Here is a list of Opinionated Blogs ordered by Last Commented, posted by members. A Blog is a journal you may enter about your life, thoughts, interesting experiences, or lessons you've learned. Post an opinion, impart words of wisdom, or talk about something interesting in your day. Update your blog on a regular basis, or just whenever you have something to say. Creating a blog is a good way to share something of yourself with others. Reading blogs is a good way to learn more about others. Click here to post a blog.
hollandjoe968@gmail.com
This is scam, also a female version, for the men:
Hello, I hope this email finds you well. I was online today and about to close my account since I already got a life partner here. That was when my Cousin, "Joe" came across your profile, as he was actually standing behind me. He's been all over me about getting in touch with you. He said you seem like a woman he would like to know better. You don't need to write back here, His direct email is hollandjoe968@gmail.com. I believe you will thank me later for this. My warms regards.
Got 3 messages from him, they are writing 100's !!!
Hello, I hope this email finds you well. I was online today and about to close my account since I already got a life partner here. That was when my Cousin, "Joe" came across your profile, as he was actually standing behind me. He's been all over me about getting in touch with you. He said you seem like a woman he would like to know better. You don't need to write back here, His direct email is hollandjoe968@gmail.com. I believe you will thank me later for this. My warms regards.
Got 3 messages from him, they are writing 100's !!!
online today!
I know Santa Claus exists...
I know Santa Claus exists, but I don't have any proof. Every Christmas they have TV shows about him. All my childhood friends know about Santa and after Christmas they ask their friends: "What did Santa bring you?" No question about this... Santa does exist!
With the exception of a few Jewish kids, ALL OF US WERE TAUGHT THE SAME THING
It's the end of July and he's somewhere in the North Pole with his helpers making toys for kids. I could feel their energy You've got less than 5 months to pull this off guys. Less than 5 months.
Let's not dispute this. After the election, Trump said he won... but he has no proof.
Now, he's got me thinking. I'm pretty sure there's a connection between Santa and Trump, but I don't have any proof.
With the exception of a few Jewish kids, ALL OF US WERE TAUGHT THE SAME THING
It's the end of July and he's somewhere in the North Pole with his helpers making toys for kids. I could feel their energy You've got less than 5 months to pull this off guys. Less than 5 months.
Let's not dispute this. After the election, Trump said he won... but he has no proof.
Now, he's got me thinking. I'm pretty sure there's a connection between Santa and Trump, but I don't have any proof.
The New York Post, Wall Street Journal Get Trump Wrong - Jan. 6 editorials from the Post and WSJ.
he headline on a recent, amazingly wrong New York Post editorial was this:
Trump’s silence on Jan. 6 is damning
Over there at the Post’s sister publication, our friends at the Wall Street Journal, was a similar headline:
The President Who Stood Still on Jan. 6
Even as the riot raged at the Capitol, Trump wouldn’t tell his supporters to stop.
Hello? Say what? Where to begin with a factual correction for both the Post and WSJ? Both of them are personal favorites of mine and daily must-reads.
Let’s start with the White House rally on January 6 which preceded the events at the Capitol. As I have mentioned before, I had a literal front row seat at that rally. I quite distinctly heard President Donald Trump, standing mere yards from me, tell his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol.
When the rally was over, I went not to the Capitol but to my Marriott hotel room to fulfill my television commitments for the rest of the afternoon. The president, obviously against his will, was returned to the White House.
That’s where the WSJ amazingly if unconsciously notes: “At about 1:30 p.m. he went to the dining room…”
The WSJ then notes that the Capitol was breached at “2:13 p.m.” and that:
At 2:38 Mr. Trump tweeted: “Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!”
Which is to say a mere 25 minutes after the Capitol was breached — not 187 minutes, as the January 6 Committee lies — Trump asked his supporters to “stay peaceful” — for the second time — and added a request to:
Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country.
Particularly startling is the WSJ saying Trump sat watching the chaos and was “refusing to send help.” It also says:
Mr. Trump took an oath to defend the Constitution, and he had a duty as Commander in Chief to protect the Capitol from a mob attacking it in his name. He refused. He didn’t call the military to send help.
What?????
Amazingly not noted in either piece is what Trump did in the run-up to January 6, specifically to protect the Capitol and the crowd of protestors.
Here is the headline from ace investigative reporter John Solomon’s Just the News:
Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows
Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration’s account, shows Democrats’ fateful rejections of offers. “Seems absolutely illogical,” one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.
Solomon reports this:
The Pentagon first raised the possibility of sending National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol four days before the Jan. 6 riots, setting in motion a series of rejections by Capitol Police and Democrats that left Congress vulnerable as threats of violence were rising, according to government memos that validate Trump administration officials’ long-held claims.
Over at Townhall, columnist Deroy Murdock asks this:
Likewise, if Donald J. Trump (DJT) wanted his supporters to storm Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021, and disrupt that day’s congressional certification of Electoral College votes, would he — two days earlier (sic) — have approved 10,000 to 20,000 Washington, D.C. National Guard (DCNG) soldiers to stymie his own seditious plans?
Read more:
Trump’s silence on Jan. 6 is damning
Over there at the Post’s sister publication, our friends at the Wall Street Journal, was a similar headline:
The President Who Stood Still on Jan. 6
Even as the riot raged at the Capitol, Trump wouldn’t tell his supporters to stop.
Hello? Say what? Where to begin with a factual correction for both the Post and WSJ? Both of them are personal favorites of mine and daily must-reads.
Let’s start with the White House rally on January 6 which preceded the events at the Capitol. As I have mentioned before, I had a literal front row seat at that rally. I quite distinctly heard President Donald Trump, standing mere yards from me, tell his supporters to march “peacefully and patriotically” to the Capitol.
When the rally was over, I went not to the Capitol but to my Marriott hotel room to fulfill my television commitments for the rest of the afternoon. The president, obviously against his will, was returned to the White House.
That’s where the WSJ amazingly if unconsciously notes: “At about 1:30 p.m. he went to the dining room…”
The WSJ then notes that the Capitol was breached at “2:13 p.m.” and that:
At 2:38 Mr. Trump tweeted: “Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country. Stay peaceful!”
Which is to say a mere 25 minutes after the Capitol was breached — not 187 minutes, as the January 6 Committee lies — Trump asked his supporters to “stay peaceful” — for the second time — and added a request to:
Please support our Capitol Police and Law Enforcement. They are truly on the side of our Country.
Particularly startling is the WSJ saying Trump sat watching the chaos and was “refusing to send help.” It also says:
Mr. Trump took an oath to defend the Constitution, and he had a duty as Commander in Chief to protect the Capitol from a mob attacking it in his name. He refused. He didn’t call the military to send help.
What?????
Amazingly not noted in either piece is what Trump did in the run-up to January 6, specifically to protect the Capitol and the crowd of protestors.
Here is the headline from ace investigative reporter John Solomon’s Just the News:
Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before Jan. 6 riots, memo shows
Official Capitol Police timeline validates Trump administration’s account, shows Democrats’ fateful rejections of offers. “Seems absolutely illogical,” one official wrote about security posture hours before riot began.
Solomon reports this:
The Pentagon first raised the possibility of sending National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol four days before the Jan. 6 riots, setting in motion a series of rejections by Capitol Police and Democrats that left Congress vulnerable as threats of violence were rising, according to government memos that validate Trump administration officials’ long-held claims.
Over at Townhall, columnist Deroy Murdock asks this:
Likewise, if Donald J. Trump (DJT) wanted his supporters to storm Capitol Hill on January 6, 2021, and disrupt that day’s congressional certification of Electoral College votes, would he — two days earlier (sic) — have approved 10,000 to 20,000 Washington, D.C. National Guard (DCNG) soldiers to stymie his own seditious plans?
Read more:
Biden Regime Plans to Give ID Cards to the Millions of Illegals Who Invaded the US Under Their Watch
The lawless Biden regime is planning to hand out ID cards to illegal aliens who invaded the country so that it is easier for them to to access housing, healthcare, transportation and other benefits.
The cards will essentially make illegal immigration legal in America. It would allow the illegal aliens to show police that they are already in the system.
This would assure their permanent stay in the country.
And since most migrants toss their IDs in a ditch before they cross into the US, US authorities would have to trust the illegals to provide the details on their identity. What could go wrong?
This is the latest plan by Joe Biden and his handlers to destroy the country and encourage millions of aliens to continue to invade the US.
Read more:
January 6th Hearings Have Backfired On Joe Biden And The Democrats
Democrats bet big on the January 6th hearings and things aren’t working out as planned.
The ratings for the hearings are terrible even though they’re airing them at prime time, and most Americans seem to have just moved on.
The ratings for the hearings are terrible even though they’re airing them at prime time, and most Americans seem to have just moved on.
Trump Allies Plan To Go Nuclear On The Swamp If He’s Re-elected
Former President Donald Trump and his allies are planning a second attempt to “drain the swamp,” should he run and win in 2024, according to a new report.
Conservative allies plan to staff his administration with young professionals who agree with the former president’s agenda by reimplementing Schedule F, a Trump-era executive order, Axios reported Friday.
Trump created Schedule F in 2020. The executive order formed a category of federal employees who are in, “Positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.” Under the executive order, the employees who fill these positions are subject to change during a presidential transition.
“The Federal Government benefits from career professionals in positions that are not normally subject to change as a result of a Presidential transition,” the executive order read.
The Schedule F category could apply to as many as 50,000 federal employees, allowing Trump to fire thousands of federal workers effective immediately. The tactic could extend to employees at the FBI, the State Department, and the Pentagon, Axios reported.
Trump’s staffers were hardly all in on the president’s goals during his administration. Trump’s famously strained relationship with former National Security Adviser John Bolton culminated in Trump firing him. Trump later told the Daily Caller that Bolton was a “dumb maniac who wants to go to war with any anybody that can breathe.” In 2019, Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci called Trump an “orange cancer.”
As Trump continues to drop hints about a potential run for president, Conservatives are creating a “new inner circle,” in an effort to avoid the staff revolts of the Trump administration. Schedule F may provide them with the necessary space to fill with ideologically aligned staffers.
“We are consciously bringing on the toughest and most courageous fighters with the know-how and credibility to crush the deep state,” Russ Vought, President of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), told Axios. CRA’s mission is to, “renew a consensus of America as a nation under God with unique interests worthy of defending.”
Former Trump senior advisor Stephen Miller started America First Legal in 2021, an organization that legally challenges many of President Biden’s policies. Now, the organization is also assembling a group of lawyers who could fill general counsel jobs in a potential future Trump White House.
American Moment, an organization dedicated to recruiting and training potential staffers in all levels of government, reports 700 “fully vetted” young people to do just that.
“Everyone in the federal government wants to act like they’re working in policy,” Saurabh Sharma, president of American Moment, told the Daily Caller, “But if you’re doing policy you’re immediately hirable and fireable at will.”
“It’s going to take principled and effective leadership at the top of the presidential personnel office to import Schedule F and make sure that the next conservative President can fill the administration with people they need,” Sharma said.
Sources tell Axios that a future Trump administration may need as many as 10,000 vetted personnel to fill jobs in the administration.
Conservative allies plan to staff his administration with young professionals who agree with the former president’s agenda by reimplementing Schedule F, a Trump-era executive order, Axios reported Friday.
Trump created Schedule F in 2020. The executive order formed a category of federal employees who are in, “Positions of a confidential, policy-determining, policy-making, or policy-advocating character.” Under the executive order, the employees who fill these positions are subject to change during a presidential transition.
“The Federal Government benefits from career professionals in positions that are not normally subject to change as a result of a Presidential transition,” the executive order read.
The Schedule F category could apply to as many as 50,000 federal employees, allowing Trump to fire thousands of federal workers effective immediately. The tactic could extend to employees at the FBI, the State Department, and the Pentagon, Axios reported.
Trump’s staffers were hardly all in on the president’s goals during his administration. Trump’s famously strained relationship with former National Security Adviser John Bolton culminated in Trump firing him. Trump later told the Daily Caller that Bolton was a “dumb maniac who wants to go to war with any anybody that can breathe.” In 2019, Former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci called Trump an “orange cancer.”
As Trump continues to drop hints about a potential run for president, Conservatives are creating a “new inner circle,” in an effort to avoid the staff revolts of the Trump administration. Schedule F may provide them with the necessary space to fill with ideologically aligned staffers.
“We are consciously bringing on the toughest and most courageous fighters with the know-how and credibility to crush the deep state,” Russ Vought, President of the Center for Renewing America (CRA), told Axios. CRA’s mission is to, “renew a consensus of America as a nation under God with unique interests worthy of defending.”
Former Trump senior advisor Stephen Miller started America First Legal in 2021, an organization that legally challenges many of President Biden’s policies. Now, the organization is also assembling a group of lawyers who could fill general counsel jobs in a potential future Trump White House.
American Moment, an organization dedicated to recruiting and training potential staffers in all levels of government, reports 700 “fully vetted” young people to do just that.
“Everyone in the federal government wants to act like they’re working in policy,” Saurabh Sharma, president of American Moment, told the Daily Caller, “But if you’re doing policy you’re immediately hirable and fireable at will.”
“It’s going to take principled and effective leadership at the top of the presidential personnel office to import Schedule F and make sure that the next conservative President can fill the administration with people they need,” Sharma said.
Sources tell Axios that a future Trump administration may need as many as 10,000 vetted personnel to fill jobs in the administration.
HOV Lanes in the USA
Here in America on our Interstate highways wh have HOV lanes which allow vehicles with 2 or more passengers only. I noticed this story today.
Pregnant mother in Texas sparks legal debate in claiming unborn child should allow HOV travel in post-Roe era
Brandy Bottone was 34 weeks pregnant at the time she was pulled over on June 29.
A pregnant mother from Plano, Texas is looking to contest a traffic citation she received for driving in a high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, as she claims her unborn child should count as a second passenger.
On June 29, officers pulled over Brandy Bottone, who was 34 weeks pregnant at the time, as they suspected her of being the only person in the vehicle that was driving in the HOV lane, FOX 4 of Dallas reported.
She claimed, however, that her unborn child is a legal person, following a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade.
"He starts peeking around. He's like, 'Is it just you?' And I said, 'No there's two of us?'" Bottone told the Dallas Morning News.
"My baby girl is right here. She is a person," she told the officer, pointing to her stomach. Bottone was initially in the HOV lane as she was hurrying to pick up her 1-year-old son.
Bottone also cited the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and claimed her unborn child was a separate, unique individual in the car, FOX 4 reported.
"And then I said, 'Well (I'm) not trying to throw a political mix here, but with everything going on (with Roe v. Wade), this counts as a baby,’" Bottone said, per the Dallas Morning News.
Read more:
What say you ???
Pregnant mother in Texas sparks legal debate in claiming unborn child should allow HOV travel in post-Roe era
Brandy Bottone was 34 weeks pregnant at the time she was pulled over on June 29.
A pregnant mother from Plano, Texas is looking to contest a traffic citation she received for driving in a high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane, as she claims her unborn child should count as a second passenger.
On June 29, officers pulled over Brandy Bottone, who was 34 weeks pregnant at the time, as they suspected her of being the only person in the vehicle that was driving in the HOV lane, FOX 4 of Dallas reported.
She claimed, however, that her unborn child is a legal person, following a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court overturning of Roe v. Wade.
"He starts peeking around. He's like, 'Is it just you?' And I said, 'No there's two of us?'" Bottone told the Dallas Morning News.
"My baby girl is right here. She is a person," she told the officer, pointing to her stomach. Bottone was initially in the HOV lane as she was hurrying to pick up her 1-year-old son.
Bottone also cited the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and claimed her unborn child was a separate, unique individual in the car, FOX 4 reported.
"And then I said, 'Well (I'm) not trying to throw a political mix here, but with everything going on (with Roe v. Wade), this counts as a baby,’" Bottone said, per the Dallas Morning News.
Read more:
What say you ???
The EU just told the truth about Putin, this is scary | Redacted
Natali and Clayton Morris
A Blog is a journal you may enter about your life, your thoughts, interesting experiences, or lessons you have learned. It's your own page on Connecting Singles that you can update on a regular basis, or just whenever you have something to say. You can write about an opinion, impart words of wisdom, or talk about something interesting in your day. Creating a blog is a good way to share something of yourself with Connecting Singles members. Reading blogs is a good way to learn more about members you have met here. Please be sure to read the blog rules before posting.
Would YOU like to post a blog on Connecting Singles? Have you written blogs that you'd like to share with other members? Posting your blogs shows your skill and creativity and helps members get to know you better. Your blog will appear on the Connecting Singles Blogs page and also in a link on your profile page. Click here to post a blog »