How to beat your wife ( Archived) (366)

Did anyone notice the last five seconds of the above clip. "He should not beat her like an animal or a child - slapping them right and left."

So not only do they advocate physical punishment on wives, but also equate the punishment of a child with the punishment of an animal. Why are these people so effing violent.

Which people?

I only saw one person talking in the clip.

The sphere of influence multiculturalism includes;

Every job interview.
Every piece of bureaucracy.
Social housing.
Education.
Benefits.
Media.
Birth rates.
Political correctness.
Social/Community relations.
Cultural "awareness" doctrines.
Consumer rights.

I'm sure I could go on.

They'e only just catching up here in Spain ... Only in the last couple of years have the laws been stopped being leanient towards men abusers and "systems of protection for women" put in place ... as well as "training" for the police force to implement the new guidelines etc ...

Unfortunately, any form of democracy does not and cannot by definition allow for any one culture to remain dominant but does encourage the demise of one...
The homogeneous Europeans of England, as with the rest of Europe as a whole still far outnumber both the converted and migrant population that have come into the European zone/ countries. The noxious form of democracy that would allow the majority to suffer the loss of their historic and cultural heritage must then change...evolve into something that will guarantee our common heritage. If History has taught us anything about cultural survival it was during 11th century Spain's Crusade to liberate its land from the Moors and come to 'an arrangement' that was of mutual satisfaction to both peoples. Valencia became the first truly integrated European city in Europe between Muslims and Christians, as did Salamanca and others. Baring the human predisposition for greed and power by a few Monarchs, it could have and would have remained as a good example in how to integrate and yet leave European culture, dominance and heritage intact, to the mutual guarantees of people's rights and obligations under the peace that was agreed to. Perhaps, now, more than ever, that situation should should be more closely examined and the ideas of both ecumenical and ecclesiastic courts be re thought to deal with all religious matters with perhaps 'legal advisers' from both Rome and Mecca...
Both Muslims and Christians as a general rule have great respect for Law, be it civil or Religious; in most Muslim countries it is the leaders that do not and we are seeing the civil disturbances as a general result of their rule and secular minded despotism in basically ignoring their peoples and their Koran. Their peoples are sick of it and want change, now, not later, down the road sometime. We cannot find fault in their aspirations to progress out of dictatorial rule.

Might you be a little confused Conor?

Yes domestic violence still exists in the West. There are laws to chastise domestic violence from BOTH men AND women in the West. And yes if the victim goes ahead and puts in an official complaint it WILL go to court. It is simply illigal to assault someone.

Now in some countries, it is legal for MEN to assault WOMEN "a little bit" within certain guidelines ...

And you are saying that at least the physical damage is minimised thanks to those "welcome guidelines". Bearing in mind that those "allowed beatings" can be administered for a simple "desobidience" like going to visit a sister when she was told she wasn't allowed to ...

You are also saying that since violence occurs in the west anyway why not have those "beating guidelines" in place to contain it? Yeah?

How about this then ...
Since armed robbery still goes on in the west, even though it's illigal, why don't they (the law) put in place "robbing guidelines" that allow "a little bit of robbing" then the robbers won't feel compelled to shoot their victims to elliminate witnesses

Where?

Wow that is a very smart respond to a thread that is meant to give people information. You are a noble.

Is there any significant "formal act" benefiting the condition of being muslim in your disadvantage?

Hold your horsies there, I neither said nor implied any such thing, I was merely contrasting the two systems and concluded that if I was a woman vulnerable to a beating I'd prefer to be a Muslim female than a western one. While its against the law in the west that law is rarely upheld and so is irrelevant at least in Muslim countries if they are a s devout as we're led to believe then as a woman you stand a better chance.

I don't know what its like in Spain but you rarely hear of men or women being charged with battery here and we all know it goes on, so the fact of it being against the law is neither here nor there. If I'm to have a beating I'll have the humane beating anyday.