Who is dating who here in CS? (948)
Laura25: Many in fact did, Sommer. It even caused some people to leave CS.
Would you argue the fact that over 50% of so-called "dating couples" listed here have never even met each other. Some others are listed without their consent to mention their names.
Would you argue the fact that over 50% of so-called "dating couples" listed here have never even met each other. Some others are listed without their consent to mention their names.
See, if a couple want to announce they are a couple and declare that they are in public, who am I to denounce that they aren't?
I am not aware of those who have left Laura. I know the people who have declared some form of commitment in public.
I wish the people who do declare some form of commitment the best. I do not judge them because they have not met.
Luckily for me, I had a beautiful amount of support in my union, for me I can happily say I am pleased that people are aware that I am in a relationship. I can look at him on the pillow next to me.
Looking at the list, then I know the people that I know, it is not my place to question those that have not met.
As for those that have left, then I am not aware.
------ This thread is Archived ------
mylifewithu: Oh so you found yourself not to be easy. When I turn myself down, I just give myself a little space from me. And that usually makes her come running back to me. Especially after myself has had a drink or two.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Laura25: Don't get upset over this nonsense, Symbolistartist.
We had all kind of moronic lists around here - some were a good fun, some weren't. I guess this one turned out to be the latter.
You don't think it in fact reflects dating couples, do you?
'Cause it does not.
We had all kind of moronic lists around here - some were a good fun, some weren't. I guess this one turned out to be the latter.
You don't think it in fact reflects dating couples, do you?
'Cause it does not.
It reflects married couples, dating couples, engaged couples, online hopeful couples who haven't met yet, and a couple of obvious funny ones.
And yes, it can be adjusted and corrected as necessary, but it's nice to see a list of successes here.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sommerauer71: See, if a couple want to announce they are a couple and declare that they are in public, who am I to denounce that they aren't?
I am not aware of those who have left Laura. I know the people who have declared some form of commitment in public.
I wish the people who do declare some form of commitment the best. I do not judge them because they have not met.
Luckily for me, I had a beautiful amount of support in my union, for me I can happily say I am pleased that people are aware that I am in a relationship. I can look at him on the pillow next to me.
Looking at the list, then I know the people that I know, it is not my place to question those that have not met.
As for those that have left, then I am not aware.
I am not aware of those who have left Laura. I know the people who have declared some form of commitment in public.
I wish the people who do declare some form of commitment the best. I do not judge them because they have not met.
Luckily for me, I had a beautiful amount of support in my union, for me I can happily say I am pleased that people are aware that I am in a relationship. I can look at him on the pillow next to me.
Looking at the list, then I know the people that I know, it is not my place to question those that have not met.
As for those that have left, then I am not aware.
Very surprised by your post, Sommer.
You sound as if you didn't read this thread and didn't see how many people are protested against throwing their names around, how many people got upset and frustrated. And YES, to the point of leaving CS because they could not bring their point across - it's not an easy task, I have to admit, to to make a point here, where virtual couples are not being questioned by anybody, EVEN after people practically beg to leave them out of it.
------ This thread is Archived ------
g33kgurl: hiya symbolistartist.. sorry about that - i point the finger of blame towards bodleing (page 13 of this thread) for that..
thanks for updating the list shirley49WV!!
ambrose & GG
lifesajoy & hedistuff
keytone & kamelia
jpunk & harmonywell
zee & laura
Pat & Paki princess (I forgot her user name)
shedman & mercedes
merky & slim
spicey1 & nfowler
mf & mickey
sommer & PPV
joanne (kissmedeeply) & eric
don (the kansan) & jackie(jackson)
peaches & ray
ooby & jan
waiting4U & galacticbodhi
lillylady & miked56y
Hotrodlarry & "Account Cancelled"
jlb684 & "Account Cancelled"
Lela & Lela
buddyray & krisha
chriss & knowswhentofoldhopefully this is now accurate. everyone is welcome to revise/delete/add.
thanks for updating the list shirley49WV!!
ambrose & GG
lifesajoy & hedistuff
keytone & kamelia
jpunk & harmonywell
zee & laura
Pat & Paki princess (I forgot her user name)
shedman & mercedes
merky & slim
spicey1 & nfowler
mf & mickey
sommer & PPV
joanne (kissmedeeply) & eric
don (the kansan) & jackie(jackson)
peaches & ray
ooby & jan
waiting4U & galacticbodhi
lillylady & miked56y
Hotrodlarry & "Account Cancelled"
jlb684 & "Account Cancelled"
Lela & Lela
buddyray & krisha
chriss & knowswhentofoldhopefully this is now accurate. everyone is welcome to revise/delete/add.
Dont blame me...I just made an observation.
I'm not the one making up lists here.
------ This thread is Archived ------
druidess6308: It reflects married couples, dating couples, engaged couples, online hopeful couples who haven't met yet, and a couple of obvious funny ones.
And yes, it can be adjusted and corrected as necessary, but it's nice to see a list of successes here.
And yes, it can be adjusted and corrected as necessary, but it's nice to see a list of successes here.
List of successes - yes.
Can't agree MORE with that Dru.
Given it's posted by both people involved in this success, hopefully not virtual success. But any would do if both agreed to be posted on a list.
It's a dating site FFS. Why we feel free to do it to ppl {listing them, page after page} while they beg us to stop?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Laura25: Very surprised by your post, Sommer.
You sound as if you didn't read this thread and didn't see how many people are protested against throwing their names around, how many people got upset and frustrated. And YES, to the point of leaving CS because they could not bring their point across - it's not an easy task, I have to admit, to to make a point here, where virtual couples are not being questioned by anybody, EVEN after people practically beg to leave them out of it.
You sound as if you didn't read this thread and didn't see how many people are protested against throwing their names around, how many people got upset and frustrated. And YES, to the point of leaving CS because they could not bring their point across - it's not an easy task, I have to admit, to to make a point here, where virtual couples are not being questioned by anybody, EVEN after people practically beg to leave them out of it.
Oh I have the read the thread Laura. You know me well enough to know that I will do that.
I will say this.
I don't enjoy rankings or lists. The minute they are started some people here will be upset. I am against names being thrown around for any purpose. I think you will see my comments throughout the thread.
However, to catergorise I will state that some people who are together who don't mind should be allowed to say that they don't mind.
Those that have been named as a couple and are not true then they too can state.
I was on a list for some weeks. Not a very pleasant list.
I know of my close friends who have not met in the flesh so to speak.
Lista are lists, some of them will be correct, some of them will not be. To name because of some forum communication is wrong, to name those that are well known as couples is something that they are proud of. Lists will never please everybody.
I am indifferent to this one, as if you have read the thread, I have corrected the ones I do know are not true.
I can see your point, but to say it is not a true reflection of all is my argument. Because that is not true at all.
I am being three dimensional here instead of looking at one side.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sommerauer71: Oh I have the read the thread Laura. You know me well enough to know that I will do that.
I will say this.
I don't enjoy rankings or lists. The minute they are started some people here will be upset. I am against names being thrown around for any purpose. I think you will see my comments throughout the thread.
However, to catergorise I will state that some people who are together who don't mind should be allowed to say that they don't mind.
Those that have been named as a couple and are not true then they too can state.
I was on a list for some weeks. Not a very pleasant list.
I know of my close friends who have not met in the flesh so to speak.
Lista are lists, some of them will be correct, some of them will not be. To name because of some forum communication is wrong, to name those that are well known as couples is something that they are proud of. Lists will never please everybody.
I am indifferent to this one, as if you have read the thread, I have corrected the ones I do know are not true.
I can see your point, but to say it is not a true reflection of all is my argument. Because that is not true at all.
I am being three dimensional here instead of looking at one side.
As i said before maybe people should be asked before they go on lists. Unless i have it wrong that is what Laura is sayingI will say this.
I don't enjoy rankings or lists. The minute they are started some people here will be upset. I am against names being thrown around for any purpose. I think you will see my comments throughout the thread.
However, to catergorise I will state that some people who are together who don't mind should be allowed to say that they don't mind.
Those that have been named as a couple and are not true then they too can state.
I was on a list for some weeks. Not a very pleasant list.
I know of my close friends who have not met in the flesh so to speak.
Lista are lists, some of them will be correct, some of them will not be. To name because of some forum communication is wrong, to name those that are well known as couples is something that they are proud of. Lists will never please everybody.
I am indifferent to this one, as if you have read the thread, I have corrected the ones I do know are not true.
I can see your point, but to say it is not a true reflection of all is my argument. Because that is not true at all.
I am being three dimensional here instead of looking at one side.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Here's a suggestion... why don't these couples just name THEMSELVES to the list? 
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
------ This thread is Archived ------
My only point on this is I enjoy knowing 'real' people have been sucessful in finding a mate. Also, if the list are not correct then it is doing the person some harm in that potential 'suitors' will stay away from them.
I truly believe we can post anything that we want. I do not want to limit any person on any subject.
I truly believe we can post anything that we want. I do not want to limit any person on any subject.
------ This thread is Archived ------
sweetowen: Here's a suggestion... why don't these couples just name THEMSELVES to the list?
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
"Now that's an idea."
------ This thread is Archived ------
Polarbutterfly: "Now that's an idea."
------ This thread is Archived ------
"It's simple really,why the big debate
when there's a simple solution..?."
when there's a simple solution..?."
------ This thread is Archived ------
sweetowen: Here's a suggestion... why don't these couples just name THEMSELVES to the list?
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
ive mentioned this 3 times or so in this very thread
i mean its inappropriat
on a few levels but im just a difficult person right?not sweet like you sweet
------ This thread is Archived ------
mindfful: ive mentioned this 3 times or so in this very threadi mean its inappropriat on a few levels but im just a difficult person right?
not sweet like you sweet
not sweet like you sweet
Why you are just like honey on a warm summer day!
------ This thread is Archived ------
morgan5: As i said before maybe people should be asked before they go on lists. Unless i have it wrong that is what Laura is saying
Indeed, Morgan.
I believe I stated that in return to your original post. I don't fancy the job though.
I understand what Laura is saying.
And as I said, I am looking at it in a three dimensional way. Not just black and white.
I would like a person to come in and challenge Kansan and Jackson on that it is not 'a true reflection' of their relationship.
Or Joanne and Eric. Could you blame them for coming in and stating the opposite?
That is my point and if I have not made that clear, then my apologies.
You and Laura are fighting the corner of the ones that are unhappy about it, I don't have to fight the corner of the ones that are in happy relationships.
Certainly not my own either.
------ This thread is Archived ------
sweetowen: Here's a suggestion... why don't these couples just name THEMSELVES to the list?
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
That way, if they don't want to be added to the list, they won't be.
Exactly, it is nobody else's business but their own.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Big_John: Why you are just like honey on a warm summer day!
overpowering and sticky?
i mean am i wrong? i mentioned it...
greetings john
------ This thread is Archived ------
I can see a point in both ways of viewing this.
On one hand, it's no big deal if someone lists couples who have made their happy meeting through this site.
On another hand, it is a bit strange to try and list the status in relationships between people who you have never even met.
But neither is wrong. The weirdo ones are the ones who try and wedge between two people who indeed have met on this site.
That's the creepy sort.
On one hand, it's no big deal if someone lists couples who have made their happy meeting through this site.
On another hand, it is a bit strange to try and list the status in relationships between people who you have never even met.
But neither is wrong. The weirdo ones are the ones who try and wedge between two people who indeed have met on this site.
That's the creepy sort.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
makeover
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
Ladies
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
The weird and the random facts around the world
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Kultur-multur
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
s*xual skills
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Related Forums
- makeover
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- Ladies
- I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- Kultur-multur
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
- s*xual skills
I think I am a "VICTIM", I played absolutely NO ROLL.. WOMEN!!!!! I sent her 73 emails in the past 22 hours and not a single reply.
When I signed on CS I seen an ad for Shaadi.com & a 22 yo, it said propose to her, I did.
SUre hope someone doesn't think I am desperate.
Everyone on CS and other dating sites should try. If we fail, so what! No one should be considered desperate for trying.