breadcrumb Willy3411 Blog
ConnectingSingles® Toggle navigation menu
Home
Search
Advanced Search Quick Search Username Search Site Search Browse by Location More Searches...
Lists
Online Now New Members Photo Gallery Local Members My Favorites More Lists...
My Matches Meet Me
My Profile
View Profile Edit Profile Edit Settings Upload Photos My Account (more edits)
Inbox
Mail Inbox Mail Outbox Likes eCards Inbox Who's Viewed Me Who's Favorited Me My Favorites Blocked List Block Settings Compose a Message Compose a Like Compose an eCard
Articles Forums Blogs Polls Poems Videos Music Movies Books Recipes eCards Quizzes
Sitemap
Login Join Now, it's FREE
Articles Blogs Forums Polls Poems Recipes eCards Games Puzzles Videos Music Movies Books Quizzes
More
Profile Reviews Shopping Groups Group Forums Tags Singles Events Venues Vlogs Top 10 Lists Top 100
  1. All Blogs
  2. Willy3411 Profile
  3. Willy3411 Blogs

Willy3411Willy3411 Blog (1,129)

1,129 Blog1,129 Blogs1,035 Blog Comments3 Videos1 Quizzes

Sham Jan 6th Panel Paying Staffers Double What Regular House Staffers Make – Here Are Their Salaries

It's easy to get people to lie when you pay them more than double what they would normally earn.

The sham Jan 6th panel has made its staffers a lot of money since it started.

They have spent over $2.5 million in taxpayer funds so far — and many of the staffers have made over $10,000 a month for their role.

KRISTIN L. AMERLING – $15,666/month
DAVID B. BUCKLEY – $15,666/month
TIMOTHY J. HEAPHY – $15,666.67/month
THOMAS E. JOSCELYN – $15,416/month
WILLIAM C. DANVERS – $14,491/month
STEPHEN W. DEVINE – $14,491/month
TIMOTHY R. MULVEY – $14,166/month
CANDYCE D. PHOENIX – $14,166/month
LISA A. BIANCO – $13,333/month
SOUMYALATHA O. DAYANANDA – $12,916/month

DANIEL A. GEORGE – $12,916/month
MARC S. HARRIS – $12,916/month
SEAN P. TONOLLI – $12,916/month
AMANDA S. WICK – $12,916/month
JOHN F. WOOD – $12,916/month
TEMIDAYO AGANGA-WILLIAMS – $12,083/month
ALEJANDRA APECECHEA – $12,083/month
MARCUS CHILDRESS – $12,083/month

MEGHAN E. CONROY – $12,083/month
KEVIN S. ELLIKER – $12,083/month
JACOB H. GLICK – $12,083/month
CASEY E. LUCIER – $12,083/month
ROBIN M. PEGUERO – $12,083/month
SEAN M. QUINN – $12,083/month
JOSHUA D. ROSELMAN – $12,083/month
JAMES N. SASSO – $12,083/month

The spending isn’t over yet.

They are on track to spend $8 million this year — all to go after President Donald Trump and his allies.

According to a Congressional aide familiar with the Committee’s expenditures, it is also on track to spend $8 million this year.

There are 51 staffers working for the Committee who have salaries that average more than double what average House staffers make, coming in at $124,416 compared to the average staffer’s salary of $59,000.

GOP Rep Rodney Davis, the ranking member on the House Administration Committee announced that once the Republican party takes back control of the House an investigation into the Jan 6th committee will take place.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/06/sham-jan-6th-panel-staffers-making-double-regular-house-staffers-make-salaries/
Post Comment

Democrat hysteria undermines Jan 6 hearing

Despite bombshell claims in the Left-leaning media that Trump ‘was at the center’ and to be blamed for the Jan 6 ‘carnage’, last night’s ‘first hearing’ of the House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack proved disappointingly flat.

The event was treated like a blockbuster film, with blanket coverage on all major networks. This was the first of at least six hearings scheduled just for the month of June, and it was heralded by Democrats with the promise of “unseen” footage and Hollywood-style production values that would excite and enliven what is, by now, somewhat old news.

Calling it the “first hearing” is something of a misnomer, however, because the House already held hearings, in July 2021, in which Capitol Police officers exhaustively detailed their defence of the Capitol building. But it’s the nature of political spectacle to demand the revelation of continually fresh horrors, even if they add nothing new.

What was on display at these hearings was tame. Yes, people marched on the Capitol and knocked over metal barriers. Yes, at least one window was broken and protestors clambered through it. Rioters tangled with police, and some officers were evidently injured. The mob did stream through the Capitol building, and Congress did adjourn for a few hours, before reconvening to finish its business of certifying the 2020 election, after the would-be insurrectionists went home.

Is that… it? One would expect, given the ubiquity of cameras today that they would have scraped up some evidence that January 6 really was as violent and dismal as we’ve been told, constantly, since it happened. In order to be shocked by video of cops and protestors in a scrum, pushing each other, with occasional punches or kicks, one would have to pretend that the summer of 2020, when violent riots resulted in thousands of police injuries and billions of dollars of damage by fire, had never happened. Certainly, we sympathise with Capitol Police officers who were hurt on January 6. But when they took their jobs, was there an expectation that they would never have to deal with a riot?

It’s a measure of the distance between rhetoric and reality that, though the media incessantly dwells on the “deadly” nature of the riot, Thursday’s hearing made no reference to anyone’s death. And for good reason. Though seven people “lost their lives” in connection with January 6, only one was killed. Ashli Babbitt, an unarmed veteran, was shot at point-blank range by Capitol Police officer Michael Byrd, who faced no discipline for his action, and who has since been praised as a hero and lifesaver.

For months after the event, the media and the political establishment insisted that another officer, Brian Sicknick, had been beaten to death with a fire extinguisher by rioters, but this bogus martyrdom was exposed as a lie by the Washington D.C. Chief Medical Examiner, who found that Sicknick died of natural causes.

Ultimately, the events last night amounted to a damp squib. The chain of claims that supposedly link Donald Trump to the actions of moronic hooligans is tendentious. The case is based on assertions that Trump told “lies” about matters of opinion, and that he did not listen to the advice of some of his aides. Trump called for a rally which turned into a riot; therefore, Trump caused a riot. Some of the mob imagined that they could prevent the transfer of power; therefore, the whole thing was an attempted coup.

Read more:

https://unherd.com/thepost/democrat-hysteria-undermines-jan-6-hearing/
Post Comment

New drug cures cancer for 100% of patients in trial

Doctors have successfully cured rectal cancer in patients thanks to an experimental drug trial.

Oncologists at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) in New York found that the latest tests of patients showed no evidence of cancer.

The treatment uses immunotherapy which harnesses the body’s own immune system as an ally against cancer.

Sascha Roth, the first patient in the clinical trial involving immunotherapy had undergone six months of treatment.

For the first time, the MSK clinical trial was investigating if immunotherapy alone could beat rectal cancer that had not spread to other tissues, in a subset of patients whose tumour contained a specific genetic mutation.

As the first patient to enroll in the trial, the research team was anxious that Roth’s experience might prove to be an outlier but the same remarkable result was repeated in all 14 people in the trial.

In every case, the rectal cancer disappeared after immunotherapy — without the need for the standard treatments of radiation, surgery, or chemotherapy — and cancer has not returned in any of the patients, who have been cancer-free for up to two years.

‘It’s incredibly rewarding to get these happy tears and happy emails from the patients in this study who finish treatment and realize, “Oh my God, I get to keep all my normal body functions that I feared I might lose to radiation or surgery,”‘ said Dr. Andrea Cercek, a medical oncologist working on the trial.

The patients in the study had tumours with a specific genetic makeup known as mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) or microsatellite instability (MSI).

There are 45,000 Americans diagnosed a year with rectal cancer. Between 5% and 10% of all rectal cancer patients are thought to have MMRd tumours.

‘Immunotherapy has proven successful in treating a subset of patients with colon and rectal cancer that has metastasized, meaning spread to other tissues,’ explained Dr Luis Diaz, Jr., a co-investigator on the trial.

The clinical trial also focused on avoiding the toxicity often associated with treatment for rectal cancer as the standard treatment for rectal cancer with surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy can be particularly hard on people because of the location of the tumour.

‘They can suffer life-altering bowel and bladder dysfunction, incontinence, infertility, s*xual dysfunction, and more,’ said Dr Diaz.

Read more:

https://metro.co.uk/2022/06/07/new-drug-trial-successfully-cures-100-of-rectal-cancer-16783051/
Post Comment

LA mom mowed down by teen driver blasts DA Gascon over soft sentence

A furious Los Angeles mom who was mowed down with her baby by a hit-and-run teen driver has lashed out at soft-on-crime District Attorney George Gascon after the perp was given just five months probation.

The mother, only identified as Rachel, took aim at LA’s top prosecutor in a scathing victim impact statement after the 16-year-old driver was ordered to participate in a diversionary program over the August 2021 incident, Fox News reported Friday.

“George Gascon doesn’t value my life or the life of my child, or any other victim out there, and would rather reward the monsters like [the juvenile suspect] by demonstrating to them that their actions have no consequences,” Rachel wrote.

“DA Gascon is telling him and every other thug in LA County that it doesn’t matter if you try to murder people. Why are Gascon’s policies prioritizing the livelihood of rotten monsters when my child, my baby, who is incapable of protecting himself, is left to fend for himself, and is essentially being told his life doesn’t matter?”

Shocking surveillance video of the incident showed the teen plowing directly into Rachel as she pushed her 8-month-old son in his stroller down a Venice street the morning of August 6.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-NciEH-kAtI


https://nypost.com/2022/06/03/la-mom-mowed-down-by-teen-driver-blasts-da-over-probation-sentence/
Post Comment

Biden Is Just a ‘Front Man’ Who Carries Out Obama’s Wishes

Near the end of Barack Obama’s tenure in the White House, he openly fantasized during an interview about an unconstitutional and illegal way of effectively remaining in office for a third term through “an an arrangement where I had a stand-in or front-man or front-woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of deliver the lines.”

Obama said, “I used to say if I can make an arrangement where I had a stand-in or front-man or front-woman and they had an earpiece in and I was just in my basement in my sweats looking through the stuff and I could sort of deliver the lines while someone was doing all the talking and ceremony, I’d be fine with that because I found the work fascinating.”

Former Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard argues this exact scenario is playing out right before our eyes between Obama and his former vice president and now president, Joe Biden.

Just days before the Biden administration announced the creation of a “Disinformation Governance Board,” Obama called for increased oversight of misinformation across Big Tech media platforms while speaking at the Stanford Cyber Policy Center.

“Biden is just a front man,” Gabbard said. “Obama, April 21: social media censors ‘don’t go far enough,’ so the government needs to step in to do the job. Six days later, Homeland Security rolls out the ‘Ministry of Truth’ (aka Disinformation Governance Board).” Take a look:

https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1520713806086696960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1520713806086696960%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicksonright.com%2Fblog%2F2022%2F05%2F03%2Ftulsi-gabbard-shares-proof-that-biden-is-just-a-front-man-who-carries-out-obamas-wishes%2F


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/just-a-front-man-tulsi-gabbard-says-biden-carries-out-obamas-wishes
Post Comment

Nancy Pelosi's husband arrested

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, was arrested Saturday night and charged with driving under the influence, according to media news outlet TMZ.

Paul Pelosi, 82, was arrested just before midnight. His blood alcohol content was registered at 0.08 or higher. His bail was set for $5,000 for the two misdemeanors.

The pair have been married since 1963.

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/pelosi-dui-napa/2022/05/29/id/1072018/?fbclid=IwAR2mah7inXIXEdMAsBAy3mHMDvE7CEnIrORssxwVI18pXdekmovV-cbiwMQ
Post Comment

Chief

San Francisco schools ban 'chief' from occupational titles after Native American concerns

SAN FRANCISCO — The San Francisco Unified School District will no longer use the word “chief” in job titles because of concerns from Native Americans.

District officials said they haven't decided what they will use instead of “chief.” The San Francisco Chronicle first reported the ban on Wednesday.

“While there are many opinions on the matter, our leadership team agreed that, given that Native American members of our community have expressed concerns over the use of the title, we are no longer going to use it,” the district statement said.

“With nearly 10,000 employees, SFUSD is one of the largest employers in San Francisco and in addition to site leaders, we need central leaders who serve all of our 119 schools,” it said.

Native American mascots: Maine remains only state to fully ban Native American mascots. Why haven't others followed?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/education/2022/05/27/san-francisco-school-district-bans-chief-titles/9959030002/


How stupid they are in San Francisco.

History and Etymology for chief
Noun and Adjective

Middle English, from Anglo-French chief, chef head, chief, from Latin caput head — more at HEAD

First Known Use of chief
Adjective

14th century, in the meaning defined at sense 1

Adverb

14th century, in the meaning defined above

Noun

15th century, in the meaning defined at sense 1

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/chief
Post Comment

Russia turns on Putin

Politicians demand ‘immediate withdrawal’ from Ukraine as 100 servicemen are fired for refusing to take part in the invasion

A veteran Russian legislator has issued an appeal to Vladimir Putin to stop military action, bring his troops home and end the war in Ukraine.

Communist deputy Leonid Vasyukevich, 69, blasted the use of Moscow’s servicemen in Ukraine, as a Russian court dismissed more than 100 national guardsmen in the first case of soldiers refusing to fight in Ukraine as politicians demanded the army return home.

Members of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, a separate military branch from the Russian army refused to carry out an assignment related to Moscow's 'special operation' in Ukraine.

A military court in Russia's southern republic of Kabardino-Balkaria found that the defendants 'arbitrarily refused to perform an official assignment' and turned down their appeal.

The hearing was held behind closed doors to avoid revealing 'military secrets,' according to the Moscow Times.


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10860995/Russia-turns-Putin-Politicians-demand-immediate-withdrawal-Ukraine.html
Post Comment

Collusion illusion delusion - What it means that Hillary Clinton did it

The Wall Street Journal ran a scathing editorial on May 20, called "Hillary Clinton Did It".

This editorial began: "The Russia-Trump collusion narrative of 2016 was a dirty trick for the ages -- and now we know it came from the top -- candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton." The editorial quickly explained: "That was the testimony Friday by 2016 Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook in federal court [in Washington, D.C.] , and while this news is hardly a surprise, it;s still bracing to find her fingertips on the political weapon." (Also not surprisingly, The May 20 print edition of The New York Times did not include a story on Mook's testimony.)

Mook's testimony was heard at the trial of attorney Michael Sussman, charged with lying to the FBI in calling to their attention a story that Donald J. Trump, by means of connections with Russia's Alfa Bank, was colluding with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The lie at issue was not the false claim about a Trump-Alfa connection, but the charge that Sussman brought this matter to the FBI as a good citizen, and not as a representative of the Clinton campaign.

As the Journal editorial noted: "Prosecutors say was working for the Clinton campaign." The editorial pointed out, "Mr. Mook said Mrs. Clinton was asked about the plan [to call attention to the Trump-Alfa ties] and approved it. A story on the Trump-Alfa Bank allegations thus appeared in Slate, a left-leaning online publication."

After that, the Journal explained how the Clinton campaign used the self-generated news of the investigation and the initial Slate article that came of it, both of which they had planted, as the basis for making tweet after tweet to the press about the Slate report to churn up mass coverage about it in the press and convince the public that the investigation was about something serious.

The concluding paragraphs of the editorial are worth quoting in full:

In short, the Clinton campaign created the Trump-Alfa allegation, fed it to a credulous press that failed to confirm the allegations but ran with them anyway, then promoted the story as if it was legitimate news. The campaign also delivered the claims to the FBI, giving journalists another excuse to portray the accusations as serious and perhaps true.

Most of the press will ignore this news, but the Russia-Trump narrative that Mrs. Clinton sanctioned did enormous harm to the country. It disgraced the FBI, humiliated the press, and sent the country on a three-year investigation to nowhere. Vladimir Putin never came close to doing as much disinformation damage.


The harm done to the United States by the perfidy of the Clintonistas cannot be overemphasized. That "three-year investigation to nowhere" represented the Clinton-Obama attempted takeover of the government. (Call it the COAT campaign.) With congressional Republicans unwilling to prevent the COAT campaign, the Trump administration was blocked from putting U.S.-Russia relations on a rational, mutually beneficial footing, to the point that, under the present Senate leadership, the specter of war with Russia is no longer an unthinkable thought. The COAT campaign succeeded in keeping the Ukraine pot boiling, with the water first heated by Obama's stirring up of anti-Russian feeling in Ukraine, leading to the Maidan revolution that ousted the legitimately elected president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych.

A political opposition ready to lie about Donald J. Trump, supported by a media prepared to believe the worst about Mr. Trump has given us the current reality where the deep state is using NATO as an instrument to humiliate Russia, and Republican leaders in Congress are going along with the plans of the deep state to make the globe an unsafe place except for the globalist hegemony.

Read more:
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/05/what_it_means_that_hillary_clinton_did_it.html
Post Comment

This is a list of Willy3411's Blogs. Click here for Willy3411's Blog List

back to top

About

Support

Follow Us

©Copyright 2001-2024 ConnectingSingles.com, All Rights Reserved

ConnectingSingles® is a registered trademark of Connecting Singles, Inc.

Back to Top
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here