So can Monopoly in this house. One thing that we do at Christmas as a family is board games. Cludeo, Monopoly and a few others. Pictionary is hilarious when you've had a few.
We purchased a new game this year. You have to put like a mouth guard in your mouth. It's huge. Then you have to say what is on the card. The other players have to work out what you're saying.
The thing is nobody really has a problem with others disagreeing with them. It's how they disagree with someone. Especially where there is ill intention, which often is what comes with hate speeches. Hate speeches are a form of suppression if you think about it and they're not really needed. Can people not make a point of their views without making it so another person can't? Yeah and I'm 44 and I rebel sometimes but doesn't mean I have to do it the wrong way, when I do I am doing to make a point.
I understand your reasoning based on stereotyping a country, I personally don't agree with that, or restricting their ability to voice an opinion. It is always about how you do it with me and what your intent is. Because it is sadly being used for the wrong intent.
I wonder how you can have respect for those that have fought for your freedom, then represent yourself in such a disrespectul way in how you think? to me that isn't right.
Here is a negative of no restriction, especially in the younger generation is this the NWO people are looking for?
I don't watch the news. I read it, you can also see where people are being manipulated to think one way. Like the theory people are sending sublime messages through it. You are all creating your own wars based on what you are been told to think.
I still have empathy, compassion, but have you actually looked at people who are posting hateful speeches and comments. How they talk of people. How they choose to believe the mass propganda, not the reality and it's based on negatives. Then look at the anger and hate people choose to display by it. The Anarchy and unrest that is caused. Because you're being told to think a certain way about a gender, a religion or an event.
Why you would feel the need to go to such extent to go against a licence which promotes that the person has a healthy knowledge of the environment that they are in.
Some limits on expression were contemplated by the framers and have been defined by the Supreme Court of the United States. Starting in the 1940s U.S states began passing hate speech laws. In Beauharnais v. Illinois the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the state of Illinois's hate speech laws. Illinois's laws punished expression that was offensive to racial ethnic and religious groups. After Beauharnais v. Illinois, the Supreme Court developed a free speech jurisprudence that loosened most aspects of the free speech doctrine. In 1942, Justice Frank Murphy summarized the case law: "There are certain well-defined and limited classes of speech, the prevention and punishment of which have never been thought to raise a Constitutional problem. These include the lewd and obscene, the profane, the libelous and the insulting or 'fighting' words – those which by their very utterances inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."
I see it like this under the current climate, that anything you say. Can be twisted, manipulated and used against you.
That is just my thoughts on people that have so much hatered for others. Especially in the virtual world. They forget that they leave a digital footprint.
I very much doubt these people would express their views in such a way if they were held accountable.
Rachie14 Forum Posts (2,330)
I always forget the time differences.
to me that isn't right. 
RE: Current Thoughts (Cont)~~
People will talk you know