Beautiful, it's such a magical place. Looking back in the opposite direction is Rannoch Moor. Running across the moor is the famous West Highland Line which links Glasgow on the Firth of Clyde, to Mallaig on the west coast, via Fort William, probably one of the finest railway journeys in the world.
There could have been another massacre in Glencoe if Jimmy Saville hadn't died. He lived there for quite some time up to his death. If I'm not mistaken, I think Prince Charles visited him there at one point.
The Scottish Highland are the jewel in the crown of the British Isles. Just to the right of that pic a few miles down the road is Glencoe, probably the best known valley in the Uk.
It would seem natural immunity as a result of contracting the illness gives better and longer lasting protection than the vaccine. Of course, assuming the vaccine is safe, topping that immunity up with the vaccine could be seen as a reasonable extra precaution. There is quite a difference in the lengh of protection with the different vaccines, Johnson & Johnson giving a considerably shorter period of protection than the other vaccines being used. But in extensive tests none of the vaccines provided as much and as long lasting protection and antibodies than natural immunity.
I would recommend anyone who has doubts about the vaccine to watch some of this doctors videos, or even follow his youtube channel. He goes into great detail and thoroughly examines mainly peer reviewed articles. His videos are usually 20 minutes or so and are very well and professionally presented. He is very much pro vaccine.
I'm not anti-vac, the point I'm trying to make is, given the known risks, it should be an individuals choice as to whether aspiation is carried out and all medical staff administering the vaccine should be fully aware of the process. imo.
It seem the medical profession is divided over this issue, but some are in favour of asperation....
Wrongly administering COVID-19 vaccines into blood vessels instead of the muscles could be behind the serious side effects, some studies have suggested.
An Aug. 2 report published by the Journal of Korean Medical Sciences is one of the first in the country to suggest that technique known as aspiration -- which is pulling back on the syringe plunger before injecting the vaccine to ensure no blood vessel is accidentally punctured -- may provide better chances of avoiding side effects.
The report looked at Korea’s first and only fatal case of a rare blood clotting condition called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, or TTS, in a 33-year-old man who received AstraZeneca’s vaccine. He died 19 days following his first vaccination in June, after developing blood clots in the brain called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
In making the suggestion, the report cited a June 29 preprint of an animal model study highlighting intravenous injection as a trigger for autoimmune reactions targeting platelets, which may result in TTS.
The preprint referenced in the paper, authored by German researchers, pointed to accidental intravenous injection as a “potential mechanism for post-vaccination TTS.”
“Hence, intramuscular injection, with aspiration prior to injection, could be a potential preventive measure when administering adenovirus-based vaccines,” it said.
There are many cases of people asking when they are being vaccinated for the injection to be aspirated. It seems that quite often the medical person administering the vaccine does not know what that means and in some cases refusing outright to asperate. Is it any wonder there are so many cases of blood clots after vaccination (and there are many) when medical staff, or in some cases non-medical staff are ignorant towards the most basic methods of vaccination.
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
Albert Einstein
The fact remains, for good reasons many people are unsure about the long term effects of the vaccine.
Johns Hopkins University of Medecine Coronavirus Research Centre
Phase III Clinical Trials to Assess Safety and Efficacy
Phase III clinical trials are critical to understanding whether vaccines are safe and effective. Phase III trials often include tens of thousands of volunteers. Participants are chosen at random to receive the vaccine or a placebo. In Phase III, participants and most of the study investigators do not know who has received the vaccine and who received the placebo. Participants are then followed to see how many in each group get the disease. Assessing short- and long-term safety is also a major goal of phase 3 trials.
ACCELERATED Phase 3 trials may take six to nine months to allow early assessment of safety and efficacy, particularly if conducted in areas with a high risk of infection, but with follow-up continuing for two years or more to assess long-term safety and efficacy.
bodleing2 Forum Posts (6,132)
RE: How to deal with feminists
I guess many of those decrying feminism are greatly influenced by Jordan Peterson, the ultimate mysogynist.