Firstly, my condolences. Hardly enough said but there is nothing I can say that would be appropriate.
In response to your question ...
If I were considering having children with someone who's child had passed I would first have to consider what caused the first passing. I'm not asking that you divulge the specifics in a public forum. I just think that if it was something of a genetic nature I would have more cause for concern than if it was a result of some sort of random event such as an accident, catching something from another etc.
The passing of a child certainly changes someone's persepctives (I can only assume because I have no personal experience to go on) and it becomes a big part of who they are. If I was drawn to them it's part of their makeup and who they are so it wouldn't exclude me from dating someone who had lost a child based on just the fact that they had.
This is all based on the perspective of one person who hasn't lost a child or had a relatonship of a romantic nature with anyone who has.
For philosophical purposes only, not to rile or offend Christians ... what if ... and having said that I specifically invite Spagooch, ArhturDent, Pucks, Lorraine, WildOrchid and any other Christians/Catholics to at least ponder the idea from an academic standpoint ...
What if that's the extent of who he was? Jesus of Nazareth.
So much done in the name of Christ, what if he was just Jesus.
By cross-posting your rhetoric through half the threads on the forum?
Seeing as how you're bringing up mail why not point out that I said I avoid your posts to avoid these sorts of incidents where you replied that you'll post whatever you want and didn't care.
Trying with 1 hand and typing to every thread you can think of about me with the other. Quite the multitasker.
gibsonish Forum Posts (1,404)
Jesus of Nazareth
I haven't been banned just yet so I'll pose an additional query ...Working on the hypothetical that Jesus was just Jesus of Nazareth would he have said a word had he seen the outcome?