The problem is that the independence of territories or changing boundaries are taboo subjects for governments, and the possible independence of Quebec would create a precedent.
I think people are very concerned about the rising water level of the sea to bring more to the earth, but if one of those comets crashed into Mars we could use those red wasteland.
Yes, but I don't understand what does that have to do with blasphemy. If the possibility of increasing fanaticism in Europe because of this new population believe that the views of the Queensland guy will also increase.
Not so obvious. Carefully read the above comments and you will notice that the laws does not define well what is the legal concept of insanity neither what should be the consequence in terms of justice. Someone who believes that everyone are his enemies and try to defend from themselves? someone who believes that killing is fun? someone who "hears voices" and feel the urge to kill? how to know if he really thinks so? Of course at a University of Medicine does not teach students the legal definition of insanity, but neither at the Universities of law.
Much has been said about Greece, but if Europe has to hold Spain and other countries with problems will be like swimming with a ton of lead on the back.
I´m not sure about the survival of the euro, but I prefer to believe you.
I really do not live under Christian rule, so those who do not live under a religious government enjoy greater freedom. Otherwise I think there would be no major differences between living under Christian or Muslim rule. Are much alike.
The ocean is for fishes, land for us. Sharks are no cute but they have the right to live in their element.
In Australia some people want to kill sharks to protect surfers and swimmers. I don't think it could be possible, especially in the seas around Australia, where live a lot of dangerous creatures.
I understand why weed is before other drugs, but I don't understand why cocain is before heroin. Heroin is very addictive, but coke too and is very destroyer to brain.
I think it's better to enjoy those things that waste your time singing hallelujahs or looking for explanations (unless you work for NASA or get paid for it).
Many people are wise, for example those who accept they don't know what could be the origin of Universe.
Others keep an ethical behavior without having a religion, and many keep an ethical behavior BECAUSE THEY HAD A RELIGION.
In any case, that doesn't change the fact that many do not have any scientific knowledge and they support the Big Bang theory, simply because they dislike religion.
Can you explain exactly what was the Big Bang, why it didn't happen before or after, what was the reason, the cause?
If you know it, congratulations, but you can listen everyday supporters of the Big Bang theory that not even know who was Newton or Kopernik.
RE: Are you for or against Quebec separation from Canada?
The problem is that the independence of territories or changing boundaries are taboo subjects for governments, and the possible independence of Quebec would create a precedent.