Happygolucky4u: Children are like little sponges they learn from everywhere and everything. And if they are lucky they grow up into adults who continue to learn.
For good or ill, children generally come to passively or actively rebel against whatever the parent generation believes(particularly under a Godless society as religious beliefs have greater continuity).
Considering that what is and what isn't "prejudiced" is defined by middle aged people in command of the establishment and culture, then of course children are prejudiced or else the world would never change. We would stagnate under the self-assurance of one generation that views itself as the moral pinnacle.
If offspring merely followed their parents ways then we'd still be living in huts.
Parents do not define their kids to anywhere near the extent that they believe they do, and if you think that they're just what you are, it's because you don't know them.
Children are not born with prejudiced attitudes or with stereotypes. They learn values and beliefs from their family, peers, teachers, the media, and others around them. In other words, children learn prejudice through socialization.
Brigantia: Children are not born with prejudiced attitudes or with stereotypes. They learn values and beliefs from their family, peers, teachers, the media, and others around them. In other words, children learn prejudice through socialization.
And the social world is changing at an ever-growing pace. Amongst the concerns of today are economic ruin, social disintegration, loss of cultural identity, mortgaged fetuses... these things stand as a flagrant contrast to the concerns of yesteryear.
I expect the youth to react palpably as the older generations continue to lose legitimacy of rank. That is, if parents continue to create a world that cannot secure existence for its own children then, sooner or later, expect the youth to hit the abort button.
Happygolucky4u: Children are like little sponges they learn from everywhere and everything. And if they are lucky they grow up into adults who continue to learn.
yes there are sponges ..... you'll never be able to pin point where they learned stuff from .... if they take interest they soak it up !!
limay123: yes there are sponges ..... you'll never be able to pin point where they learned stuff from .... if they take interest they soak it up !!
The lack of interest in all things cultured is itself a hallmark of the young generation. But I guess this is an historic thing, 12 year olds of 100 years ago were more sophisticated and deeper in thought than today's 50 year olds.
Brigantia: Children are not born with prejudiced attitudes or with stereotypes. They learn values and beliefs from their family, peers, teachers, the media, and others around them. In other words, children learn prejudice through socialization.
Briganyia,Earlier this morning while reading the thread question I wrote down on scrap paper what my response would be and thought I'd post my answer later on in the day cause I had things to do.
After reading your response just now I noticed I had written down the very same thing.
I guess great minds think alike or something like that.
Children do learn not only from home but from family,peers,teachers, and the media. But they also learn from socialization.They also carry it through Adulthood.
Ccincy: Briganyia,Earlier this morning while reading the thread question I wrote down on scrap paper what my response would be and thought I'd post my answer later on in the day cause I had things to do.
After reading your response just now I noticed I had written down the very same thing.
I guess great minds think alike or something like that. Children do learn not only from home but from family,peers,teachers, and the media. But they also learn from socialization.They also carry it through Adulthood.
Anger is a legitimate reaction of the soul to it's wounding and most of that wounding occurs in early childhood. The child could have suffered the wounding of too-much-ness, overwhelmed by the outer world, or not-enough-ness, neglect or abandonment of the childs need by it's environment. As a result, a person can misread the nature of the world, adopt a set of reflexive responses to manage the level of anxiety created. A child that was overwhelmed by the environment, such as the Fathers alcoholism or the Mothers depression tends to acquire a passive, co-dependent personality in order to survive. A child that suffers the insufficiency of it's environment tends to develop a diminished sense of self worth and will constantly seek affirmation and reassurance from others. In both cases the person will be carrying a great deal of anger.
So, certainly in the case of anger, early wounding in the child can lead to deep seated anger, though quite often this 'hidden' anger may be unacknowledged.
Happygolucky4u: Children are like little sponges they learn from everywhere and everything. And if they are lucky they grow up into adults who continue to learn.
I do believe this is more or less true. However, take the example of Kennedy. He was brought up in an ultra-affluent community, and went to private schools attended only by others of his ilk. His entire environment was conducive to all the trappings of racial and economic bigotry. Yet he soared to the top (and certainly extremely so, for the era) of championing all those causes: injustice to races, poverty, corruption, etc...So, it must also be attributed to individual personalities and motives.
Contrary to what most people believe, the tendency to be prejudiced is a form of common sense, hard-wired into the human brain through evolution as an adaptive response to protect our prehistoric ancestors from danger.
So suggests a new study published by Arizona State University researchers in the May issue of the "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology," which contends that, because human survival was based on group living, "outsiders" were viewed as -- and often were -- very real threats.
If prejudice is a form of common sense, this would explain why we're less prejudiced.
Contrary to what most people believe, the tendency to be prejudiced is a form of common sense, hard-wired into the human brain through evolution as an adaptive response to protect our prehistoric ancestors from danger.
So suggests a new study published by Arizona State University researchers in the May issue of the "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology," which contends that, because human survival was based on group living, "outsiders" were viewed as -- and often were -- very real threats.
If prejudice is a form of common sense, this would explain why we're less prejudiced.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).