Do you think the U.S. should take a neutral stance regarding Israel. (264)
epirb: Neutral would be a good start , current US middle east policy has them and their allies on the wrong side fighting for the very worst of mankind if Islamists can be referred to as men .
Post last Gaza war America refused to resupply Israel with weapons , US eventually relented allowing resupply . This in the seventies led to a threat from Israel to use its nukes when the US would not resupply Israel . Resupply then in part led to the oil embargo AND more importantly for Israel understanding that the US is fickle . Its ironic that Israel would be refused re-supply post Gaza yet Saudi Arabia has its forces built up to a point now where the Saudi's are spending $ 15 billion more than the Russians on defence . Guess the pay to play payments worked well .
It certainly looks like the Syrians have captured a number of "security personal" including at least one American .
US is on the wrong side along with its allies , the only democracy in the middle east is at odds with current US policy , that could be about to change .
Post last Gaza war America refused to resupply Israel with weapons , US eventually relented allowing resupply . This in the seventies led to a threat from Israel to use its nukes when the US would not resupply Israel . Resupply then in part led to the oil embargo AND more importantly for Israel understanding that the US is fickle . Its ironic that Israel would be refused re-supply post Gaza yet Saudi Arabia has its forces built up to a point now where the Saudi's are spending $ 15 billion more than the Russians on defence . Guess the pay to play payments worked well .
It certainly looks like the Syrians have captured a number of "security personal" including at least one American .
US is on the wrong side along with its allies , the only democracy in the middle east is at odds with current US policy , that could be about to change .
Very true and disturbing. I have just listened to this journalist describing the real situation in Aleppo and giving a good description of the so called White Helmets with the funding these terrorists get from the Western governments - horrible!
The whole situation in Aleppo is absurd, the core of the problem being this irrational American (and the EU following suite) blinding hatred towards Russia. But knowing that these western gvts. are run by the PC "liberals", who out of their Christianophobia side with an utterly intolerant, misogynist force, I should not be surprised.
However, the mainstream media acting as the propaganda machine just does not cease to surprise me:
robplum: Trump's pick for ambassador to Israel has all sides on edge
Apart from the Israeli side , excusing their left wing who never like anything .
serene56: Maybe the US should mind their goddamn business and look after their own backyard
we're tryin lady,.. but the idiot neocons and neolefties are leaving a trail of destruction as they leave
office as well as trying to start a war with Russia.
epirb: Apart from the Israeli side , excusing their left wing who never like anything .
i saw 2 known NSA monitored honey pot sites where 1000's of SWJ anti semite jooo haters were
acting like wild islamos, no doubt stirred up and influenced by the failed marxist O'bozo media.
Fools they are since they probably cant even afford a VPN and will probably receive a nice stuxtnet
styled compooter killin virus,
Israel is Not going anywhere.
crayons: i saw 2 known NSA monitored honey pot sites where 1000's of SWJ anti semite jooo haters were
acting like wild islamos, no doubt stirred up and influenced by the failed marxist O'bozo media.
Fools they are since they probably cant even afford a VPN and will probably receive a nice stuxtnet
styled compooter killin virus,
Israel is Not going anywhere.
During the US primaries one GOP member said that the US will be having the protests in Iran and the celebrations in Israel . This will be so , current trick of Obama's and Kerry's looks like its backfiring on them a little . Putin and Erdogan setting up peace talks over Syria without the US present showing just how far Kerry is out of the loop . Obama won't be able to damage Syria's victory as he just has no time , and if he does let the rebels have Stinger as its being claimed , Israel will act against them if it can . US is on the wrong side .acting like wild islamos, no doubt stirred up and influenced by the failed marxist O'bozo media.
Fools they are since they probably cant even afford a VPN and will probably receive a nice stuxtnet
styled compooter killin virus,
Israel is Not going anywhere.
SoonerGal: why would the US take a neutral stance? Israel is surrounded by countries that hate her.... (beginning to understand that feeling) she is a democratic country....I think the US should stand behind her 100% however with the flake we have now, I don't see that happening
You are right. It was the U.S. that helped Israel after WWII through the U.N. which was also put into play after the war. We've always stood by Israel and they have continued to beat the odds they are surrounded by over the decades. They have formed successful coalitions with some of their neighbors. Sometimes those coalitions have eroded. Egypt withdrew it's resolution but co-sponsors pushed it from what I've read. Most of those co-sponsors aren't even in the immediate region nor have they dealt with Israel as long or through as many of the things Egypt has. They should have shut up and with drew along side Egypt.
Israel seems to be under bigger threat BECAUSE of the flake we have in charge now. It would be wrong for us to abandon yet another ally. Israel isn't a weakling nation while most of their battles and wars have been provoked. We've been their largest supporter but in that support, a large part of the "aid" we might give comes back to the U.S. in business form for certain supplies and upkeep. Betrayal would be good grounds to start out sourcing "business" else where and no one would be able to condemn them for it. Maybe Russia would pick up where we leave off but would be more trust worthy than what we have to offer now.
Going back to their 6 day war, if Israel truly wanted to banish any type of threat or considered every one a threat instead of practicing diplomacy when able, they could have easily removed any Mosques and such in their territory. They chose to build their temple in another part of the city instead. With in Israel; Muslims, Jews, and others would seem to live primarily peacefully and it's almost always out side forces that continually pose the largest threats. Now we can add things like the current U.S. government to that list until it's biggest problem is gone on January 20th, 2017.
Draegoneer: You are right. It was the U.S. that helped Israel after WWII through the U.N. which was also put into play after the war. We've always stood by Israel and they have continued to beat the odds they are surrounded by over the decades. They have formed successful coalitions with some of their neighbors. Sometimes those coalitions have eroded. Egypt withdrew it's resolution but co-sponsors pushed it from what I've read. Most of those co-sponsors aren't even in the immediate region nor have they dealt with Israel as long or through as many of the things Egypt has. They should have shut up and with drew along side Egypt.
Israel seems to be under bigger threat BECAUSE of the flake we have in charge now. It would be wrong for us to abandon yet another ally. Israel isn't a weakling nation while most of their battles and wars have been provoked. We've been their largest supporter but in that support, a large part of the "aid" we might give comes back to the U.S. in business form for certain supplies and upkeep. Betrayal would be good grounds to start out sourcing "business" else where and no one would be able to condemn them for it. Maybe Russia would pick up where we leave off but would be more trust worthy than what we have to offer now.
Going back to their 6 day war, if Israel truly wanted to banish any type of threat or considered every one a threat instead of practicing diplomacy when able, they could have easily removed any Mosques and such in their territory. They chose to build their temple in another part of the city instead. With in Israel; Muslims, Jews, and others would seem to live primarily peacefully and it's almost always out side forces that continually pose the largest threats. Now we can add things like the current U.S. government to that list until it's biggest problem is gone on January 20th, 2017.
Israel seems to be under bigger threat BECAUSE of the flake we have in charge now. It would be wrong for us to abandon yet another ally. Israel isn't a weakling nation while most of their battles and wars have been provoked. We've been their largest supporter but in that support, a large part of the "aid" we might give comes back to the U.S. in business form for certain supplies and upkeep. Betrayal would be good grounds to start out sourcing "business" else where and no one would be able to condemn them for it. Maybe Russia would pick up where we leave off but would be more trust worthy than what we have to offer now.
Going back to their 6 day war, if Israel truly wanted to banish any type of threat or considered every one a threat instead of practicing diplomacy when able, they could have easily removed any Mosques and such in their territory. They chose to build their temple in another part of the city instead. With in Israel; Muslims, Jews, and others would seem to live primarily peacefully and it's almost always out side forces that continually pose the largest threats. Now we can add things like the current U.S. government to that list until it's biggest problem is gone on January 20th, 2017.
Before it has a chance to get out of hand; I should clarify that there is a huge potential political game that can come from this. obama is once again shamed by Russia in his unreliability considering they allegedly "hacked" elections. Here was obama's chance to stand in their way and he not only back stabbed an ally but let an "opponent" win again.
Russia and China seem to do fairly well at picking up the pieces obozo leaves behind. While it would seem Russia is undermining Israel because Putin is allied with Iran and Syria at the moment, it leaves a potentially open door for a later date and time. Unless Trump has something planned, Israel could be a major pawn for now if it's put out far enough into limbo and partially controlled from else where.
There is this saying..
""""Someone offered with his fingers, a piece of food,to a hungry man,
and the hungry man attepted to eat his whole arm"".
Same with Israel.
Offered a certain piece of land and now they claim the whole Arabian peninsula.
""""Someone offered with his fingers, a piece of food,to a hungry man,
and the hungry man attepted to eat his whole arm"".
Same with Israel.
Offered a certain piece of land and now they claim the whole Arabian peninsula.
chris27292729: There is this saying..
""""Someone offered with his fingers, a piece of food,to a hungry man,
and the hungry man attepted to eat his whole arm"".
Same with Israel.
Offered a certain piece of land and now they claim the whole Arabian peninsula.
""""Someone offered with his fingers, a piece of food,to a hungry man,
and the hungry man attepted to eat his whole arm"".
Same with Israel.
Offered a certain piece of land and now they claim the whole Arabian peninsula.
So, like the Greek Cypriots then. with the same historical background.
rizlared: So, like the Greek Cypriots then. with the same historical background.
No comparison.
A handfull of jews before the ww2. amongst the Arab majority..
It seems you haven't be thrown out of the land you were born end see your property to be taken over,
just because the land controled by an imperial country,decided this land,has to be given to the jews.
chris27292729: No comparison.
A handfull of jews before the ww2. amongst the Arab majority..
It seems you haven't be thrown out of the land you were born end see your property to be taken over,
just because the land controled by an imperial country,decided this land,has to be given to the jews.
Good to see you identify with the Jews as they are back and now a force able to defend themselves .A handfull of jews before the ww2. amongst the Arab majority..
It seems you haven't be thrown out of the land you were born end see your property to be taken over,
just because the land controled by an imperial country,decided this land,has to be given to the jews.
Draegoneer: Before it has a chance to get out of hand; I should clarify that there is a huge potential political game that can come from this. obama is once again shamed by Russia in his unreliability considering they allegedly "hacked" elections. Here was obama's chance to stand in their way and he not only back stabbed an ally but let an "opponent" win again.
Russia and China seem to do fairly well at picking up the pieces obozo leaves behind. While it would seem Russia is undermining Israel because Putin is allied with Iran and Syria at the moment, it leaves a potentially open door for a later date and time. Unless Trump has something planned, Israel could be a major pawn for now if it's put out far enough into limbo and partially controlled from else where.
Russia and China seem to do fairly well at picking up the pieces obozo leaves behind. While it would seem Russia is undermining Israel because Putin is allied with Iran and Syria at the moment, it leaves a potentially open door for a later date and time. Unless Trump has something planned, Israel could be a major pawn for now if it's put out far enough into limbo and partially controlled from else where.
btw Crayola has mentioned that Putin and Trump are Christian and that is enough for him to forget all the bloody past of Russia-USA "relationship"
Recently, I watch a clip of Assad attending a Chistian-Catholic service in Syria!
Does the end justify the means?
rizlared: So, like the Greek Cypriots then. with the same historical background.
I am not very familiar with the Royal Family of England but wasn't a Greek the one whoo married the Queen of England (before having had the crown) so in a way there must be some "ties" with the Greeks, as a family.
By the way the puppet King O'dumbo just threw out all the russian diplomats
out of russia except for the ambassador over trumped up hacking charges
over wikileaks...what a frickin joke...was announced today they have to be
out by friday...
the bolshevic banksters/globalists really want war with russia...
out of russia except for the ambassador over trumped up hacking charges
over wikileaks...what a frickin joke...was announced today they have to be
out by friday...
the bolshevic banksters/globalists really want war with russia...
lifeisadream: What you will see is Trump helping Putin to get what Putin wants.
maybe Putin can help us get rid of Soros.
crayons: maybe Putin can help us get rid of Soros.
You might be surprised what Putin will help you getting rid of and Soros is a peanut for a squirrel yet I hope I am wrong.
Llifeisadream: btw Crayola has mentioned that Putin and Trump are Christian and that is enough for him to forget all the bloody past of Russia-USA "relationship"
Recently, I watch a clip of Assad attending a Chistian-Catholic service in Syria!
Does the end justify the means?
Recently, I watch a clip of Assad attending a Chistian-Catholic service in Syria!
Does the end justify the means?
Syria was part of the problem, along with Egypt, Jordan, and Palestinian terror attacks that led to Israel's 6 day war. The U.S. wanted to wait for U.N. Israel didn't have that long. Their "neighbors" wanted them annihilated and were already in position to do it. What they gained was "just". They did try being peaceful and still do when allowed.
As far as Christian goes, what does that say about something like obama when trying to use that term for world leaders?
It's not about forgetting the past. It's trying to improve from it. It's each leader's responsibility to put it's country and citizens first. Some leaders are monsters, some spineless, some marxists, some fair, strong, and more.
"Faith" based isn't a solid ground for a basis when it comes to humans AND the power some are granted. At the moment, there is no end or means. No one can tell the bad guys from the good guys as of yet.
I'm more concerned about how a leader is handling the affairs that come with the position. There are some "practices", politics and religious, that would rather destroy and control, than negotiate, deal, and stabilize jointly. Right now, I feel we're at ground zero in trying to re-establish who's who and for what purpose with reason.
Draegoneer: Syria was part of the problem, along with Egypt, Jordan, and Palestinian terror attacks that led to Israel's 6 day war. The U.S. wanted to wait for U.N. Israel didn't have that long. Their "neighbors" wanted them annihilated and were already in position to do it. What they gained was "just". They did try being peaceful and still do when allowed.
As far as Christian goes, what does that say about something like obama when trying to use that term for world leaders?
It's not about forgetting the past. It's trying to improve from it. It's each leader's responsibility to put it's country and citizens first. Some leaders are monsters, some spineless, some marxists, some fair, strong, and more.
"Faith" based isn't a solid ground for a basis when it comes to humans AND the power some are granted. At the moment, there is no end or means. No one can tell the bad guys from the good guys as of yet.
I'm more concerned about how a leader is handling the affairs that come with the position. There are some "practices", politics and religious, that would rather destroy and control, than negotiate, deal, and stabilize jointly. Right now, I feel we're at ground zero in trying to re-establish who's who and for what purpose with reason.
As far as Christian goes, what does that say about something like obama when trying to use that term for world leaders?
It's not about forgetting the past. It's trying to improve from it. It's each leader's responsibility to put it's country and citizens first. Some leaders are monsters, some spineless, some marxists, some fair, strong, and more.
"Faith" based isn't a solid ground for a basis when it comes to humans AND the power some are granted. At the moment, there is no end or means. No one can tell the bad guys from the good guys as of yet.
I'm more concerned about how a leader is handling the affairs that come with the position. There are some "practices", politics and religious, that would rather destroy and control, than negotiate, deal, and stabilize jointly. Right now, I feel we're at ground zero in trying to re-establish who's who and for what purpose with reason.
That is the problem!
The United States and Israel have always been friends. More then friends it is the purpose of NATO to keep peace among countries. The Egypt–Israel Peace Treaty was signed in Washington, D.C., United States on 26 March 1979, following the 1978 Camp David Accords. The Egypt–Israel treaty was signed by Egyptian president Anwar Sadat and Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin, and witnessed by United States president Jimmy Carter
NATO strives to secure a lasting peace in Europe, based on common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Since the outbreak of crises and conflicts beyond the borders of NATO member countries can jeopardize this objective, the Alliance also contributes to peace and stability through crisis management operations and partnerships. Essentially, NATO not only helps to defend the territory of its members, but engages where possible and when necessary to project its values further afield, prevent crises, manage crises, stabilize post-conflict situations and support reconstruction.
NATO also embodies the transatlantic link by which the security of North America is tied to the security of Europe. It is an intergovernmental organization which provides a forum where members can consult together on any issues they may choose to raise and take decisions on political and military matters affecting their security. No single member country is forced to rely soley on its national capabilities to meet its essential national security objectives. The resulting sense of shared security among members contributes to stability in the Euro-Atlantic area.
NATO’s fundamental security tasks are laid down in the Washington Treaty. They are sufficiently general to withstand the test of time and are translated into more detail in strategic concepts. Strategic concepts are the authoritative statement of the Alliance’s objectives and provide the highest level of guidance on the political and military means to be used in achieving these goals; they remain the basis for the implementation of Alliance policy as a whole.
NATO strives to secure a lasting peace in Europe, based on common values of individual liberty, democracy, human rights and the rule of law. Since the outbreak of crises and conflicts beyond the borders of NATO member countries can jeopardize this objective, the Alliance also contributes to peace and stability through crisis management operations and partnerships. Essentially, NATO not only helps to defend the territory of its members, but engages where possible and when necessary to project its values further afield, prevent crises, manage crises, stabilize post-conflict situations and support reconstruction.
NATO also embodies the transatlantic link by which the security of North America is tied to the security of Europe. It is an intergovernmental organization which provides a forum where members can consult together on any issues they may choose to raise and take decisions on political and military matters affecting their security. No single member country is forced to rely soley on its national capabilities to meet its essential national security objectives. The resulting sense of shared security among members contributes to stability in the Euro-Atlantic area.
NATO’s fundamental security tasks are laid down in the Washington Treaty. They are sufficiently general to withstand the test of time and are translated into more detail in strategic concepts. Strategic concepts are the authoritative statement of the Alliance’s objectives and provide the highest level of guidance on the political and military means to be used in achieving these goals; they remain the basis for the implementation of Alliance policy as a whole.
secret agent must believe that drivel
or she wouldnt have posted it.
In reality the UN is a criminal consortium of puppets
used today for the entertainment and profit the NWO.
or she wouldnt have posted it.
In reality the UN is a criminal consortium of puppets
used today for the entertainment and profit the NWO.
chris27292729: No comparison.
A handfull of jews before the ww2. amongst the Arab majority..
It seems you haven't be thrown out of the land you were born end see your property to be taken over,
just because the land controled by an imperial country, decided this land, has to be given to the jews.
A handfull of jews before the ww2. amongst the Arab majority..
It seems you haven't be thrown out of the land you were born end see your property to be taken over,
just because the land controled by an imperial country, decided this land, has to be given to the jews.
Like many, you only listen to one side of a very big and multifaceted story.
It might be useful to look into the history of the Jewish people, you may find that their roots are somewhat similar to those of todays Arabs.
Why do you think Jerusalem is so important to Judaism?
Also remember that Judaism started almost 2000 years before Christianity, in the regions which are known today as Syria/Palestine. This is a proven fact and cannot be disputed. The ownership of those lands, however, has been many and confused, which is why we still have the problem today.
lifeisadream: That is the problem!
Saudi Arabia and other suppliers had the U.S. cut and dried in the earlier 2000's. Our reserves helped a lot.
If Trump can get half of what he wants, the U.S will gain much more independence away from foreign imported resources.
That would erase a lot of politics, deal from a position of true strength, and give cause to actual "talks" instead of much of what ever is going on now.
Can it truly help with peace and co-operation is the big question. The bottom line is that we are not in control of other countries over all. For every thing we might step away from, there is another country ready to "cash in" regardless of what might be happening. Maybe the only control we have would be the loss of our "contributions". That might be good if we're a primary, but we're never the "only".
War, if necessary, will never be taken off of the table any where. A realization that has to be acknowledged. It's not just pertaining to the U.S either. With the dirty pool of politics, for what ever we might know and learn, there is always more that runs even deeper. There isn't much we can do over all except what we normally do for the obvious.
The U.S. has recall rights for bad leaders and representatives. Good luck on getting enough unity and motivation to use any of it. A sad but true example. Even when the people have the power, no one knows how, why, or when to use it. Yet will later ask and wonder how things got so bad.
Regardless of how things unfold, hopefully for the good this time, we're still going to be stuck. Some how, I think always powerless for a while to come. We'll still be tracking and pondering, etc.
Draegoneer: Saudi Arabia and other suppliers had the U.S. cut and dried in the earlier 2000's. Our reserves helped a lot.
If Trump can get half of what he wants, the U.S will gain much more independence away from foreign imported resources.
That would erase a lot of politics, deal from a position of true strength, and give cause to actual "talks" instead of much of what ever is going on now.
Can it truly help with peace and co-operation is the big question. The bottom line is that we are not in control of other countries over all. For every thing we might step away from, there is another country ready to "cash in" regardless of what might be happening. Maybe the only control we have would be the loss of our "contributions". That might be good if we're a primary, but we're never the "only".
War, if necessary, will never be taken off of the table any where. A realization that has to be acknowledged. It's not just pertaining to the U.S either. With the dirty pool of politics, for what ever we might know and learn, there is always more that runs even deeper. There isn't much we can do over all except what we normally do for the obvious.
The U.S. has recall rights for bad leaders and representatives. Good luck on getting enough unity and motivation to use any of it. A sad but true example. Even when the people have the power, no one knows how, why, or when to use it. Yet will later ask and wonder how things got so bad.
Regardless of how things unfold, hopefully for the good this time, we're still going to be stuck. Some how, I think always powerless for a while to come. We'll still be tracking and pondering, etc.
If Trump can get half of what he wants, the U.S will gain much more independence away from foreign imported resources.
That would erase a lot of politics, deal from a position of true strength, and give cause to actual "talks" instead of much of what ever is going on now.
Can it truly help with peace and co-operation is the big question. The bottom line is that we are not in control of other countries over all. For every thing we might step away from, there is another country ready to "cash in" regardless of what might be happening. Maybe the only control we have would be the loss of our "contributions". That might be good if we're a primary, but we're never the "only".
War, if necessary, will never be taken off of the table any where. A realization that has to be acknowledged. It's not just pertaining to the U.S either. With the dirty pool of politics, for what ever we might know and learn, there is always more that runs even deeper. There isn't much we can do over all except what we normally do for the obvious.
The U.S. has recall rights for bad leaders and representatives. Good luck on getting enough unity and motivation to use any of it. A sad but true example. Even when the people have the power, no one knows how, why, or when to use it. Yet will later ask and wonder how things got so bad.
Regardless of how things unfold, hopefully for the good this time, we're still going to be stuck. Some how, I think always powerless for a while to come. We'll still be tracking and pondering, etc.
"If Trump can get half of what he wants, the U.S will gain much more independence away from foreign imported resources. "
What is it that Trump wants?
lifeisadream:
What is it that Trump wants?
What is it that Trump wants?
More money (to pay off the loan sharks )
rizlared: More money (to pay off the loan sharks )
No doubt, Trump's personal interests are (in) his game yet my question was considering the "common good" of USA if that is possible.
lifeisadream: No doubt, Trump's personal interests are (in) his game yet my question was considering the "common good" of USA if that is possible.
Trumps "common good" is for Trump lol
PS if you get a really nice bottle of wine, for your upcoming dinner party, your guests will appreciate the gesture, and because you all partake in sharing it, no pressure is made for them to return the favour.
rizlared: Trumps "common good" is for Trump lol
PS if you get a really nice bottle of wine, for your upcoming dinner party, your guests will appreciate the gesture, and because you all partake in sharing it, no pressure is made for them to return the favour.
PS if you get a really nice bottle of wine, for your upcoming dinner party, your guests will appreciate the gesture, and because you all partake in sharing it, no pressure is made for them to return the favour.
When ever I think of Trump I will always think of "a bull in a china store"
It was good that the subject of my in-laws was brought out (or is it up?) because my son's sister in law is home for a few days, so I should invite them for dinner before she goes back to another state because of her work (Anthropology) and one or two bottles of wine will be ready for that 8 persons' dinner
lifeisadream: "If Trump can get half of what he wants, the U.S will gain much more independence away from foreign imported resources. "
What is it that Trump wants?
What is it that Trump wants?
U.S. Independence. A working economy, less meddling in world affairs, support of our allies, improved educational system, and better security for the nation. There's more with a lot more detail. We had it as a larger part in the past. It can go even further. It's late and I have to work later so please accept the summarized version with a strong idea of the troubles to come summarized in the sentences below. Take care Dream.
What some people neglect to realize, is that he's going to have to deal with a lot of "politics" riddled with many back stabbers still loyal to lobbyists, banks, corporations, and more. A questionable population that hasn't figured out we're not the center or able to supply full financial support for the entire planet doesn't help either. I don't see much of it falling into line very easily at all at this time.
Draegoneer:
U.S. Independence.
A working economy,
less meddling in world affairs,
support of our allies,
improved educational system,
and better security for the nation.
There's more with a lot more detail. We had it as a larger part in the past. It can go even further. It's late and I have to work later so please accept the summarized version with a strong idea of the troubles to come summarized in the sentences below. Take care Dream.
What some people neglect to realize, is that he's going to have to deal with a lot of "politics" riddled with many back stabbers still loyal to lobbyists, banks, corporations, and more. A questionable population that hasn't figured out we're not the center or able to supply full financial support for the entire planet doesn't help either. I don't see much of it falling into line very easily at all at this time.
U.S. Independence.
A working economy,
less meddling in world affairs,
support of our allies,
improved educational system,
and better security for the nation.
There's more with a lot more detail. We had it as a larger part in the past. It can go even further. It's late and I have to work later so please accept the summarized version with a strong idea of the troubles to come summarized in the sentences below. Take care Dream.
What some people neglect to realize, is that he's going to have to deal with a lot of "politics" riddled with many back stabbers still loyal to lobbyists, banks, corporations, and more. A questionable population that hasn't figured out we're not the center or able to supply full financial support for the entire planet doesn't help either. I don't see much of it falling into line very easily at all at this time.
Thanks for your reply and it is late indeed I will reply some other time.
More Threads
The weird and the random facts around the world
wanting beyond need
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Ladies
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
s*xual skills
Unions support Democrats!
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
your favorite topic?
men's perspective towards women
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
Please comment on whether Israel should fight its own battles or whether the US should keep intervening on their behalf.
Post last Gaza war America refused to resupply Israel with weapons , US eventually relented allowing resupply . This in the seventies led to a threat from Israel to use its nukes when the US would not resupply Israel . Resupply then in part led to the oil embargo AND more importantly for Israel understanding that the US is fickle . Its ironic that Israel would be refused re-supply post Gaza yet Saudi Arabia has its forces built up to a point now where the Saudi's are spending $ 15 billion more than the Russians on defence . Guess the pay to play payments worked well .
It certainly looks like the Syrians have captured a number of "security personal" including at least one American .
US is on the wrong side along with its allies , the only democracy in the middle east is at odds with current US policy , that could be about to change .