The U.S., At It Again..Or Should I Say, STILL At It!! (251)
murnycranbrook, British Columbia Canada1 Threads 159 PostsAlbertaghost: Don't. It's a question.
Like I said, thank you!------ This thread is Archived ------
murny: Conrad, is it even possible for you to address the point at hand? I'm not sure if I have ever read a thought that was your own - you always deflect and distract.
The evidence is there - experiments are still being done and we need to stand up in defense of our fellow human beings.
People are waking up, Conrad, your approach is ineffectual....
The evidence is there - experiments are still being done and we need to stand up in defense of our fellow human beings.
People are waking up, Conrad, your approach is ineffectual....
peace on earth and equality for all
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: peace on earth and equality for all
Like they used to say in the Thirties?"Willst Du Nicht Mein Bruder Sein,Dann Hau Ich Dir Den Schaedel Ein!"
But I might be first!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Dani Veracity
Look at the SOURCES that this journalist cited. It doesn't matter that you haven't heard of a particular journalist.
Unless of course it is info provided by the government or mainstream media, then of course it is ALWAYS the truth!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Like they used to say in the Thirties?
"Willst Du Nicht Mein Bruder Sein,Dann Hau Ich Dir Den Schaedel Ein!"
But I might be first!
"Willst Du Nicht Mein Bruder Sein,Dann Hau Ich Dir Den Schaedel Ein!"
But I might be first!
yeah... the good old days ...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: yeah... the good old days ...
Good Old Days he calls them!
------ This thread is Archived ------
murny: Look at the SOURCES that this journalist cited. It doesn't matter that you haven't heard of a particular journalist.
Unless of course it is info provided by the government or mainstream media, then of course it is ALWAYS the truth!
He doesn't exist!Unless of course it is info provided by the government or mainstream media, then of course it is ALWAYS the truth!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: He doesn't exist!
Okay, I'll talk REALLY REALLY slow so maybe you will understand.
Actually, keep going the way you are, no one takes you seriously because of it.
LOOK AT THE REFERENCES AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE.
Look into my eyes - stay on topic, Conrad. There are reports from universities and organizations that are well-known that are cited.
Any questions?
Oh, and just because you didn't hear of this particular person before, of course they don't exist, is that what you are saying?
WHATEVER! Whoever it was that quoted these sources, you should still look at the message, not attack the messenger. As in, look at the sources and verify them, not get hung up on WHO quoted them. There you go again. Might want to try a different approach.
You know, any propagandist worth their salt should know all this already. I think they should fire you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: Liberals , Democrats, Conservatives ,Republicans ... thats all just a farce , just one more tool in the workshop of dragging attention
like the old Romans said " panem et circenses" bread and circus
like the old Romans said " panem et circenses" bread and circus
Serbians were so kind to the Muslims in Kosovo. To the ethnic groups of Bosnia. In the 1990s, that they are still trying to rebuild their houses.
If anyone knows a circus maximus, it was Milosovic that would take them up into a Mountian complex for flag waving.
------ This thread is Archived ------
How to determine bias in a document.
1. Who wrote it? Examine the author to determine personal bias or an agenda.
2. When did this person write it? How removed in time from events is the author?
3. Who published the document? Again, examination of the publisher's catalogue can often determine the agenda.
4. Determine the audience for the document. Again, this often exposes bias.
5. Research and examine quotes, citations and the bibliography. These are often misused and quoted out of context in order to support a hypothesis.
1. Who wrote it? Examine the author to determine personal bias or an agenda.
2. When did this person write it? How removed in time from events is the author?
3. Who published the document? Again, examination of the publisher's catalogue can often determine the agenda.
4. Determine the audience for the document. Again, this often exposes bias.
5. Research and examine quotes, citations and the bibliography. These are often misused and quoted out of context in order to support a hypothesis.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: Serbians were so kind to the Muslims in Kosovo. To the ethnic groups of Bosnia. In the 1990s, that they are still trying to rebuild their houses.
If anyone knows a circus maximus, it was Milosovic that would take them up into a Mountian complex for flag waving.
If anyone knows a circus maximus, it was Milosovic that would take them up into a Mountian complex for flag waving.
Im glad you liked Milosevic, Im not quite a fan of his
------ This thread is Archived ------
I am not going to debate the studies and the testing done, Murny. They happened most often before clinical controls were put on medical testing. Just a guestion. How many lives did these preliminary human studies save or effect positively?
Someone had to be first for radiation treatment after the Manhattan project. Today radiation treatments are a major cancer treatment. 1000 receive it annually, today.
Prior to medical controls for human testing, they found test subjects were they could find them.
Back in early 1970s, they had a conference on human genetics breakthru and studies that were going on. They suspended genetic research for nearly 4 years. Trying to get a handle on the ethnic issues associated.
The conference did set some ethnic guidelines and protocol for human testing. But today we are still in the stem cell debate, the human life creation debate, the embryo debate....all from dNA breakthrus.
And you got to know that the Human Genome project was used to improve chemical and biologic weapons. At least that is why the US did not license or sell the research to the WARSAW block countries.
Seems to me, that medical research can find ways around any state laws or international protocols made.
Someone had to be first for radiation treatment after the Manhattan project. Today radiation treatments are a major cancer treatment. 1000 receive it annually, today.
Prior to medical controls for human testing, they found test subjects were they could find them.
Back in early 1970s, they had a conference on human genetics breakthru and studies that were going on. They suspended genetic research for nearly 4 years. Trying to get a handle on the ethnic issues associated.
The conference did set some ethnic guidelines and protocol for human testing. But today we are still in the stem cell debate, the human life creation debate, the embryo debate....all from dNA breakthrus.
And you got to know that the Human Genome project was used to improve chemical and biologic weapons. At least that is why the US did not license or sell the research to the WARSAW block countries.
Seems to me, that medical research can find ways around any state laws or international protocols made.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Boban1: Im glad you liked Milosevic, Im not quite a fan of his
I don't like Milosovic, I help to take him and his regime out of power.
------ This thread is Archived ------
nitro2345: wow , true poetry! , no one have argued it not even the ones that are always arguing all posts ...
Hate speech doesn't need argue; just condemned.
------ This thread is Archived ------
murny: Like I said, thank you!
And like I said, it's a question. If you are thanking me because you cannot understand it then no problem as it comes as no surprise however, methinks you don't answer it because it may jeopardize your position.
------ This thread is Archived ------
BellaTheRebel48:
Not one of those who were carrying on about my airing the dirty laundry list of U.S. would trade places with the people the U.S. INTENTIONALLY INFECTED WITH GONORRHEA AND SYPHILIS!!
Not one of those who were carrying on about my airing the dirty laundry list of U.S. would trade places with the people the U.S. INTENTIONALLY INFECTED WITH GONORRHEA AND SYPHILIS!!
That was fifty years ago dear. Since then, the US does nothing of the kind. Sure, you have vaccines being tested and such but no massive deliberate infection of people. And your linking to criminals who are being brought to trial for their crimes and pretending this is official policy is laughable.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Albertaghost: And like I said, it's a question. If you are thanking me because you cannot understand it then no problem as it comes as no surprise however, methinks you don't answer it because it may jeopardize your position.
I addressed the forum subject about continued testing on Americans. by the US. You, of course, having no way to deny some good solid evidence that it is indeed still going on (yes, people are being deliberately exposed to chemicals, biological agents, etc etc etc), has nothing to do with soldiers who allegedly did things to people. It is completely beside the point,and typical of propagandists such as yourself to distract from the subject at hand.
------ This thread is Archived ------
LILLYLADY: Further research on the Gulf War Syndrome from Desert Storm says that the problems affecting the soldiers were caused from chemical toxic agents within the middleast that Saddam was using, including residues of nerve gas. The pyridostigmine was given to the troops to combat the effects of possible low level exposure to nerve gas.
The WW2 drug you speak of was called BZ for short.It was experimented on some US troops to get them to be more aggressive and last longer in battle. Very mind altering drug. The movie "Jacob's Ladder" depicts what happened. According to the movie, a combat unit slaughtered each other.
The WW2 drug you speak of was called BZ for short.It was experimented on some US troops to get them to be more aggressive and last longer in battle. Very mind altering drug. The movie "Jacob's Ladder" depicts what happened. According to the movie, a combat unit slaughtered each other.
Very interesting fact - around 1/3 of soldiers who suffer from Gulf War Syndrome never left the States to go into combat! What does that tell you?
------ This thread is Archived ------
murny: Very interesting fact - around 1/3 of soldiers who suffer from Gulf War Syndrome never left the States to go into combat! What does that tell you?
1/2 didn't get combat pay?
------ This thread is Archived ------
murny: Very interesting fact - around 1/3 of soldiers who suffer from Gulf War Syndrome never left the States to go into combat! What does that tell you?
It tells me that it would be very foolish to accept that statistic without a LOT of critical analysis of all the data, data gathering and the scientific method applied by those who wish to assert this "statistic" to be factual, true and supportable.
It tells me that there is, indeed, something wrong with this picture. What it doesn't tell anyone is that "this statistic, standing on it's own, is proof that the US Army poisons it's own troops for the sake of some nefarious top-secret experiment".
Some critical thinking is in order, here, Murny. You're a sharp lady and as such, I'm pretty sure you would have to agree if truth is more important than politics for you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
A question
Too many fake profiles here ...
New here. Single Guy from Grand Rapids, MI.
Reality Check
"Emotions at the Crossroads"
The world is as you see
the death nail for dating websites
Name A Book In The Bible That Begins With The First Letter Of Your Name
Blast From The Past
Your Mental Health
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).