The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!! ( Archived) (251)

Oct 3, 2010 12:24 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
BellaTheRebel48
BellaTheRebel48BellaTheRebel48Minneapolis, Minnesota USA7 Threads 2 Polls 242 Posts
somone4u: First of all i have to thank bella and her courageous to talk on this man and arrogant control thread, thank you for creating the thread and thank you for the eloquent way you handle those dishonest Deservers who keep attacking you for been honest and expressing your view. I went through the thread and i can see that you handle yourself very well, so well done. This should be the really mean of your laws to express your view but some bully minded people would like to remove that right from you and they feel that attacking the messenger is the best way to kill the message. to be honest is NOT mean you are not loyal to your country.


blushing No need to thank me, and I am well aware of American arrogance, "the U.S. rules the world mentality," the "don't say anything about the U.S. unless you're praising the good ole USofA," the "we are kind and good to all," yada, yada, yada.

No one has forced any of them to read the thread, much less respond to it.

I've been told to leave, that I'm not a good American, etc., etc., that's fine. Make me leave! Just because you don't like what I post, that's YOUR problem. Ignore it or deal with it! Did I ask any of you to like it? Do I care if any of you like it? Uh...that would be a resounding, NO!!!

Psst!! Just in case you didn't already know!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:26 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
BellaTheRebel48: No need to thank me, and I am well aware of American arrogance, "the U.S. rules the world mentality," the "don't say anything about the U.S. unless you're praising the good ole USofA," the "we are kind and good to all," yada, yada, yada.

No one has forced any of them to read the thread, much less respond to it.

I've been told to leave, that I'm not a good American, etc., etc., that's fine. Make me leave! Just because you don't like what I post, that's YOUR problem. Ignore it or deal with it! Did I ask any of you to like it? Do I care if any of you like it? Uh...that would be a resounding, NO!!!

Psst!! Just in case you didn't already know!


your a bigger patriot cause you care ... bouquet
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:28 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
mnowsa
mnowsamnowsaRajshahi, Rajshahi Division Bangladesh145 Threads 3 Polls 7,536 Posts
BellaTheRebel48: No need to thank me, and I am well aware of American arrogance, "the U.S. rules the world mentality," the "don't say anything about the U.S. unless you're praising the good ole USofA," the "we are kind and good to all," yada, yada, yada.

No one has forced any of them to read the thread, much less respond to it.

I've been told to leave, that I'm not a good American, etc., etc., that's fine. Make me leave! Just because you don't like what I post, that's YOUR problem. Ignore it or deal with it! Did I ask any of you to like it? Do I care if any of you like it? Uh...that would be a resounding, NO!!!

Psst!! Just in case you didn't already know!


yeap! truth kinda hurts sometime real bad. But what i find really amazing is that some of these people here are actually desperately trying to justify the actions! unbelievable!sigh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:30 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
somone4u: First of all i have to thank bella and her courageous to talk on this man and arrogant control thread, thank you for creating the thread and thank you for the eloquent way you handle those dishonest Deservers who keep attacking you for been honest and expressing your view. I went through the thread and i can see that you handle yourself very well, so well done. This should be the really mean of your laws to express your view but some bully minded people would like to remove that right from you and they feel that attacking the messenger is the best way to kill the message. to be honest is NOT mean you are not loyal to your country.
doh doh doh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:31 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
chris27292729: Therefore is not the action of individuals as Albertaghost claims,is the action of US soldiers in uniform, breaking the US military code of contact.-
....and they are NOT Individuals?doh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:43 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
chris27292729
chris27292729chris27292729IOS island, South Aegean Greece93 Threads 15,811 Posts
Those individuals US soldiers commiting a crime, not individuals soldiers of a drug lord.- Soldiers of US military Conrad commiting crimes.-Get it.
Conrad73: ....and they are NOT Individuals?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:49 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
mnowsa
mnowsamnowsaRajshahi, Rajshahi Division Bangladesh145 Threads 3 Polls 7,536 Posts
Conrad73: ....and they are NOT Individuals?


fair enough..let me ask you a very simple question here. when, let's say, a group of (individuals according to you) US soldiers go to some humanitarian mission and accomplish the job, what kind of "terms of reference" is used to describe those soldiers? are those soldiers described as "individual" soldiers or they are called "US soldiers"?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:49 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
chris27292729: Those individuals US soldiers commiting a crime, not individuals soldiers of a drug lord.- Soldiers of US military Conrad commiting crimes.-Get it.
....and getting Court-Martialed for it!
So where is the Beef?confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:52 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
mnowsa: fair enough..let me ask you a very simple question here. when, let's say, a group of (individuals according to you) US soldiers go to some humanitarian mission and accomplish the job, what kind of "terms of reference" is used to describe those soldiers? are those soldiers described as "individual" soldiers or they are called "US soldiers"?
You all need to be Lawyers!
They are individual US-Soldiers,since only those Individuals that have committed the Crime are getting Court-Martialed as Individual US-Soldiers!doh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:53 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Conrad73: You all need to be Lawyers!
They are individual US-Soldiers,since only those Individuals that have committed the Crime are getting Court-Martialed as Individual US-Soldiers!
In other words,it isn't the US-Army that is getting a Court-Martial!
So stop Fishing!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:55 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
chris27292729
chris27292729chris27292729IOS island, South Aegean Greece93 Threads 15,811 Posts
They Court-Martialed soldiers commiting a crime.
Conrad73: ....and getting Court-Martialed for it!
So where is the Beef?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:57 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
chris27292729: They Court-Martialed soldiers commiting a crime.
you still fishing for something that ain't there,in other words,you'd like to make the US-Forces collectively responsible for the action of those Individuals!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 12:58 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
mnowsa: fair enough..let me ask you a very simple question here. when, let's say, a group of (individuals according to you) US soldiers go to some humanitarian mission and accomplish the job, what kind of "terms of reference" is used to describe those soldiers? are those soldiers described as "individual" soldiers or they are called "US soldiers"?


depends if they are doing their task as they have been told to ,or they decide to "have some fun" on their own ,with out the authorization of their senior officers

now, since USArmy isn`t under the agreement of the Geneva convention and can`t be judged In Hag ( Holland ) they are here bay responsible only for crimes against the interests of the States
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:05 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Boban1: depends if they are doing their task as they have been told to ,or they decide to "have some fun" on their own ,with out the authorization of their senior officers

now, since USArmy isn`t under the agreement of the Geneva convention and can`t be judged In Hag ( Holland ) they are here bay responsible only for crimes against the interests of the States
actually nothing to do with the Geneva Convention!
You're talking about the International Court of Justice,which only comes into the Picture if a Memberstate doesn't prosecute such a Crime!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:07 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
mnowsa
mnowsamnowsaRajshahi, Rajshahi Division Bangladesh145 Threads 3 Polls 7,536 Posts
Boban1: depends if they are doing their task as they have been told to ,or they decide to "have some fun" on their own ,with out the authorization of their senior officers

now, since USArmy isn`t under the agreement of the Geneva convention and can`t be judged In Hag ( Holland ) they are here bay responsible only for crimes against the interests of the States


i was about to mention the same thing but i am glad u did. so now we know how much the us government really care of "taking care" of the properties and lives of other nations. i rest my case here.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:07 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Conrad73: actually nothing to do with the Geneva Convention!
You're talking about the International Court of Justice,which only comes into the Picture if a Memberstate doesn't prosecute such a Crime!
actually the ICC (International Criminal Court)
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:09 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
mnowsa: i was about to mention the same thing but i am glad u did. so now we know how much the us government really care of "taking care" of the properties and lives of other nations. i rest my case here.
Actually you haven't made a Case!laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:11 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Proudamerican100
Proudamerican100Proudamerican100Somewhere, California USA2 Threads 1 Polls 570 Posts
somone4u: First of all i have to thank bella and her courageous to talk on this man and arrogant control thread, thank you for creating the thread and thank you for the eloquent way you handle those dishonest Deservers who keep attacking you for been honest and expressing your view. I went through the thread and i can see that you handle yourself very well, so well done. This should be the really mean of your laws to express your view but some bully minded people would like to remove that right from you and they feel that attacking the messenger is the best way to kill the message. to be honest is NOT mean you are not loyal to your country.



doh And this surprises you?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:11 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
mnowsa: i was about to mention the same thing but i am glad u did. so now we know how much the us government really care of "taking care" of the properties and lives of other nations. i rest my case here.


the stronger sets up the rules , that`s not a new thing and Im not surprised of it at all, what I am surprised to see is, that people expect from the whole world to look away and shut their mouth about injustice( Im not specifically talking about the USA ,here)
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oct 3, 2010 1:14 PM CST The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!!
Boban1
Boban1Boban1bigplace, Central Serbia Serbia144 Threads 5 Polls 18,789 Posts
Conrad73: actually nothing to do with the Geneva Convention!
You're talking about the International Court of Justice,which only comes into the Picture if a Memberstate doesn't prosecute such a Crime!

quite frankly ,they are all the same to me as none of them is independent
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here