Do you think the mods were too hasty .. (140)
Yes, they should have asked me first before making any desicions. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: In removing the banning option from a thread .
I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
The best moderation is always 'self - moderation' and ideally people would be a considerate as to what they post! I'm all for freedom of speech , but has caused some negativity, as far as giving trolls the opportunity to sabotage blogs & vent their frustrations ?
But
we no longer live in a civilised society and the loony left (esp) seem to regard 'ordinary civility' impossible unless they hold power ... and one can only begin to imagine their excesses if they DO ever hold sway again ???So far as MBs and the like - my own thoughts are that it's reasonable to expect the TA (Thread Author) or OP (Original Poster) to act as a 'responsible host' and to maintain order in their thread 'as if' the debate were taking place in their own home ...
Those who can't behave would soon find themselves no longer welcome and (the less dense) would simply not bother 'contributing' their negativity n BS ?
And, perhaps the Site Mods might 'take an interest' in who's threads were being well run and who was creating threads 'just for the sake of being controversial and stirring the muck?' Creating a ban on the creation of new threads might be a powerful tool to consider ...
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: I'd rather be a whiner than someone who judges people solely on their political preference.
mind if I call you Whinie then?
------ This thread is Archived ------
I would never use that option anyway, people are free to make whatever they like of themselves...
------ This thread is Archived ------
I think the Mods should introduce a 'Nuke' button. I want to see my enemies burning in a little emoticon, with screaming sound effects. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
MisterForYou: I think the Mods should introduce a 'Nuke' button. I want to see my enemies burning in a little emoticon, with screaming sound effects.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: mind if I call you Whinie then?
Everything is like a wall , said the scholar to the troll.Bang your head & go on though. Then you'll see there's no queue!
------ This thread is Archived ------
HexagonKeySet: The best moderation is always 'self - moderation' and ideally people would be a considerate as to what they post!
But we no longer live in a civilised society and the loony left (esp) seem to regard 'ordinary civility' impossible unless they hold power ... and one can only begin to imagine their excesses if they DO ever hold sway again ???
So far as MBs and the like - my own thoughts are that it's reasonable to expect the TA (Thread Author) or OP (Original Poster) to act as a 'responsible host' and to maintain order in their thread 'as if' the debate were taking place in their own home ...
Those who can't behave would soon find themselves no longer welcome and (the less dense) would simply not bother 'contributing' their negativity n BS ?
And, perhaps the Site Mods might 'take an interest' in who's threads were being well run and who was creating threads 'just for the sake of being controversial and stirring the muck?' Creating a ban on the creation of new threads might be a powerful tool to consider ...
The trolls just need someone to hate.But we no longer live in a civilised society and the loony left (esp) seem to regard 'ordinary civility' impossible unless they hold power ... and one can only begin to imagine their excesses if they DO ever hold sway again ???
So far as MBs and the like - my own thoughts are that it's reasonable to expect the TA (Thread Author) or OP (Original Poster) to act as a 'responsible host' and to maintain order in their thread 'as if' the debate were taking place in their own home ...
Those who can't behave would soon find themselves no longer welcome and (the less dense) would simply not bother 'contributing' their negativity n BS ?
And, perhaps the Site Mods might 'take an interest' in who's threads were being well run and who was creating threads 'just for the sake of being controversial and stirring the muck?' Creating a ban on the creation of new threads might be a powerful tool to consider ...
Someone to fill their empty lives . A villain to make them feel like heros
------ This thread is Archived ------
HexagonKeySet: The best moderation is always 'self - moderation' and ideally people would be a considerate as to what they post!
But we no longer live in a civilised society and the loony left (esp) seem to regard 'ordinary civility' impossible unless they hold power ... and one can only begin to imagine their excesses if they DO ever hold sway again ???
So far as MBs and the like - my own thoughts are that it's reasonable to expect the TA (Thread Author) or OP (Original Poster) to act as a 'responsible host' and to maintain order in their thread 'as if' the debate were taking place in their own home ...
Those who can't behave would soon find themselves no longer welcome and (the less dense) would simply not bother 'contributing' their negativity n BS ?
And, perhaps the Site Mods might 'take an interest' in who's threads were being well run and who was creating threads 'just for the sake of being controversial and stirring the muck?' Creating a ban on the creation of new threads might be a powerful tool to consider ...
Don't believe the hype !!But we no longer live in a civilised society and the loony left (esp) seem to regard 'ordinary civility' impossible unless they hold power ... and one can only begin to imagine their excesses if they DO ever hold sway again ???
So far as MBs and the like - my own thoughts are that it's reasonable to expect the TA (Thread Author) or OP (Original Poster) to act as a 'responsible host' and to maintain order in their thread 'as if' the debate were taking place in their own home ...
Those who can't behave would soon find themselves no longer welcome and (the less dense) would simply not bother 'contributing' their negativity n BS ?
And, perhaps the Site Mods might 'take an interest' in who's threads were being well run and who was creating threads 'just for the sake of being controversial and stirring the muck?' Creating a ban on the creation of new threads might be a powerful tool to consider ...
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: Don't believe the hype !!
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
Was meat for Arthur sixpence!In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: Don't believe the hype !!
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: Don't believe the hype !!
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
In some darkened corner, an evil troll called karma is rolling on the floor, laughing hysterically.
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
I assume that's 'bad' karma Conrad.
------ This thread is Archived ------
h the heady days of summary execution of you enemies, they were hasty in taking it away
------ This thread is Archived ------
bodleing2: I assume that's 'bad' karma Conrad.
Daffinitely!------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: I generally find that those who are too quick to hit the ban button , are either not worth my time , or they don't like an opinion other than their own !
I think that is likely the reason why the ban function was removed. Some were abusing it constantly and seemed to enjoy having that power over others.------ This thread is Archived ------
2intrigued: I think that is likely the reason why the ban function was removed. Some were abusing it constantly and seemed to enjoy having that power over others.
But sometimes their actions were merited .------ This thread is Archived ------
One2note: But sometimes their actions were merited .
Only sometimes...but you and I both know that some truly enjoyed having that ability to ban and had no trouble boasting about it afterward.....usually followed with a bunch of just to make sure it hit home.------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
s*xual skills
Unions support Democrats!
Kultur-multur
your favorite topic?
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
wanting beyond need
The weird and the random facts around the world
the way you look
Democrats destroyed America
men's perspective towards women
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
After reading the thread topics & the comments , would you enter this minefield ?
The Trolls and Incessant Dumb Thread Topic creators would sharp fade away if they were ignored but they're not, so they'll keep being the lame brains they are.
I'm being far too serious for this time of night.
Off to find drink.