I foresee a booster shot in your future...
As time goes on, your immunity will drop and it would be necessary to have a booster shot.That's my take on the subject.
Would YOU like to post a blog on Connecting Singles? Have you written blogs that you'd like to share with other members? Posting your blogs shows your skill and creativity and helps members get to know you better. Your blog will appear on the Connecting Singles Blogs page and also in a link on your profile page. Click here to post a blog »
Comments (17)
And they're planning 2 a year.
Whatever you wish to believe Chat
Pfizer said roughly the same thing while providing numbers.
Dan_777, "whatever you wish to believe, Chat." Isn't that true for everyone including you?
DaisyCat, agree!
Broad - Protects against variants.
Robust - The disease is unlikely to break through.
Durable - Long lasting ... Years or Lifetime - i.e. One & Done, like Chicken Pox.
How can you have a booster for it?
Just to inject more poison into your body?
Not tellin' anyone what they Should or should Not do ... But ...
Reports seem to be that ...
1) The Jab protects one from Severe cases of covid ... And ...
2) The Delta Variant is Less Severe.
If one's been Jabbed -
A Mild case of the Delta Variant - and Natural Durable IMMUNITY (One & Done) -
May be preferable to Never Ending Jabs ...
Recovering from an actual viral infection weakens the body in it's fight for survival.
As we have seen with Covid-19, it is a fight between the virus surviving and the host surviving.
There can be lasting side-effects to that.
In addition the immunity one gets from either a vaccine OR recovering from infection does not last forever. Just because you survived one variant, does not mean you will survive next year's variant.
Indeed, just because you survived one variant, does not mean you will survive the same variant next year. This is why vaccines not only include antigens from previous variants, but also the newer ones each year.
With regard to the current Covid-19 vaccines, the body is responding to the foreign spike protein.
However, the body does not have to actually fight to survive, as it would if it were the complete virus.
The virus can't kill you, because it is not included in the vaccine. Thus, for the vast majority of people, the vaccine is FAR safer than attempting to survive an actual infection, and the results last about as long, as for those who were lucky enough to have survived infection.
Thanks for the input and at least on this topic
a voice of reason, in my humble opinion.
Just heard on the News -
Israel became the 1st country to roll out a 3rd Jab.
Could be a yearly thing too, and if so I'll sign up for that also.
A bit like upgrading your operative system on your pc. Against virus hehe.
Wasn't Planning on it, but as long as it's here - I'm Good with it ...
They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand that is going into the cell is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment. But if it was discussed as a treatment, it would not get the sympathetic ear of public health authorities, because then people would say “What other treatments are there?”
I STRONGLY Suspect Big Pharma lawyers arranged to have the definition of "Vaccine" expanded to include mRNA so drug companies would be shielded from ALL Legal Liability.
Always follow the money, y'all.
With the mRNA versions, the difference is that instead of delivering the antigen directly,
a mRNA coding for the antigen protein is delivered instead.
EVERY vaccine could be considered a medical device. Indeed, both the needle and the syringe are medical devices, whether they are used for vaccinations, or not.
Reminds me of that "charming" guy whats his name. He seems to have disappeared!