Medications good for so many different cures.

I was given a prescription last week and I was rather taken aback by the warning label which indicated: Not recomended for Women and Children.

So I decided to go on the internet and read up on the drug before I decided if the pharmacist or Doctor had made an error and had given me a wrong prescription.

The medication given was FLOMAX, and reading it on the internet it stated it was for Enlarged Prostate. I thought, well thats odd, women don't have prostates for 1 thing and the next thing is that I went in for Kidney Stones. And further more it still stated not Recomended for Women and Children.

Upon further reading it did say it is also given to paitents with kidney stones, but I still had to find out if it was given in error, because if it's not recomended for women, what harm could it do to the female body?

Well I called the pharmicist, who told me that yes it is given to women and men for Kidney Stones, and their are no side effects that can harm a women.

applause I was happy, but I think the drug company should update their lists so as not to scare someone.
Post Comment

Comments (11)

professoroh uh,,you better consult other doc.for that madam,,i was laughing while i was reading it,but remember,health is wealth mam,another option from other doc.wont hurt you,,good health mam,take care comfort handshake bouquet
Thanks Jedda12. I have no insurance, going to county hospital, so not much selection when comes to medical professionals. This was given to me by an ER DR.

You be safe and well to. Thanks for your advice.peace
G'day Angel. Sounds like it's one of those drugs that can be prescribed for off-label use. Maybe some doctors prescribe it and others don't.dunno

I'd be quiet happy to believe the pharmacist though. Just hope it works for ya.cheers
Thanks Billy, I want to believe the pharmacist as well as the Doc's. After all thats what they they are trained in, giving out the best in medical advice.

If in 3 months my condition doesn't clear my doc is going to send me to a urologist to see if their is a connecting problem and issue.
comfort angeleyes dear,i wish you all the good health and happiness in life,goodluck and god bless alwaysbouquet hug
You are supposed to have blind faith in your doctor ..... He is to be worshipped as the Holy Man who Knows Everything..... And the drugs he issues is part of his retirement package, holiday house, new auto, gold plated golf-clubs.

I once asked a pharmacist how come he and his family looked so healthy? His reply was "Oh, I KNOW what is in those drugs - we dont take them ... we stick to natural cures"...... hahahaaaa .... "For every pill that cures something .. there is a side-effect" were also his words.

Strange how .. if you dont ever visit a doctor, you never get seriously ill. But once you start .... you go on and on and on ....
It's wise not to go to a doctor. And not take his pills. You'll avoid the side effects. And you will very cleverly avoid getting sick from going to the doctors.

However, when I get sick, I go to a doctor. I don't believe that going to a doctor causes illness. If someone says that those who go to doctors will go back again and again BECAUSE they went to the doctor the first time, are very right. But the people who say this, while being right, forgot to think of one important link in the chain of causation, which is that the people who go to doctors go there because they are sick, and not because they want to get sick.

Those who need treatment for a disease that has no cure but can be treated, yes, those people will keep on going back to the doctor.

Those people whose illnesses can be cured, will go to the doctor and then not keep returning to the doctor.

The gold-plated sthetoscopes have nothing to do with what drug cures a disease or mitigates pain and suffering. It has to do with the system in a society how wealth gets distributed among its individuals. This is a political-economic issue, not at all a medical issue. I would never be bitter at someone else making a lot of money, because I would do it too if I could. Blaming a person for legally and lawfully making a bundle, is not that person's personal fault or weakness of character.
Billy, the OP believed her pharmacist and her doctor. She believed the pill will cure her, and that's why she read the label.

At that point she noticed a huge discrepancy in advice. I think the OP did the right thing in probing the issue, since three people she trusts and believes are expert authorities, gave her two opposing and contradictory instructions. These were: 1. Take these pills for your ills, and 2. Don't take these pills, because they are not recommended for women (and the OP already had the knowledge that she was a woman.)

She knew someone made a mistake, since at the same time and at the same respect a pill cannot be both recommended and not recommended.

So she probed, and she found out that the label was wrong.

Which was one of the authorities she had had trust in.

She now knows she can't trust all labels.

And this hurts, it would hurt me too, to learn that a trusted authority can't be trusted any more.

The OP pleads that the labels be more accurate. This is her way of putting an effort to get her to trust the world again.

She is trying to change the world so that she will be able to trust authorities without question.

A betrayal can do funny things to people, and the first thing it does to them is makes them feel hurt and pain.

There was a pretty lengthy discussion on that matter in another post somewhere else on the public forums or blogs on this site, in which I participated and was declared a heretic and a person to be hated by all other participants.
^^ Forgot to add, I was turned into an object of hatred, because of my stated reasons how I got betrayed and how I did not like that feeling, and how now I keep a watchful eye out for the particular way of betrayal that was hurtful to me, and was done in the same way by the members of a particular and well-definable sub-set of society.
I know what ya saying Tara. I've had issues with quacks previously, that left me feeling as though I was some kind of human guinea pig.

Angel's doctor should have at least pointed out to her what the drug was primarily intended for. Then set her mind at ease by explaining the possible side effects and so on.

I think doctors now use the same method of prescribing drugs as Angel did. Google it.

I'd still take the word of the chemist. I've found that they have the ingredient that matters..... they actually care.cheers
Thanks for all your comments. Billy, before the ER Doc released me the nurse came in and told me that he was giving me this drug for Kidney Stones. I just got a little confused and got nervous when I seen what the drug was originally used for, and when it said not recomended for women. But as I said it did say when I googgled the drug it did say it was also given to paitents with Kidney Stones.

I believe that people are slow to updating things in the computer, when I used to work for the airlines Delta was so far behind the times they just caught up just as the office closed. Things change on a regular basis, and things can be easily missed.....
Post Comment - Let others know what you think about this Blog.

About this Blog

by Unknown
created Aug 2010
752 Views
Last Viewed: Apr 18
Last Commented: Aug 2010

Feeling Creative?