RDM59: Would it be credible evidence for possible use in a future divorce court ? ....
In the UK, nothing that happened BEFORE the marriage is permissable in the divorce courts. Even if you´ve been living together before getting married and you discover stuff that happened before you got married.
RDM59: Would it be credible evidence for possible use in a future divorce court ? ....
I did just see a news report last week stating more people are using technology to spy on their spouses to gather evidence for divorces. Sad, sad, sad.
Bronze33: I did just see a news report last week stating more people are using technology to spy on their spouses to gather evidence for divorces. Sad, sad, sad.
Agreed...unless there is an imbalance in personal wealth and that can be covered in a prenuptial agreement. Doesn't speak well of a person if they don't have any trust in the other unless they feel that they be being preyed upon in which case...run for the hills. Oh for the good old days when life was much simpler (or was it me that was much simpler ).
venusenvy: Gaaaawd!! Do peeps really do this chit to each other???
How right you are, where is the trust??? and what exactly can you find from these "Background checks"?? I did one on myself a couple of years ago, and found all they told me pretty much what I would have already said after two or three dates.
wow o wow, if you want to go through all that for a potential mate, what are you going to ask for if it's a potential friend, and heavens above, what if it's a potential partner.
I'll stick to the 300 page questionaire I hand out
Bronze33: What do you think of full background checks on potential mates?
I think its an appalling deceptive invasion of privacy, though I can understand how little gold diggers could be tempted to do this to maximise their financial gain.
gleneagle: I think its an appalling deceptive invasion of privacy, though I can understand how little gold diggers could be tempted to do this to maximise their financial gain.
ok,,,devils advocate here,,,, I am the American afterall lol. So, you go out with a woman,,( to make it apply here) and you decide to marry her or maybe just get real close. You find out latter that you have been setup by a lady that wants to put you in jail and take whatever you have. You get accused because she knows how to piss you off and had made friends with the local sergeant on the side. If you would have seen the background report you would have seen that she had several restraining orders put on her and that she has recently been charged with attempted murder as she knowingly has infected someone with HIV and they are not doing so well. Extreme??? In this world and even in small communities there is deception. Personally I would rather not have my record public yet I have worked in situations where I have had my background checked for employment. So, for me I like to stay around people that are not putting me at risk. We are there so I think it is more complex than a matter of checking financial worth. And as for a woman wanting to know if she is involved with a felon and they wont be traveling to Spain this year together, I think that it is ok to know these things if the criminal has screwed up their own life, why have them mess up yours?
we have all done things...or had experiences that we are not proud off. we have all had relationships.. that for several reasons have been lost..
if you learn by these ..then that is what counts..to delve into the past is pointless.. when you start a new relationship..are we not starting with trying to be open.honest ..to trust one another...?if you are both truthful people being honest..then why ...maybe your own insecurity..?
personally I dont hide from anyone or anything...regard less.. I am not a person to lie...so why would i hide ..or decieve..
for a future partner to do a check...basically telling me she did not believe me in the first place..?so wheres the trust..?
definite goodbye...with me anyway..those who lie always bring them self undone..wont stay hidden. my opinion...anyway..
hi eagle is the same her in australia...dont have to be married.. live with them 6 months..in a relationship..as defacto...not married.. still entitled to part possesion of the house if owned..or one of them is paying it off..?and superannuation..savings etc.. yes we do have plenty of greed related woman here..who do this sort of thing..?2-3 times..for money.. society...greed.selfish...me me me attitude..
EagleWoman: In the UK, nothing that happened BEFORE the marriage is permissable in the divorce courts. Even if you´ve been living together before getting married and you discover stuff that happened before you got married.
rohaan: I have a question for you, and I want you to think about it and be perfectly honest:
You find out that the guy you are dating has done a full investigation on YOU. You find that warm, sweet, loving and kind?
just asking....
my question/thought exactly roh
and my answer is in such a case the relationship would be over - altho I have a clean background - I will choose the time & place AND with whom and what information to share with others
it would permanently end the relationship - not negotaible
Bronze33: What do you think of full background checks on potential mates?
Very interesting. If you look at the breakdown of responses, the group who most believe it's a good way to protect oneself is women ages 18-40 at 67%. Men 18-40 have 0% in that category, with most responses in the "invasion of privacy" category.
Remember that the wording of the poll specifies "potential mate." This would not include someone with whom you are already "mated." Personally, I have done such checks. In the early days of my online dating experience, I ran a check on a man I had been communicating with for over 4 months. It's a good thing I did. He was a scammer. He had chosen the identity of a person who actually existed in the state of Maryland. He had a web site for his fake business. He said that he was going to do some business in Greece for a couple of weeks, but it was 10 days before he contacted me again. It was during this time that I ran the check. It's a good thing I did. He was off on just enough details that I became suspicious, so when he requested a "loan" of $1,800 for supplies to finish up his business so that he could hurry and get back to the states and come to meet me, instead of sending money, I asked questions. I refused to send the money and never heard from him again. I'm pretty sure that if I had sent the money, I still would have never heard from him again. I had no idea that scammers would spend 4 months priming a victim for the strike.
Would I run a check on someone I met face to face? Maybe. I feel that if someone feels it is an invasion of privacy to peruse public records, they probably have something to hide. Would I care if he ran a check on me? Absolutely not. I have nothing to hide, and would probably applaud his prudence.
and my answer is in such a case the relationship would be over - altho I have a clean background - I will choose the time & place AND with whom and what information to share with others
it would permanently end the relationship - not negotaible
Felix thing is.....
Unless they told you they had done the search....you wouldnt know anyway that it had been done
Unless they told you they had done the search....you wouldnt know anyway that it had been done
well the original question presumes knowledge.
but coincidentally there are actaully mistakes - locations (residences) for example in my background so I would be onto him most likely if he coughed up incorrect details or asked the wrong question but you make a good point - it's question I will be sure to ask - face to face
NAKEDMUDPEOPLE: If I have minor children in the home for the sake of their safety, I would absolutely have a background check done.
and here (to rivame and roh also) is why I know I am NOT going to meet someone online - I would never bring anyone into my home as a mate or potential mate whose background I do not know already. Ima small town girl
Bronze33: What do you think of full background checks on potential mates?
They aren't worth what you'd be charged, even IF they'd find the correct potential mate that you have identified. It would not be a nationwide search nor international unless you supplied fingerprints and blood sample. Like another poster, I too did a search on myself and found no records after 1978...anywhere, not even Scotland Yard!
felixis99: well the original question presumes knowledge. but coincidentally there are actaully mistakes - locations (residences) for example in my background so I would be onto him most likely if he coughed up incorrect details or asked the wrong question but you make a good point - it's question I will be sure to ask - face to face
as you suggested you did not physically meet this person... there is your answer ...itself..a potential mate is not even that until you have physically met several times....
why would you waste your time and effort on a fairy tale ... many men on here are/maybe in some peoples eyes.. potential partners..correct...are you going to do checks on all of them before you,contact.. At what point do you see a person as a potential partner..?
To me there not physically / mentally a potential partner until you actually meet face to face...several times and feel comfortable with each other to want to take it further.. being a partner...
why would you send money to someone you have never physically met..? dont know from a bar of soap..?.as you said you started to ask questions..and at which point you made a decision it was a scam...
but by asking the questions first...physically meeting ..face to face.. is the only way A person can have the potential to be partners..?
my thoughts...at what point do you class potential..?personally .. I like to meet several times see what develops...
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Having a full background check done on a potential mate...(Vote Below)