Actually, like 911 and the "war on terror" it will be mostly hoax. At least initially.
They'll set off a few bombs and blame it on imaginary homegrown US terrorists. And then they'll bait a few marginals into actually doing some attacks etc. Then the momentum will take over. The police will be brutal and people will react. And it will escalate into a genuine civil war with high casualties on the civilian side. Violence will generalize and real opposition groups will form, etc etc etc.
That way the war and the police state will seem to be just the unavoidable consequence of events. But they were the plan all along.
Right. Government is necessary. But government is supposed to serve the needs of the people. And now it's the other way around. People are expected to serve the government, and the government is in bed with bankers and industrialists from all over the world.
Those who push hardest for outlawing guns are not the altruists among us But it's they who'd create a big socialist state If they had power now, they'd have hung us
Disarming the people converts them to sheeple For they lose any means to resist They'll just follow in line and obey every sign When they're ordered to march of the cliff
They use cultic fringe elements from all sorts of different political or religious counter-culture groups to search out marginal individuals.
Then they carefully manipulate the person's worldview to induce them to commit some sort of radical violent act.
Or, if that proves to be too difficult, the government can simply perform the violent act themselves and then furnish evidence by which to condemn the patsy.
Thereafter entire groups of people can be accused as collaborators of members of a subversive group, just on the basis of false evidence.
After all, the revolutionary group doesn't even have to really exist. It just has to appear to exist.
In fact it's much handier to have a totally fake revolutionary group because then its actions will be 100% predictable and manipulable.
If the debt was forgiven, it would NEVER have been paid back completely. It sounds to me like the terms of the debt were simply re-negotiated. That's not forgiveness at all.
As for the US supposedly having forgiven China's debt for WW2, that's a rather strange way of looking at the situation.
The government that the US aided in WW2 was the dictatorial Nationalist KMT government that later fled to Taiwan when Mao's communist forces took over.
You can hardly call it forgiveness of a debt when the money was lent to the enemies of China. There is no way that the Chinese would ever feel any obligation to repay loans made to the KMT (who were in fact puppets to western powers).
And as for the US's current situation. We're not talking about just a lot of old debts. The US continues to overspend its income every single day. It's not just old debts. It's living beyond one's means.
Yes. It's largely the fault of crooked politicians. But the US supported such crooked politicians for decades, and is still doing so.
The US has crushed nation after nation, both militarily and through oppressive financial manipulations. And the US people were happy to let it happen as long as their personal standard of living was high.
Other nations lived in very poor conditions while the US lived very high on deficit spending. I don't think you will find much sympathy for what is in fact a correction of longstanding financial injustice.
I doubt if the US standard of living will collapse all the way down to its actual worth. The infrastructure is already there so it's not likely to deteriorate all the way down to 4th world levels. At least not immediately.
But the US is going to be greatly humbled. And that humbling is well-deserved and needed.
It doesn't really matter which party's pigs are fatter. They are all bred on the same globalist farm. They are set in place above us, not to care for us or love us, but to rob us of our wealth and do us harm. Piglets like Barack Obama are but actors in the drama. In the end they'll wind up on their master's table. All the mediatic spin is but lies from start to end. It's just there to lend some credence to the fable. Yes Obama's acting regal, doing things that are not legal But the other party's guys did just the same. They are nothing but bit actors, minor un-important factors It's the banks and financiers who run the game.
When and by what means did the president ever receive any supposed "executive powers" that allow him to rule by decree? Never.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
Sure you did. Borrowed money seems great at the time. It's only when the debt comes due that you feel the effects. Reagan's wild spending policies, continued by both Bush's and by Obama wrecked the US economy.
When Reagan took office the US national debt, after 200 years of the nation's existence was 1 trillion dollars (one million million). When Reagan left office eight years later the debt was over 2 trillion. In other words Reagan doubled the national debt during his term.
Anybody who considers that a success deserves to read the New York Times.
The day is approaching and now close at hand when the US will find no more credit. A massive depression is headed for land and the world can do nothing but let it
We reap what we sow, and we sew what we rip and what goes up must always come down. there's no funds left to borrow, so day after tomorrow the whole card-house will come tumbling down
Don't go blaming the Mayans nor lizards from space This disaster is of our own making We took and we took both by hook and by crook Now it's other folks turn to be taking
It's not an "accident" when someone pulls a gun. And what would be the "appropriate" response when a total stranger pulls a gun on you on a deserted street at night?
RayfromUSA Forum Posts (6,611)
RE: Mayan prophecy: 2016 US Presidential Election
What a relief.