It Might Be a Recession, Fed Chief Tells Congress

Bernanke, Using a Word Rarely Uttered by Top Officials, Lays Out a Litany of Economic Problems


By Neil Irwin and Renae Merle
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, April 3, 2008; Page A01

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke acknowledged yesterday for the first time that the United States may be in a recession, projecting that the economy could shrink during the first half of this year.

"It now appears likely that real gross domestic product will not grow much, if at all, over the first half of 2008 and may contract slightly," Bernanke told the congressional Joint Economic Committee. In response to a question, he said "a recession is possible" -- a rare use of the word "recession" by a Fed chairman. Fed leaders traditionally worry about giving markets a reason for pessimism.

Bernanke's comments marked a notable shift in tone, reflecting continuing soft economic data and a view that the breakdown in financial markets poses a rising threat to the overall economy. Just over a month ago, Bernanke said he expected "sluggish economic activity" but did not mention a possible contraction.

He did say yesterday that he expects growth to strengthen in the second half of the year and to be solid in 2009, as the Fed's recent interest rate cuts and the government's fiscal stimulus package ripple through the economy.

Though he dismissed as an academic exercise the question of whether there is a recession, economic analysts said Bernanke's acknowledgment was significant.

"He's being much more candid and upfront about the problems and risks in the economy," said Brian A. Bethune, U.S. economist at the consulting firm Global Insight. "This testimony says that the Fed isn't in denial anymore."

That deepening concern about the economy helps explain the central bank's dramatic actions over the past month to help credit markets, including its intervention to save the Wall Street giant Bear Stearns. With the investment bank on the brink of bankruptcy, the Fed brokered Bear's sale to J.P. Morgan Chase and agreed to back $29 billion in risky securities on Bear Stearns's books.

Bernanke strongly defended those moves yesterday, arguing that problems in the financial markets would have become much worse had Bear Stearns been allowed to fail. Those problems already make it more expensive for people to borrow money to buy a house or car and for businesses to borrow so they can expand. That in turn undermines efforts by the Fed to promote growth by cutting interest rates.

Bernanke gave little indication of whether, or how much, the Fed would cut interest rates at its next policymaking meeting, April 30. Starting in September, the central bank has cut the short-term rate it controls by three percentage points, to 2.25 percent.

In his sober presentation, Bernanke offered a tour of the problems besetting the economy.

"The unemployment rate edged down in February and remains at a relatively low level," he said. "However, in light of the sluggishness of economic activity and other indicators of a softer labor market, I expect it to move somewhat higher in coming months."

Consumers are also pulling back, he said. "Concerns about employment and income prospects, together with declining home values and tighter credit conditions, have caused consumer spending to decelerate."



Continued

The Price of Protection

Hey, Great idea! We could take bets on the winner and give all the money to Charity!!!

They like to get down and dirty...

The Price of Protection

You are to be commended Zarah!wine

I have been helping drug addicts overcome addiction for over 20 years. Also, feed the homeless, pay utility bills for those less fortunate and provide them with food and clothing. It can seem unrewarding and trying so much of the time. But when success comes for just one life that you have touched, it makes all of your efforts so worth it!!!

It is a shame to see all of this money go to waste, when it could benefit so many who really need it.

Yes, I said waste. I think it is such a waste of money. Just because Hillary and Obama can't be mature, and they want to fight with each other, our tax dollars have to pay. Just shows how much they really have the American people at heart. They really want to represent us and do right by us. Excuse me but to that I say... Hogwash!

The Price of Protection

The Price of Protection



April 03, 2008 12:00 PM

ABC News' Melissa Chee Reports: The United States Secret Service estimates they spend upwards of $76,000 per day protecting Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., as they wage an extended battle for the Democratic nomination.

U.S. Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan told the House Committee on Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security that each candidate's protection detail costs taxpayers roughly $38,000 a day -- a figure expected to increase to $44,000 a day as the campaign heats up and the number of events per day increases.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the presumptive Republican nominee, has not yet requested Secret Service protection.

Testifying at a hearing entitled "Candidate Protection: Balancing the U.S. Secret Service Workload", Sullivan noted the Service initiated protection for Obama earlier than any other candidate in history when they assigned a protective detail to the junior Senator from Illinois in May 2007.

Sen. Clinton, in her capacity as a former first lady, was already assigned a protective detail.

Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the Democratic presidential nominee in 2004, was not assigned Secret Service protection until February of that year.

Sullivan also confirmed that the Secret Service will be the lead federal law enforcement agency during Pope Benedict XVI's forthcoming trip to the United States.

Well, well, well... All of these tax dollars being spent, YOUR tax dollars... How do you feel, knowing how much it is costing us to protect these people? HL

RE: The Speech Of a Lifetime

To respond to girlsgotit:
The American people are no longer going to pour money into third world Hell holes and watch those government leaders grow fat on corruption.
I would never refer to the third world countries as hell holes. This is disrespectful and can breed bad vibes with other nations.
I would state that I would no longer support corrupted leaders of any nation.



Need help with a famine ? Wrestling with an epidemic? Call France .
Part of what made America America, is our giving aid to those less fortunate. I would not name another country here. I would continue to allow those with a heart to bring food and medical support to hurting countries, no matter who they are, to do so. They would finance this by their own means, not our tax dollars.



In the future, together with Congress, I will work to redirect this money toward solving the vexing social problems we still have at home . On that note, a word to terrorist organizations. Screw with us and we will hunt you down and eliminate you and all your friends from the face of the earth.
Is this not the same message the Bush Admin. is trying to get across? Not cool.



Thirsting for a gutsy country to terrorize? Try France or maybe China ..
Again, I would not name names.
I am ordering the immediate severing of diplomatic relations with France , Germany , and Russia .. Thanks for all your help, comrades. We are retiring from NATO as well.
I would meet with NATO and discuss my decision with these Nations and let them know that the US is withdrawing, if that were my decision. I would get us out of the UN first!!!


A special note to our neighbors. Canada is on List 2. Since we are likely to be seeing a lot more of each other, you folks might want to try not pissing us off for a change.
Again I would not be RUDE! I respect Canada and would never disrespect them like this.


Mexico is also on List 2 its president and his entire corrupt government really need an attitude adjustment . I will have a couple extra thousand tanks and infantry divisions sitting around. Guess where I am going to put 'em? Yep, border security.
I would bring no threat to Mexico. Not have tanks or military at the boarders.


LOL, perhaps you should have asked me what I agreed with. The list was shorter.

RE: What has happened to CNN?

Understandable, but this is not the case here. They extensively report that the building has also collapsed. The Solomon building, which is WTC7.

Watch the video it's just less than 3 minutes in length.

RE: The Speech Of a Lifetime

HP, some of this would be music to our ears. I have often wondered why we don't do just this. Be an independant nation.

However, we will not have a president say these things, as they are not the ones who are in control. They have been bought out by the powerful elite. The CFR and Fed.

I do disagree with some of your negative statements, someone elses statements of course, I see this was sent to you in an email. I received it too, a while back.

It's okay to disagree so I will leave it at that.

Good food for thought!

RE: What has happened to CNN?

Maybe they aren't allowed to. They receive their orders and are told what can be reported and how it is to be presented. Reporters get in trouble for just going out and giving us the news. It has to be "politically correct". The guild sensors our news.

I watched a video from BBC, on 9/11 where the reporter is saying that WTC7 just fell to the ground. The building is standing, in the background behind her. The building fell 20 minutes later, if I recall correctly. Somebody jumped the gun... oooops!

Toward a New U.S.-Middle East Strategy:

Yes, it is, isn't it?

They make the decisions for the entire world!

BTW, thanks for your comment on the oil prices thread.
I ment to comment back to you.
Very good response!

Toward a New U.S.-Middle East Strategy:

Have no fear girlfriend! I sent you a personal email concerning this. Keep up the good work.

Now, this enquiring mind wants to know what you have to say concerning this!

bouquet hug

RE: Witnessing a Dance Leading to Friendship

Yes it did Jim.

Now, I value your friendship more than can be expressed through words.

We each have so much we can contribute to the lives of others. There is always common ground.

We are ALL human. Good enough reason for a start of friendship.

Here's to you goose!


cheers hug lips

Where to buy American (not foreign) Gasoline

Great Info lovestrees! Thanks for sharing! I have read up on Chavez and his lowering prices to the poor. Our government doesn't like him cos he can't be manipulated by them. Chavez hates Bush and so do I.
I do not think he's such a bad guy myself. Some may want to visit his stations just to go against Bush, lol. I received an email once telling us to do just that, LOL.

Toward a New U.S.-Middle East Strategy:

Council on Foreign Relations Partners with the Saban Center at Brookings on Middle East Strategy for the Next President

February 14, 2008
Council on Foreign Relations

Contact:
CFR Communications, 212-434-9888, communications@cfr.org
Brookings Office of Communications, 202-797-6105, communications@brookings.edu

The next U.S. president will face multiple challenges in the Middle East when he or she takes office in January 2009. Numerous crises and concerns in the region will remain on top of the U.S. foreign policy agenda: the conflict in Iraq, Iran’s nuclear and regional ambitions, the Arab-Israeli conflict and the push for a Palestinian state, Lebanon’s continued political instability, the threat of radical Islamic terrorism, and political and economic reform efforts across the Middle East and Gulf regions.

The Council on Foreign Relations and the Saban Center at Brookings are undertaking an ambitious initiative to develop a nonpartisan blueprint for the next U.S. president, one which can be used as the foundation for the new administration’s Middle East policy.

The strategy group will conduct in-depth research, undertake fact-finding trips to the region, generate dialogue with regional officials, and consult with American policymakers. The project is staffed by Middle East experts from both organizations and will result in a published report in November 2009, titled, “Toward a New U.S.-Middle East Strategy.”

Richard N. Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations, and Strobe Talbott, president of Brookings, are co-chairs of an advisory board that includes former national security advisors Sandy Berger, Brent Scowcroft, and Zbigniew Brzezinski, and former deputy director of intelligence Jami Miscik. The directors of the project are Martin S. Indyk, director of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution, and Gary Samore, vice president, director of Studies, and Maurice R. Greenberg Chair at the Council of Foreign Relations.

“We’ve gathered a strong team of experts to tackle the toughest foreign policy problems the next administration will face,” said Samore. “With team trips to the region and advice from our advisory board, we hope to produce a set of recommendations to help the new administration develop an effective Mideast policy.”

“In a year marked by escalating conflict in the Middle East, the U.S. faces an array of challenges from the conflict in Iraq to Iran’s pursuit of nuclear arms to a latent Middle East peace process,” said Indyk. “The importance and urgency of these issues will require the next president to hit the ground running. By bringing together the best minds on the Middle East to think and write about these issues ahead of time, we hope to provide the next president with a Middle East strategy blueprint that he or she can use from day one.”

Many times durring Presidential Candidate Debates, they discuss what THEY will do concerning foreign policy. CFR structures foreign policy, shown above from their own website. They have "think tanks", groups of schollars who decide the fate of the world. If you think the Presidents are running the show and making the decisions... NOT!
This is why I don't like those who are affilliated with CFR, the great Puppetmasters.

Do you think all of the countries of the world need to follow the guidelines of the schollars at CFR? Seems to me, they leave out the desires of "We the People", they don't ask us what we think about it. We have no Vote in it. Something to think about when you hear candidates discussing Foreign Policy. They do what the Puppetmaster tells them! HL

RE: Witnessing a Dance Leading to Friendship

Today reminded me of my childhood.

Whenever new kids moved into the neighborhood, we would pick fights with them. Call them names, throw rocks, and be really really mean to them all day long. Come nightfall, we made friends and remained friends until they moved away.

I actually thought of this many times durring our debate.

So funny!

RE: Witnessing a Dance Leading to Friendship

May I have this dance?dancing

Yes, it was very challenging at times prncss

And neither one of us backed down rolling on the floor laughing



dance


If the rest of the world could follow suit, maybe we could all just get along!

Life's a Dance, you learn as you go.
Sometimes you lead, sometimes you follow.

Great to have you as my new FRIEND!




yay reunion elephant buddies rose conversing cheers handshake hug

RE: Answer a question with a question....

Certainly... Would you have it any other way?

RE: Answer a question with a question....

It is very hot. You want some too?

What a Black Columnist has to say about Obama

Yeah, someone wrote it in an email I received. Don't know who. They added it to the article. Put it on here to see if anyone thought it was probable. Not likely as far as I am concerned. I think the anti-christ is Communism, not a person.

RE: I'm new here... so here goes my first "thread"...

Yeah, Prunes are Very useful to the OLD! rolling on the floor laughing

RE: I'm new here... so here goes my first "thread"...

I toast to the days when I could get a date!!!

tongue

RE: Politics and Religion

You are Too Much Hugz!

Glow in the dark beer dispenser???

LMAO for 5 minutes!!!

rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing

Tears are rolling down my cheeks

RE: Politics and Religion

22 years

Used to spend a lot of time in Phoenix. Hung out at Church on the Street, did outreaches with them on the weekends.

RE: I'm new here... so here goes my first "thread"...

wave Savor!

It was so very long ago, yet I do still remember blushing

I too was at a dance, in Miami, Florida.

The band was playing "Mechanical World" by Spirit.

There was a fenced in area out back with benches.

A boy who lived across the street whom I had a severe crush on,
Glenn was his name. He kissed me. My friends timed it rolling on the floor laughing
two and a half minutes!

WOW lips

RE: At this moment......

I get it Leo.

We must do our part to help others as often as we can. Realize that everything we have is not our own. Be self-less and giving. Acts of kindness are acts of love. Love changes lives.

I would embrace you if I could.

There's a geographic problem which prevents it tonight.

hug

Where to buy American (not foreign) Gasoline

This is from the website spicygamble gave reference to.
Very Important Info:

Can consumers reduce the revenues flowing to a certain country or countries by boycotting companies that have a history of importing from those countries?

Due to the global nature of the oil market, boycotts by individual consumers or even individual countries cannot reduce the oil revenues of a given oil producing country/countries. At best, consumer boycotts of a company known to import crude oil would result in a temporary reduction in the market share of that particular company. Because the overall consumer demand for products made from oil (like gasoline and diesel fuel) would be unchanged, the oil would simply be purchased by some other company.

Similar market shifts would occur if an entire country or countries refused to buy oil from a certain country/region, or were legally prevented from doing so. The boycotting countries would take additional imports from different countries, and those countries would purchase additional supplies from the boycotted country/region. Due to the nature of the world oil market, it is impossible to impact the oil revenues flowing to a given country or region with anything short of a sanctions regime, wherein all countries pledge to avoid buying from a particular country.

Do consumers impact gasoline prices?

Consumers have very little power as individuals but, if enough consumers give the same “market signal,” they can impact prices. First, when consumers buy gasoline at service stations in their areas with the lowest price, they take market share away from higher-priced stations; these stations may then eventually reduce their prices to be more competitive. The second way consumers impact the market is by reducing gasoline consumption. If enough people reduce driving or switch to more energy-efficient vehicles, gasoline demand would decline and prices would be dampened.

Where to buy American (not foreign) Gasoline

Thanks Spicey! As a trucker, I have been in the refineries and the bulk terminals. Especially in Texas City, along the gulf coast. Foreign tankers as well as domestic, from off shore rigs, bring it in by the boat loads. Having never worked in the refinery, I would have no idea of the process they use to sort it all out or mix it.

So, maybe it's kinda like the oranges. The oil companies are all getting a cut from selling to each other. dunno

Where to buy American (not foreign) Gasoline

I know that we do not have enough refineries stateside to refine the crude we have. We also export much of our oil to other countries... it's all in the name of Free Trade.

Same reason I haul oranges from California to Florida, and oranges from Florida to California. So much waste. There are so many ways we could save money and resources, but Big Business won't allow it.

The US does not want to rid itself of foreign dependance on oil. The investors will never allow it and they are in the politicians pockets.

Consumers really don't care. They would rather drive around in the SUV's and Hummers thinking they are cool. America is very wasteful.

There is much room for improvement but it won't happen. There are other sources for fuel, but oil is Big Money and the politicians make money off of investing in it.

RE: Politics and Religion

Hey.... where can I pick up some of that money???

I am always taking care of charitable people. Need funding!



I want to see Trish with the pope hat on! And the A line dress!

RE: Politics and Religion

wave Jim! Took a few days off for the Truckers Strike hoping for lower diesel prices.

RE: Politics and Religion

>>>>>>>goes off to think about why to kiss the ring dancing








Surely I will think of somethin'


...moping can't do it for nothin

This is a list of forum posts created by HealthyLiving.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here