Capricorn143 Forum Posts (1,115)

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

Millions for the camps versus billions on fewer people transporting them into other countries. As long as a little something makes some people feel good about themselves.

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

Plus my response was to Raphael's claim that I was not telling the truth. If I hate something it is lying!

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

If showing the facts is using anti Syrian rhetoric, then so be it! I have every right to show the facts, as much as you have the right to turn the blind eye to them.

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

Oh really? And how do you know?



Hotels will be expected to provide up to three meals a day. It states the government will reimburse up to $15 per person for breakfast, $16 for lunch and $30 for dinner.

RE: GERMANY ,,, WHERE ARE WE NOW ? ,,,,, GOES ON !!!

Kaet, do tell us what clever things Merkel shared in her address last night?

When are you guys finally going to get rid of her???

RE: GERMANY ,,, WHERE ARE WE NOW ? ,,,,, GOES ON !!!

Two trains stations in Munich were evacuated last night over the Islamist bomb threat.

Our new lifestyle in Europe

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

Did you know that a homeless person in Canada gets 3 dollars a day for food, and a Syrian refugee gets 61 dollars?

RE: GERMANY ,,, WHERE ARE WE NOW ? ,,,,, GOES ON !!!

China will send 5000 elite soldiers to Syria to fight against IS. China has also promised 30 bil dollars to the Syrian government to be used for the country's reconstruction.



Turkey has the biggest problem with China entering Syrian war, as Turkey has been accused of supporting Muslims from a Chinese region - Uiguren - not sure what this is in English, these want to establish their own Moslim state there.

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

On his Christmas holidays Obama palys golf with the radical Islamist leader, the prime minister of Malasyia

RE: GERMANY ,,, WHERE ARE WE NOW ? ,,,,, GOES ON !!!

ZDF to broadcst Merkel's New Year's address to the people with subtitles in Arabic and English

No wonder the newcomers do not want to learn German, why should they?

RE: GERMANY ,,, WHERE ARE WE NOW ? ,,,,, GOES ON !!!

Pegida hymn Gemeinsam sind wir stark (together we are strong) more popular than Adelle's Hello:

RE: what percentage women are alcohol consumer over there?

The pubs Ali ...or fresh air in general

RE: More migrants?

1. I agree with you that they should stay in their own countries. And this is something the Europeans are to blame for as they give out their citizenship to whoever comes in.

2. You say only the desperate ones leave their country - how do you explain that in 2015 the "desperate" ones included 80% young, healthy men?

Why do not they do something to improve their own countries? Or are they doing whatever it is called in Kuran - spreading Islam to non-muslim countries?

To us it seems like they come here to go on living the way they used to, they in fact insist on living that way but on our welfare.

3. You also say they cannot adapt to our ways - why do not they flee to similar, Muslim countries?

But I agree with you that the culture gap is too big and that it is difficult for them to adapt - again I blame the Europeans for not setting clear rules and I think we can agree that everyone who committs a crime or even a minor offence should be kicked out of Europe regardless of where he/she lands.

RE: what percentage women are alcohol consumer over there?

Any women allowed in them?

RE: Would Hillary Clinton make a great President

I bet she knows about the US plot to evacuate ISIS leaders from Ramadi:



Sorry, if already posted

RE: Trump leads by 20 points

Americans think twice before you vote or you may get what we have here in Europe:

!Plant-die-EU-Internierungslager-f%C3%BCr-Asylkritiker-/cjds/567bd85f0cf2ee60dd748914

Some exerpts from the article above:

The EU will monitor "intolerant citizens." Adolescents and adults, who do not meet the EU requirements for "tolerance" should be re-educated. The right to freedom of expression in Europe is thus severely restricted. It threatens to impose a total Orwellian dictatorship in the style of the former USSR.

A draft of a new "monitoring program" of its "intolerant citizens" has been presented to the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) of the European Parliament by the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR).

With the clever title "European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance", the disturbing proposal would oblige European governments to monitor citizens who are considered to be "intolerant". This could therefore lead to a ban on all criticism against Islam asylum policy or feminism.

According to critical observers this statute provides an "unprecedented threat to the fundamental right to freedom of speech" and could ultimately lead to a severe restriction of the right to freedom of expression in Europe because it would prohibit some critical voices against Islam and Islamic law, the Sharia.

The proposal gets even better: The draft is states: "Members of vulnerable or disadvantaged groups will not enjoy any additional rights to the general protection to which the Government of each person is obligated within the state." Behind this is the demand that the right to free opinion manifestation of Europe's citizens must be limited so that no "additional" rights of minorities are affected by "intolerant" remarks. The mere satire would be prohibited. Again, "Big Brother", coupled with bureaucracy: The framework statute calls for the establishment of a "special administrative unit" in each of the 28 EU Member States, which is to supervise the enforcement and compliance of the Statute. This unit should be under be directly under the Ministry of Justice of a country and may impose penalties.

In addition to that each country is to create a "National Commission for monitoring of tolerance" to "promote tolerance". The draft also calls for the "re-education" of people who are classified as intolerant. "Those who have committed crimes and have been sentenced as teenagers are obliged to undergo a rehabilitation program which will instill a culture of tolerance into them." Schools should "require and encourage students to accept difference and diversity and to promote a climate of tolerance for the qualities and cultures of others. "

RE: More migrants?

This is beyond comprehension and if it is true then it is the end of free speech in Europe:

!Plant-die-EU-Internierungslager-f%C3%BCr-Asylkritiker-/cjds/567bd85f0cf2ee60dd748914

Some exerpts from the article above:

The EU will monitor "intolerant citizens." Adolescents and adults, who do not meet the EU requirements for "tolerance" should be re-educated. The right to freedom of expression in Europe is thus severely restricted. It threatens to impose a total Orwellian dictatorship in the style of the former USSR.

A draft of a new "monitoring program" of its "intolerant citizens" has been presented to the European Parliament Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) of the European Parliament by the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR).

With the clever title "European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance", the disturbing proposal would oblige European governments to monitor citizens who are considered to be "intolerant". This could therefore lead to a ban on all criticism against Islam asylum policy or feminism.

According to critical observers this statute provides an "unprecedented threat to the fundamental right to freedom of speech" and could ultimately lead to a severe restriction of the right to freedom of expression in Europe because it would prohibit some critical voices against Islam and Islamic law, the Sharia.

The proposal gets even better: The draft is states: "Members of vulnerable or disadvantaged groups will not enjoy any additional rights to the general protection to which the Government of each person is obligated within the state." Behind this is the demand that the right to free opinion manifestation of Europe's citizens must be limited so that no "additional" rights of minorities are affected by "intolerant" remarks. The mere satire would be prohibited. Again, "Big Brother", coupled with bureaucracy: The framework statute calls for the establishment of a "special administrative unit" in each of the 28 EU Member States, which is to supervise the enforcement and compliance of the Statute. This unit should be under be directly under the Ministry of Justice of a country and may impose penalties.

In addition to that each country is to create a "National Commission for monitoring of tolerance" to "promote tolerance". The draft also calls for the "re-education" of people who are classified as intolerant. "Those who have committed crimes and have been sentenced as teenagers are obliged to undergo a rehabilitation program which will instill a culture of tolerance into them." Schools should "require and encourage students to accept difference and diversity and to promote a climate of tolerance for the qualities and cultures of others. "

RE: More migrants?

What happened to the Viking genes in today's male population in Scandinavia? Seems like they went in the completely opposite direction in Swedes as they are the champions of welcome refugees policy.
The Danes are doing something, at least their ruling party is, what about Norwegians? I have heard Hemsedal is full of "refugees"? Hege Storhaug didn't even make to be nominated for the name of the year after having many more votes than the second candidate. What happened?

RE: Would Hillary Clinton make a great President

he Canadians on CS and I guess the rest of them must have been living in a bubble, seems like they desperately want want more diversity - hey guys we would be glad if you took them all from Europe

RE: Would Donald Trump make a good President

2 what? Elitest regressive liberals?

RE: Would Hillary Clinton make a great President

And then on top of that give him Nobel prize without him having done anything to deserve it, he has inhereted his skin colour, he didn't have to work for it

RE: Would Hillary Clinton make a great President

I haven't voted as I am not an American. HOWEVER, the fact that she is a woman should be completely irrelevant

RE: More migrants?

Do you think there won't be any violence if we just give in? Well, our destrucitons will last shorter than if we put up some fight. The moment you start thinking nothing can be done, it is the end for us We need to copy the Israelis in how to defend ourselves and the Japanese how to treat the migrants

RE: How important is physical attraction when looking for a spouse?

Agreed. And it applies to all age groups

Do your duty first, then claim your rights

Hi Lindsey

I guess their needs are bigger (and more important)

The other big issue is the health insurance: regular citizens must pay for the insurance, and if they want to cover say dental services, they have to pay even more. These asylum seekers' health insurance covers everything, plus they jump every line if they need surgery or a check up with a specialist. A superior category of people....well it is inline with what their religion says

Do your duty first, then claim your rights

True that Joy

But at least if/when the authorities find out about the fraud, they can do something about it - confiscate the money or goods or/and expell them from the country.

I believe giving the social benefits for free is the worst we can do

Do your duty first, then claim your rights

he numbers for Slovenia refer to monthy payments.

Do your duty first, then claim your rights

Obviously our states spend a lot more on the immigrants/refugees than on their own citizens:

British old age pensioner - yearly benefit: 6.000 pounds (after paying taxes and contributing to the society for 40 to 60 years.)

Immigrant/refugee - total yearly benefit: 29.900 pounds

Slovenian old age pensioner with a minimum pension receives a bit less than 600 euors (again after 40 years of paying taxes and contributing to the society)

A foreigner with the status of an asyulm seeker (refugee/immigrant) receives a bit less than 900 euros.

Why is this difference in favour of those who have never contributed anything to the host country? What is the situation in your country?

RE: IS THE MEDIA TELLING YOU THE TRUTH?

Check out Jean-Baptiste KIm's videos on his facebook page to see what the media are not showing.

Do your duty first, then claim your rights

Oxymoron by a moron
You how it goes: the liberals don't have to have any arguments or proof, when they say something is true, then it is