At first glance the woman is religiously ordinary and in her first message the woman will encapsulate banality. In her mind sending the first message is exceptional in itself and therefore the content is anything but.
And what happens when social cripple becomes the social norm?
On this site there are blogs dedicated to the breakdown of relations with any attempt to understand anybody else regarded as your own personal weakness. Their ego considers basic social skills as seeking approval or acceptance - which it is and there's nothing wrong with that - and this is what I mean by the internet creating a socially crippled bunker people of egotistical madmen.
You look at generation Z and they can't maintain proper eye contact with people and you have to question that. What will be the outcome of this inhuman and detached way of "relating" to people fostered on the internet and now becoming second nature?
If anything commuinicating online would be good for people who already have diagnosed autism and are at the beginning of learning regular behaviour. And I fear the opposite. If you're not a social cripple being on here will turn you into one.
Now normally a revolution requires revolutionary circumstances but amongst an increasingly autistic people you may get a civil war by each side making an absolute mountain out of a molehill. Hysterical egotism is the revolutionary circumstance.
Even politically I think it shows online and in the real world. Autistic people are more likely to be a Marxist or a Capitalist - depending on whether they're motivated by naivety or spite - and be extremely partisan about it. Mixed economies and judging each case on its merits are a big no no. Ideology attempts to hyper-systemise human behaviour instead of relating to it, you don't really appreciate mankind as a mixed bag and amongst an increasingly autistic people the centre ground will not hold. The concept of moderation is anathema and the internet is breeding two tribes at war because of the autistic drift inherent to cyberspace.
I'm fairly convinced that environment and influence matter. For example when online people talk over people more than they listen, the medium itself leans towards autism in its routine, absence of social cues and human faces and the whole point of online is to sort of hunker down in your bunker avoiding the challenge of unpredictability of life in a laboratory condition. This forum is like an academic bubble without the academics.
Where does aspergers end and bullish egotism begin?
How would you define somebody who is socially autistic in an amusing way you might describe as charmspergers(think Donald Trump)? And then there's Barron, would Barron be less visibly autistic if he had been raised by a very non-autistic father?
Understand that's only what I've heard through the grapevine, but from 3 different people just randomly saying the same thing. But my own experience with Aussies was them laughing so much it kept the whole block of flats awake and I find Australians are like rich people - they don't understand about not taking other people's stuff or rights, they tend to walk all over you in that happy go lucky way affluent people do.
That's so me and that's so not me says every intelligent person who ever lived. But there's the gait and toe-walking, walking around with crap arms like a dinosaur. Some people could think they have autism when actually they've just been spoilt and over-indulged, convenience culture making people not entertain anything they don't like.
Nothing in excess. It's pretty cold when a woman flirts 24/7 for drinks or attention knowing nobody would like her otherwise. It's bad when women coast through life as a cockteasing one-trick pony.
American politicians would love the debate to be over with, the politicians are trying quite hard although that's not a very fashionable thing to say. The dead children are the responsibliity of the American people and their priorities.
The truth is we've not been this far away from a new world order since The Marshall Plan. It's more true to say that a system of global control that at one time kept not very talented Americans comfortable is today breaking down and they're trying to rcapture their old position through an autocrat. A bit like how Russia yearns for Soviet glory through Putin. Living vicariously through the autocrat is built on failed ambitions, shattered dreams and boring jobs.
It's like Trump sacking people in public. By doing this he is inviting his people to live vicariously through him creating in his fans a sense of relevance and participation which is a substitute for having any real influence. As long they're the chosen ones in for the ride they don't care much for where the ride takes them, the emotional experience of being taken for a ride. Being played is better than being totally forgotten about and Trump represents for many people their one remaining connection to the outside world, the only person they feel close to and that bond that means more to them than reality ever could(it's like religion). Trump is bigger than Jesus to his fans.
That's not important. At breakfast the other morning I purchased a thimble of honey in a little glass jar wrapped in a bow, and it cost me nearly £3. The perception that I'm significant for eating out of a little glass jar is worth more than the substance of the honey in my porridge - and that's salesmenship! Making chumps feel significant is what a salesmen does.
That's so American. Win the lottery and the first thing you think of hiring lawyers, pointing guns at people and rationalising reasons to be selfish with money you didn't even earn.
Germany is a well-ordered machine and there are few people who want to change the chemistry. Compromise and long-term thinking feature more in the societies which lost and were hammered by the war, instant gratification and pass the buck come from those spoon-fed as children by the spoils of war(the over 50s of Britain and especially America)who voted for blind greed in the 1980s as selfish yuppy parasites.
I'd say Britain but only because of America's plan to turn the masses into Soylent Green. I'm exaggerating a little what I mean to say is everybody in America outside the wealthiest 20% is worse off
The less people leave their comfort zone the more you can predict what they're going to do - whittling peoples options down lies at the heart of stability and order and a lot of business wants this as do aging populations.
It's the intrusive end of demand management and protectionism will accelerate this trend towards circumscribed choice. You don't discover anything new or different because you're having the familiar thrust upon you.
ChesneyChrist Forum Posts (7,144)
RE: Worst Introductions
At first glance the woman is religiously ordinary and in her first message the woman will encapsulate banality. In her mind sending the first message is exceptional in itself and therefore the content is anything but.