Let’s not forget that Enemy # 1 is the only USA entertainer that’s gone into one of our war zones and entertained the enemy and improved there morale, instead of our own USA troops’ morale. Well, I can’t recall another traitor entertainer like Enemy # 1 doing that.
galrads: Let’s not forget that Enemy # 1 is the only USA entertainer that’s gone into one of our war zones and entertained the enemy and improved there morale, instead of our own USA troops’ morale. Well, I can’t recall another traitor entertainer like Enemy # 1 doing that.
Galrad, yes it says it all does it not? Some legacy eh? Jenny
I think this quote from dtic article sums it up pretty well.
Her messages broadcast over the communist propagandist Radio Hanoi changed how the American troops perceived the political will of the United States from the beginning of the war to its latter stages. Fonda?s words to the American POWs and servicemen embodied the inextricable connection between public support from the home front and the war effort overseas. Her statements against American prisoners-of-war and active pilots were so devastating that the North Vietnamese used them as a propaganda tool to deflate the morale of the American troops. The iniquitous legend of “Hanoi Jane” continues because Jane Fonda caused irreparable emotional damage to Vietnam veterans.
Never mind that what i wrote about the messagers the prisoners gave her was not true, what Hanoi Jane has done in other ways qualifies her as a traitor
Still wonder where the story about the messages came from as I have often heard it. I also watched a movie on TV, where this scene was shown.............???
M4_Mischief: So was everybody protesting the Vietnam war an enemy?....I don't put any in any credence into a hoax email and perpetuation of fake news.....
If someone, protector or not, did the things Enemy # 1, they would be a traitor too in my little mind.
well apparently they aren't the things in this e-mail.....I don't think she did or thought any different than others who were protesting the war at the time....
rainbowdream2017Melbourne, Victoria Australia2,486 posts
I am curious ....It seems whirred to me that fighting communism in Vietnam was ok and yet, no one didn't want to fight forma Yugoslav communism but instead western countries fully supported dictator Tito ? Why political double standard ? Is it because Tito was an English spy ?
From what my ex Croatian family told me, Tito was a unifier.
Vietnam was an extension of the Cold War. Where as Tito challenged Stalin and was the founder of "national communism."
Tito was praised as the creator of modern Yugoslavia, his wisdom and statesmanship united Yugoslavia's historically antagonistic national groups in a stable federation. He was a unifier.
rainbowdream2017Melbourne, Victoria Australia2,486 posts
galrads: From what my ex Croatian family told me, Tito was a unifier.
Vietnam was an extension of the Cold War. Where as Tito challenged Stalin and was the founder of "national communism."
Tito was praised as the creator of modern Yugoslavia, his wisdom and statesmanship united Yugoslavia's historically antagonistic national groups in a stable federation. He was a unifier.
He was a unifer to make massive graveyard of those who were not happy with his dictatorship system and at the time, who ever was against dictator Tito and lived in western countries... was open hunting season on anti Yugoslav - anti - communist ...as west loved to preserve forma Yugoslav dictatorship system ! Stalin found that fake Tito was trained in Canada under fake name and fake passport and was an English spy and CIA spy so Tito had no choice but to brake up eveey ties with Stalin who discovered his manipulative spy games. You know, the truth always surface out ...no matter how well has been hidden. That what you said is actually an formal explanation of western world. It's highly hypocritical double political standard ! ! ! I see little people doesn't know much about their own country dirty politic ...It's mind blowing when you take blue pill. Makes you wonder why so many American life was waisted in Vietnam, as well so many Vietnamise life ...What was achieved, what did you fight for ? Now is global communism knocking on your door. Communism that you went to fight against in Vietnam. What an irony, deception and betrayel to all who died fighting communist in Vietnam.
rainbowdream2017: He was a unifer to make massive graveyard of those who were not happy with his dictatorship system and at the time, who ever was against dictator Tito and lived in western countries... was open hunting season on anti Yugoslav - anti - communist ...as west loved to preserve forma Yugoslav dictatorship system ! Stalin found that fake Tito was trained in Canada under fake name and fake passport and was an English spy and CIA spy so Tito had no choice but to brake up eveey ties with Stalin who discovered his manipulative spy games. You know, the truth always surface out ...no matter how well has been hidden. That what you said is actually an formal explanation of western world. It's highly hypocritical double political standard ! ! ! I see little people doesn't know much about their own country dirty politic ...It's mind blowing when you take blue pill. Makes you wonder why so many American life was waisted in Vietnam, as well so many Vietnamise life ...What was achieved, what did you fight for ? Now is global communism knocking on your door. Communism that you went to fight against in Vietnam. What an irony, deception and betrayel to all who died fighting communist in Vietnam.
My statement on Tito is based on my ex Croatian in laws opinions. They grieved long time when Tito died.
rainbowdream2017: I am curious ....It seems whirred to me that fighting communism in Vietnam was ok and yet, no one didn't want to fight forma Yugoslav communism but instead western countries fully supported dictator Tito ? Why political double standard ? Is it because Tito was an English spy ?
Tito was pure Benevolence compared to that Hanoi-Crowd!
rainbowdream2017Melbourne, Victoria Australia2,486 posts
Conrad73: Tito was pure Benevolence compared to that Hanoi-Crowd!
Tito was murderer ....not any better than Hanoi - Crowd. The only important difference was that Tito worked as multiplay spy for CIA & English. Unbelivable clever manipulator in games playing.. Canadians trained him well.
rainbowdream2017Melbourne, Victoria Australia2,486 posts
Conrad73: Tito was pure Benevolence compared to that Hanoi-Crowd!
Western propaganda was supporting Tito who was fake Tito. Isnt it logical question, why would westerners support communist dictator Tito, he suppose to be enemy of democratic world !? The real Tito was uneducated and from a very poor family, his own mother said " thats not my son" when she sow him and he never went to visit her gravyard ... Fake Tito spoke several forign languages, played piano like a virtue and spoken Croatian & Serbian language as FOREIGNER with heavy foreigner accent. He wasn't a real communist, he enjoyed luxurious life like a King and killed everyone that threatened his authority. Read my thread " who are you commorate Tito." Stalin lived simple as true communist do but not Tito, he loved western luxuries. Everything was fake ... people were forced to believe in all fakeness.
The story about Jane turnning slips of paper the prisoners gave her with their social security number on it appears to be not true. I heard this story so often, saw that scene in a movie, so where did that come from if it was not true? When I heard it was that the prisoners had given their phone numbers. Anyway why is that story been around for so long?
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Well, I can’t recall another traitor entertainer like Enemy # 1 doing that.