Kyle Rittenhouse NOT GUILTY
A breakdown of the Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty verdict
Count 1: First Degree Reckless Homicide - Not Guilty
Count 2: First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety - Not Guilty
Count 3: First Degree Recklessly Endangering Safety - Not Guilty
Count 4: First Degree Intentional Homicide - Not Guilty
Count 5: Attempted First Degree Intentional Homicide - Not Guilty
Comments (127)
Loved Sons of the Pioneers, Tex Ritter, Tiompkin, Frankie Lane, etc..
This is Well Done & avoids profanity - I'm guessing it'll be played on AM Radio ...
Search: YouTube Kyle Rittenhouse Song ... Take your Pick.
Unclear at this time if it was related to the Rittenhouse Verdict ...
I can imagine No action that could result in More Negative PR.
Possibly more fatalities than the Las Vegas Msss Shooting ...
Eyewitness claims driver was "a black guy with dreadlocks"
A woman wrote Heavy, “A relative lives in Waukesha, a black guy with dreads knocked on her door shortly after the incident at the parade. She wouldn’t let him in and he proceeded to go across the street trying to break into a building. My daughter called 911 with a description and they said they think he was driving the SUV that drove into all the people.” Police have not confirmed the suspect description, but they did describe the suspect as possibly being a “black male” on the scanner.
That's okay. Once you Leftists get in a rut, a crowbar and a towtruck won't get you out.
Yes, absolutely.
"if Trump was black the wall would have been finished long time ago"
ehhmmm....
well maybe it would...
lol
Brief clip of Kyle speaking with Tucker Carlson ...
It doesn't even look like the Same Person!!
'Til Not I posting it in bits & pieces ...
Yes, I think I know myself.
I would not be an ideal defendant.
For one thing, these street vermin are the Domestic Enemy. They've declared it themselves and they've declared open warfare against the US Constitution. Anyone who has served has sworn an oath to Defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Secondly, what is Marine Corps doctrine?
The mission of the Marine Corps rifle squad is to locate, close with and destroy the enemy by fire and maneuver or to repel the enemy's assault by fire and close combat.
That's pretty straightforward.
If I placed myself in the middle of a situation like Kyles' it would not go well. Not for me, and not for the street vermin. I have no faith in the American justice system. Any justice to be had would have to be dealt out then and there.
So, I don't go looking for such a confrontation. I don't look forward to the prospect of it being forced upon me.
I seem to recall John Wayne saying this at one point, or at least, it seems like something he would say in anger:
Neighbor, I ain't looking for a fight, but if you insist, I'll oblige ya!
You are so right.
Yet again.
But I sincerely hope he has learned his lesson to not be where he isn't needed and indeed underage with a fully loaded gun that he wasn't old enough to have in his possession.
No. The lesson from this exercise should be learned by BLM/Antifa...
"Don't bring your mess around here. It might well be your last stop."
Every gun lovin' loon in the country will take encouragement from this, that is the danger.
Kyle's actions & subsequent Acquittal Will inspire others to protect Lives & Property.
BLM & Antifa will No Longer Burn & Loot while Law Enforcement stands down.
Kyle Wannabes gettin' ready for "Next Time" -
The Rittenhouse Verdict will sell more AR Style Rifles than a US Army Purchase.
Not a Shred of doubt about it.
If that's what happens then that's exactly what I'd call it. I hope the police deal with it with the full force of the law. I'm not soft on law and order, despite what some of your fellow countrymen say.
Do try to read with more care.
Way to self goal an argument. Evidently you are too Dunning-Kruger to see what everyone else sees:
- yes, "peaceably to assemble" is an enumerated Constitutional right.
- no, neither BLM nor Antifa were peaceable.
- yes, it was the sworn duty of government and police to keep the peace.
- no, they stood down and let the street vermin burn, loot, smash and assault.
- yes, the Second Amendment is there for just such occasions.
Well why isn't there more focus on why the police stood down? that should be the issue of debate. If it was a dereliction of duty it shouldn't be allowed to happen again.
That's treason: lending aid and comfort to the domestic enemy in a time when that domestic enemy has declared war against the u.s. constitution.
Maybe he needs to turn that Computer back to his elder Sister!
chaos. Stand tighter together and train on coordination, like a riot police.
Then there will be less chance of being overrun.