Exactly. As was also the case in Libya, and a lot of other countries, the so-called "rebels" in Syria are mostly Kurdish mercenaries paid, supplied, and armed by the US CIA. Their job is to commit massacres which will then automatically be blamed upon the government by the press. Then comes the no-fly zone and the air strikes and finally the bloody invasion.
Anybody who honestly looks at the way this pattern is repeated time after time can not help but realize that its nothing short of a methodical takeover of the world's resources by the US and its partners in crime.
AIPAC for example, has been blatantly bribing Congress members for decades...and the bribe money doesn't even come out of their pockets. Congress gives billions to Israel and then Israel gives a few million back to pay for the bribes.
Or look at Obama. He got big millions as campaign contributions from the Wall Street banks and then gave them a trillion dollar bailout bonus.
This Congresswoman is small-fry as far as corrupt politicians go.
I think the entire "war on terror" including 911 and all the other supposed"terrorist attacks" and the economic collapse has been nothing but staged, false-flag deception. Real death and destruction of course, but the so-called terrorists are just stooges. The intent is not just to distract us from other news. It's all designed to convince people that a military dictatorship is needed to keep them safe.
The first thing they should do is take their weapons and go home. They are not there for humanitarian reasons, they are there to try to topple the Syrian government and set up a puppet regime.
Just as they have done in dozens of other countries around the world.
There's something like that in my house. Not long after moving in I discovered that there is a low level hum that can only be heard from certain points in an upstairs bedroom. There is no electricity involved with the sound but it is entirely constant without any sort of variation or modulation. No idea what the source may be. Moving my head a few inches in any direction makes the sound disappear. It can literally only be heard at a few specific points.
Well, because of nuclear weapons and their potential to kill everybody, elite included, they are actually trying to replace war with other, less volitile means of mass genocide.
The Report from Iron Mountain is (in my opinion) a valid study of the process of substituting other processes to accomplish the various functions of war within society.
Disease has been pretty effective in some cases of targeted genocide, but it's pretty hard to control. I think organized famine will be the primary weapon of choice for the great culling that is to come. As economies collapse, food will at first become incredibly expensive, and then will become totally unavailable for most people.
There will be soup lines of course but beware the soup prepared by a government that considers you to be a useless eater.
The Presidential Commission on World Hunger (1979) estimated that $6 billion per year, or some four days' worth of military expenditures. could eradicate world starvation.
The problem is that there's no profit to be made in eradicating starvation. But there are billions to be made in the manufacture of arms.
At first glance it appears to be a sort of democratic encyclopedia. But it is controlled and has its own agenda.
And in both cases, (naturalnews and wikipedia) the end result is to stir up controversy initially and then to promote passive cynicism as people realize that the motives of the site aren't as objective as they pretend to be.
The world of disinformation is like master-level chess.
It's common for deceivers to very vocally promote the very issues they really want to quash, including every exaggerated rumor they can find. Knowing that their over-zealousness and lack of balance will be noticed and will provoke a backlash of scepticism.
Sometimes it's the same people posting the "for" and "against" dialogue of an issue. That way they can really fine tune the desired "sythesis" of the dialectic. Readers think they have heard "both sides" when in fact they've been led by the nose toward a particular pre-planned opinion.
No matter what the supposed crime, arrest the perp as a suspected enemy combatant or sympathizer under the military commissions act.
No defense lawyers, no jury, no civilian judges, no appeals, no right to remain silent, tortured confessions allowed, indefinite incarceration without trial.... etc.
Seeing that there are multi-billion-dollar contracts involved there are all sorts of possibilities to consider. Not only would the company lie in order to place the blame on human error of an employee, rather than on the failure of their safety systems. But also there is the very real possibility that the crash might have been due to some type of sabotage.
Apparently the driver knew there was a problem and that the train would probably crash for several minutes ahead of time and had alerted controllers about the situation.
My guess is that he had disabled the automatic controls in order to make up for lost time and then forgot to reengage them until it was too late to prevent the accident.
RE: Should Countries stay out of other Countries problems with war issues ?
Poll: Should Countries stay out of other Countries problems with war issues ?Yes. Even though it would really cut deep into the profits of the war industry.