via the 5th dimension and see yourself as a child, access to the 5th dimension would break the limited access/perception we have of the 4th dimension(time's arrow).
The 6th dimension transcends the 5th dimension; meaning it traverses all spacetime possibilities within the confines of the laws of this universe. You could travel along the 6th dimension and see a different you living under the same laws of reality.
The 7th dimension allows transcendment of the 6th; meaning it traverses not only all spacetimes of this universe, but of every universe possible. You could travel through the 7th dimension to find another you operating in a universe that has completely different laws of reality.
Sounds like science fiction, but mathematically it is possible.
Probably not if I knew for certain that I was going to die.
But it would depend. I wouldn't stand and watch a pre-school burn down and do nothing about the tortured screams emanating from the blaze, even if this meant placing myself at risk.
And when I was 17, I broke my leg because a child was playing in the road with a car speeding towards her, but unfortunately when I dove in I couldn't get my left leg out of the way in time. But the idea of not diving in never crosses your mind for a second, concern for yourself doesn't come into it in situations like this. You are nothing but instinct and adrenaline.
Each person has their own bias through which they view objective reality. Objective reality being the limits of Human experience as a species - examples of which would be things like time's arrow and the appearance and sensation of solidness("solid" objects are in fact predominantly empty space, but try punching a brick wall).
Yes i agree some women do use guilt trips but that behaviour is learned it's not innate.[/qu
Evolutionary scientists would have something very different to say about that. They would say that the lack of physical strength of the woman means that they favour a more sophisticated and subtle form of exercising control over people that plays to their innately superioir emotional strengths; such as guilt trips.
Yes it happens a lot, but the women don't get angry they get guilt trippy as women don't like to force getting their own way so much as they like to manipulate getting their own way.
Not today, no. But don't let this keep you from your audience of posturing enclaved Whites who eagerly await your words of wisdom that have been parroted perhaps only a few billion times before.
So civilisation is either Aryan or Oriental(Qatar can't be taken seriously because of its bribed citizenry)and the savages are almost entirely Arab or Black. Forgive me if I don't keel over and die of surprise.
I'd love to know some more Chesters, Humphreys and Ruperts; what with growing up on the wrong side of the tracks, I never thought I'd meet one for real.
Children are natural hedonists. And since the 1960's so are many of the parents.
The reason that hedonists are happy is because they care to know about nothing. Ignorance is bliss. The tree of knowledge and the tree of life are not the same tree.
Although, giving your kids the occassional whack does seem to make them less pain-averse/pleasure-seeking(hedonistic)as adults with greater common sense, more balls and a much stronger capacity for genuine self-reflection and criticism.
Does a leader have to be versed in the art of killing people? On principle I don't see why this has to be an essential.
Although, I do predict a Nationalist/military coup against the collapsing Liberal state when the debt/moral bubble bursts and millions upon millions are left either bankrupted or starving whilst the minorites, which have long been kept silent through welfare payments, turn into snakes when the host can't pay any more charity out and the civilised and productive men desperately turn to a charismatic strongman from the far-right to restore order to the chaos. These coups will be something I'll support through lack of a better alternative.
Few good and strong laws with tough punishments for breaking them - an abundance of law does not create order - accompanied with strong external motivations/pressures/supports to prevent individuals from destructively and dysfunctionally deviating from the 'way'.
The worst thing about online dating is misleading images, the old myspace angle(cute face, ugly body).
The best thing is that I can see it here in my underpants and stained vest talking to women that would be an 8 on an off day. I can't do that down the pub!
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: Nigella Lawson 'attacked' by husband
Hmmm... yes and no. And more of the no today than perhaps in the past.You see, women are a paradox, they are simultaneously risk-averse but also like to flirt with danger. They like a man who could protect her from third parties and outside threats, but her actual relation to him is filled with danger, mystery and uncertainty and, at least on one level, she actually ikes to feel quite vulnerable and compromised... this is why Feminists never stop talking about manipulation and power; they get a tingle from the talk.
But no she won't expect him to lay a finger upon her(even if he has already), because she'll rationalise and excuse every sensible indicator of him doing so because she's thinking with her tingle. Women think with their tingle more strongly(although less frequently)than men think with their c*ck. It's just the mechanics of it all that is different.