Googl hasn't helped me and I was obviously naive to think you would. I said no provocation! Have I given you any hard time here since the wall issue started? No. So, why this passive-aggressive response?
And how do you consider all the sides when you choose to ignore sources?
BTW it was just a day or two ago that you again said something about migrants going to Germany to work - have you offered any statistics? Have you countered the numbers Krema gave you? If you cannot, I suggest you check Norwegian national stats (which I posted long time ago when th mass immigration started, but of course, no facts were good) which gives you an accurate % in work force by country of origin - devastating truth, i.e. if truth is of interest to you.
Not sure this is true. This morning I read an article about the presidents rights to do what he has, something like he is entitled to ban whoever he deems dangerous - it was included in yahoo news feed, cannot remember which paper was the source and cannot find it now.
As for the judges - if they are anything like the ones in Europe, we know which ideology they represent.
I know. Whatever he does must be wrong mantra. Remember how everyone was screaming how wrong/undiplomatic/unpresidential it was for him to say Merkel had made a catastrophic mistake, now when she lectures him on who he could/could not let enter his country, the same people are praising her.
I keep on being suprised again and again at such blindness and utter lack of common sense.
Whatever! If you choose not understand, your problem. If you are entitled to be frustrated and throw language-related insults because you need to repeat something, then the others are entitled to feel frustrated, too, which was exactly how I felt when I saw someone demand a source and never offers any of theirs.
Plus, if you are lecturing me on how to argue, well, read that post once again - that was not an argument, but a comment.
Haha, if you want proof, go back through the threads and while you are at it, you may want to check those youtube videos/documentaries/talks by one of the world's most recognized philosophers that I posted and you never bothered to check.
Sure, I don't have a clue bout what "academia" is, only you know. As a matter of fact it was about a week or two ago that I posted a link, or was it even an embedded vid that I finally can post, of a psychologist talking exactly about that, look for it, I won't.
Has anyone noticed that some threads do not appear on the forum home page even when you order the threads by the latest post? Seems the ones having the name of Trump and Islamic something are banned from the home page, I had to go to the current events section to see them. Anyone else?
Totally agree that visitors from those 3 should be vetted too, but let's admit it - those 3 countries do not produce "refugees". Well, Saudis take in non, either
Exactly! We have posted many statistical reports here, I have pointed to the official EU stats, too, no one bothered to read. Only for this reason did I ask "the lot" to finally show their sources.
Oh, and BTW the education systems are different, the BA in the old system the Bologna system was different - now, the Bologna MA is officially equal to the old BA based on the length, the content, the requirements etc.
But again that does not matter, one can have all th titles possible and still have no common sense.
Sure, bash me all you want - the fact is that it is tiresome that the open door people do not give any proof, and this has been happening here ever since I got involved in this forum - so that was my reaction. The lot I referred to in particular is all about emotions and even when they claim something and you ask for evidence they do not care, so why should the ones with the opposing view.
Life, I am talking about this exactly - I have posted youtube videos for the same reason, the video that were actually documentaries made by e.g. ZDF or BBC but you have never accepted that, you have always looked down upon youtube link even though I did tell you what the source was.
Pamela Geller - look down upon her as much as you want, she was the first to report on Cologne rapes! I know she adds a liitle flavour to the stories, but so does CNN and the co. - only they are more to your liking.
As for scientific journals - haha I do have to laugh about that, again your way of exerting superiority (I keep on forgetting that those who think differently are not educated and don't have a clue about anything), I have posted links to some researches, studies conducted by scientists, I have also posted official statistics, but alas, when they say something contrary to your beliefs, you just ignore them.
BTW - the academia today is totally out of touch with reality, so posting some pc BS is worse than posting Geller, she speaks from experience.
Why does "current events...." thread NOT show when you open the forum? I had to choose the category itself, posted a comment and the thread is still not visible on the Forum home page. The same everywhere? Are the mods imposing censorship?
Sure, quoting is fine and should be done, however, when you discard certain sources without even reading or watching, well..... How many times have you simply rejected even watching documentaries which were originally from the sources your do trust and your rejection was based only on the "argument" that they were on youtube?
The ones that you accuse of referring to "the wrong" sources are the usually the ones that follow both the established media and the media you do not like. I certainly do and find that the truth is most likely somewhere in the middle.
Capricorn143 Forum Posts (1,115)
RE: Extreme Vetting for Refugees