Prove to me.... ( Archived) (622)

Mar 29, 2009 1:22 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: Thank you Conrad. Very well said.


Yes, I am asking Mike to explain the contradiction in the bible that Jesus is both a man and a god. roll eyes
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:23 PM CST Prove to me....
Conrad73: But that's what you all sticking to,by making the Son a God!
So Christianity is actually Pantheistic,not Monotheistic!



This was the last thing Keith Green struggled with before he became a Christian. He was an example, to all Christians, of how someone devoted to Jesus should live his life.

You would have been proud of him Conrad. He murdered hundreds and forced thousands to follow Christ.


giggle ...just joking. He read the bible, and then lived and sang what he read. You should read about him. He wasn't perfect, but he has been a great inspiration to me.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:39 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: This was the last thing Keith Green struggled with before he became a Christian. He was an example, to all Christians, of how someone devoted to Jesus should live his life.

You would have been proud of him Conrad. He murdered hundreds and forced thousands to follow Christ. ...just joking. He read the bible, and then lived and sang what he read. You should read about him. He wasn't perfect, but he has been a great inspiration to me.


So? Were you going to explain the contradiction?

"At yet another council, the council of Chalcedon (451 A.D.) the creed received some finishing touches and the Athanasian creed was declared official church teaching. Most Christians are not familiar with the detailed implications of the creed and in their own minds conceive of Jesus in the very ways the creed was formulated to deny. This tendency results from the fact that the creed’s definition of Jesus is impossible for any human mind to comprehend. One can only repeat the words, but cannot grasp the meaning of the required belief. Therefore most just repeat the creed with their lips but in their minds turn to views of Jesus that are less taxing on the intellect, even though those views were declared by the Church to be heretical."
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:39 PM CST Prove to me....
Oh, and I guess you missed this from page 26 as well...


I am glad you appreciated my explanation. I understand your not wanting to except it. It would mean admitting you were wrong, and I doubt I would ever get that from you. But I have established a viable alternative to just taking these passages to be contrary with each other. I am not sure what modern "Christian" scholars you are alluding to, but I never said Jesus was infinite when He was in human form. Just as the passage I provided shows, He was made low so He could experience humanity, suffer, and die. He did this willingly. He did this for us. He did it because the love He had for us gave Him no other choice. This is why He cried out in the garden. He was a man. He did have fear. But it was His faith that was stronger, and He went to the cross because of His love. He was God, for only God can bear the sins of the world. And in the end, there is no doubt who is God, for only God may be worshipped.

"So Jesus said to them, 'Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.'" Matthew 19:28

"All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." John 1:3

"the twenty-four elders fall down before Him who sits on the throne and worship Him who lives forever and ever, and cast their crowns before the throne, saying: You are worthy, O Lord, To receive glory and honor and power; For You created all things, And by Your will they exist and were created." Revelation 4:10


Second contradiction ? pointing
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:41 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa: So? Were you going to explain the contradiction?




I did on page 26, and a very good job at doing so if I don't mind saying so myself. wink
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:51 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
In response to: Forfeiting what? Are you challenging me in a post for post contest?


I am simply asking that you explain the contradictions because you are making a claim that there are none and that the bible is perfect.

In response to: I guess I will forfeit that.


Alright. How about this time you pick a contradiction you think you can explain. That is what I allowed you to do the first time.

In response to: Do you really enjoy arguing with me when you know you are over matched as far as the bible goes?


Really? Why not simply explain this contradiction then since you are so terribly superior in your biblical study. I think I have done pretty well thus far.

In response to: You have one trick and one trick only. Take a passage and use it out of context.


Okay if you truly think that is the case, then what do you want me to do? How can I post the entire bible? Does that mean you are also not allowed to post passage after passage? I don’t mind if you do that so why should you mind if I do it? Simply because you find what I am pointing out troublesome?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:52 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: I did on page 26, and a very good job at doing so if I don't mind saying so myself.


But you posted the SAME thing that I have refuted. The ball is in your court at this point. roll eyes
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:55 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: I did on page 26, and a very good job at doing so if I don't mind saying so myself.


This was my rebuttal. 2nd time posting.

In response to: I am glad you appreciated my explanation.


Yes I’m assuming it came from an apologetic website.


In response to: I understand your not wanting to except it.


It’s not a matter of "not accepting it." You didn’t explain the contradictions. Did you read my post? Modern Christian scholars reject this idea not because it is difficult to understand but because it cannot be meaningfully expressed. The doctrine cannot be stated in any way that is free from contradictions. It is impossible for Jesus to have been perfect man and perfect God at the same time, for this would mean that he was finite and infinite at the same time, that he was fallible and infallible at the same time. This cannot be.




In response to: But I have established a viable alternative to just taking these passages to be contrary with each other.


They are because the only passage that you supplied that was actually from the bible (and not simply just conjecture) on the part of the apologetics was open to interpretation as noted.


In response to: I am not sure what modern "Christian" scholars you are alluding to,


Theologians of the current day. Only evangelical Christians tend to still buy into the notion of "biblical inerrancy."


In response to: but I never said Jesus was infinite when He was in human form.


What the creed denies is also quite significant. The creed was formulated in response to the claims of various early Christian groups, and so includes clauses that deny the beliefs of those groups. In response to the Arians who believed that Jesus was not God, the Council of Nicea (325 A.D.) decreed that he was fully God.


In response to: Just as the passage I provided shows, He was made low so He could experience humanity, suffer, and die.


That passage is open to interpretation. Did Jesus die by the grace of god or apart from god? “Although almost all the surviving manuscripts state that Jesus died for all people ‘by the grace of God’ (CHARITI THEOU) a couple of others state, instead, that he died ‘apart from God’ (CHORIS THEOU). Heb 2:9 appears originally to have said that Jesus died ‘apart from God’, forsaken, much as he is portrayed in the Passion narrative of Mark’s Gospel…..There is also the question of why these words came to be changed…. One explanation is that the scribes who were not altogether satisfied with what the New Testament books said modified their words to make them more clearly support orthodox Christianity and more vigorously oppose heretics, women, Jews, and pagans.”


In response to: "So Jesus said to them, 'Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.'" Matthew 19:28


19:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

This is the very next passage. Abandon your wife and children for Jesus and he'll give you a big reward. Hrmmm.


In response to: "All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." John 1:3


But how could Jesus be with God in the beginning as this verse says, if, as the Watchtower teaches, Jesus was created by God? And how could Jesus be "a god" and yet be with God during the creation, if God was speaking truthfully?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 1:59 PM CST Prove to me....
In the Greek, when the definite article is used, it often stresses the individual, and, when it is not present, it refers to the nature of the one denoted. Thus, the verse can be rendered, "and the word was of the very nature of God." The full diety of Yahshua is supported not only by general usage of the same construction, but by other references in John to Yahshua being God ( 8:58; 10:30; 20:28 and the rest of the N.T. ( Col 1:15-16; 2:9; Titus 2:13)
Furthermore, some N.T. texts use the definite article and speak of Christ as "the God." So it does not matter whether John did or did not use the definite article here-- the bible clearly teaches that Jesus is God not just a god (Hebrews 1:8)
That Yahshua is Yahwah is clear from the fact that the NT attributes to Yahshua characterisitics which the OT apply only to YHWH (John 19:37) compared to (Zech 12:10)

Source: The Big Book of Bible Difficulties by Geisler and Howe

sigh Why do I continue to stoop to their level? moping
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:02 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa: This was my rebuttal. 2nd time posting.

In response to: I am glad you appreciated my explanation.Yes I’m assuming it came from an apologetic website. In response to: I understand your not wanting to except it.It’s not a matter of "not accepting it." You didn’t explain the contradictions. Did you read my post? Modern Christian scholars reject this idea not because it is difficult to understand but because it cannot be meaningfully expressed. The doctrine cannot be stated in any way that is free from contradictions. It is impossible for Jesus to have been perfect man and perfect God at the same time, for this would mean that he was finite and infinite at the same time, that he was fallible and infallible at the same time. This cannot be.

In response to: But I have established a viable alternative to just taking these passages to be contrary with each other.They are because the only passage that you supplied that was actually from the bible (and not simply just conjecture) on the part of the apologetics was open to interpretation as noted.In response to: I am not sure what modern "Christian" scholars you are alluding to,Theologians of the current day. Only evangelical Christians tend to still buy into the notion of "biblical inerrancy."In response to: but I never said Jesus was infinite when He was in human form.What the creed denies is also quite significant. The creed was formulated in response to the claims of various early Christian groups, and so includes clauses that deny the beliefs of those groups. In response to the Arians who believed that Jesus was not God, the Council of Nicea (325 A.D.) decreed that he was fully God.In response to: Just as the passage I provided shows, He was made low so He could experience humanity, suffer, and die.That passage is open to interpretation. Did Jesus die by the grace of god or apart from god? “Although almost all the surviving manuscripts state that Jesus died for all people ‘by the grace of God’ (CHARITI THEOU) a couple of others state, instead, that he died ‘apart from God’ (CHORIS THEOU). Heb 2:9 appears originally to have said that Jesus died ‘apart from God’, forsaken, much as he is portrayed in the Passion narrative of Mark’s Gospel…..There is also the question of why these words came to be changed…. One explanation is that the scribes who were not altogether satisfied with what the New Testament books said modified their words to make them more clearly support orthodox Christianity and more vigorously oppose heretics, women, Jews, and pagans.” In response to: "So Jesus said to them, 'Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.'" Matthew 19:2819:29 And every one that hath forsaken houses, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my name's sake, shall receive an hundredfold, and shall inherit everlasting life.

This is the very next passage. Abandon your wife and children for Jesus and he'll give you a big reward. Hrmmm. In response to: "All things were made through Him, and without Him nothing was made that was made." John 1:3But how could Jesus be with God in the beginning as this verse says, if, as the Watchtower teaches, Jesus was created by God? And how could Jesus be "a god" and yet be with God during the creation, if God was speaking truthfully?


This accomplishes what?

Oh, are you just one of those women who enjoy to arguing for no reason at all? giggle J/K
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:06 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: This accomplishes what?

Oh, are you just one of those women who enjoy to arguing for no reason at all? J/K


Well just pointing out that you seem to be implying that you "resolved" the contradiction. Tee hee. Generally in a debate setting, it does go back and forth until someone forfeits. Right now the next post would be due from you.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:06 PM CST Prove to me....
Well this is all the time I have today.

I will try to see you guys here tomorrow.

Since I refuse to get into a meaningless post for post battle, then I suppose I forfeit to Krimsa. yawn

Congrats Krimsa, you are the queen of the blah blah blah

Have a great night everybody. wave


gnite gnite gnite gnite gnite gnite gnite gnite
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:08 PM CST Prove to me....
giggle
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:11 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
Oh Mike stop being so melodramatic. I merely pointed out that the bible claims Jesus is both god and man! I dont care if you "forfeit."
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:17 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
MikeHD: In the Greek, when the definite article is used, it often stresses the individual, and, when it is not present, it refers to the nature of the one denoted. Thus, the verse can be rendered, "and the word was of the very nature of God." The full diety of Yahshua is supported not only by general usage of the same construction, but by other references in John to Yahshua being God ( 8:58; 10:30; 20:28 and the rest of the N.T. ( Col 1:15-16; 2:9; Titus 2:13)
Furthermore, some N.T. texts use the definite article and speak of Christ as "the God." So it does not matter whether John did or did not use the definite article here-- the bible clearly teaches that Jesus is God not just a god (Hebrews 1:8)
That Yahshua is Yahwah is clear from the fact that the NT attributes to Yahshua characterisitics which the OT apply only to YHWH (John 19:37) compared to (Zech 12:10)

Source: The Big Book of Bible Difficulties by Geisler and Howe

Why do I continue to stoop to their level?


"The orthodox doctrine is logically impossible. As Huston Smith, scholar of comparative religion, points out, it would not have been logically impossible if the creed said that Jesus was somewhat divine and somewhat human. But this is expressly what the creed denies. For orthodox Christians, Jesus cannot possess only some human qualities; he must possess all. He must be fully human. At the same time, he cannot possess only some divine qualities; he must have all. He must be fully divine. This is impossible because to be fully divine means one has to be free of human limitations. If he has only one human limitation then he is not God. But according to creed he has every human limitation. How, then, can he be God? Huston Smith calls this a blatant contradiction. In his book The World’s Religions, he writes:

We may begin with the doctrine of the Incarnation, which took several centuries to fix into place. Holding as it does that in Christ God assumed a human body, it affirms that Christ was God-Man; simultaneously both fully God and fully man. To say that such a contention is paradoxical seems a charitable way to put the matter — it looks more like a blatant contradiction. If the doctrine held that Christ was half human and half divine, or that he was divine in certain respects, while being human in others, our minds would not balk. (The World’s Religions, p. 340).

If it was said that Jesus was partly human and partly divine that would not be logically impossible but only scripturally impossible. The Bible nowhere teaches that Jesus was divine in any way. Furthermore, if he was only partly divine then he was not the One True God of the Old and New Testaments. God is All-Powerful, not somewhat all-powerful; God is All-Knowing, not somewhat all-knowing.

That "stoop to their level" comment was rude. I dont think that was called for at tall. moping
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:24 PM CST Prove to me....
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
Krimsa,
I'm just dropping in for a few mins here. There was an avowed atheist named George Rodonaia who had a NDE and came back to tell it after 3 days of being dead. He was clinically dead for all purposes but here is only a brief of his story. Look at or just google his name in.

BTW, when all bodily functions including brain stem functions cease to exist, the body immediately starts decomposing. It starts slowing cooling and rigor mortis sets in fairly soon. So putting someone in the refrigerated morgue after complete clinical death to slow down the decomposition(until burial and open wakes are done) and them coming back to life with a NDE to talk about is truly beyond medical science understanding. Too many ND experiences relate the same type of story but these people do not know each other. Now I'm not so sure that is explainable to science when these people do not know each other.
I believe that our body is on loan to us by God but that spirit or soul part of God is put into each and every one of us. Perhaps that would explain people coming back to tell of the God experience or the part MikeHD spoke of about Jesus as God in the body of man.

Dr. Rodonaia underwent one of the most extended cases of a “clinical near death experience” ever recorded. Pronounced dead immediately after he was hit by a car in 1976, he was left for three days in a morgue. He did not “return to life” until a doctor began to make an incision in his abdomen as part of an autopsy.

Another notable feature of Dr. Rodonaia’s near death experience – and this is common to many – is that he was radically transformed by it. Prior to his near death experience, he worked as a neuropathologist. He was also an avowed atheist. Yet after the experience, he devoted himself exclusively to studying the psychology of religion. He then became an ordained priest in the Eastern Orthodox Church. Today he serves as an associate pastor at the First united Methodist Church in Nederland, Texas.

“The first thing I remember about my near death experience is that I discovered myself in a realm of total darkness. I had no physical pain; I was still somehow aware of my existence as George, and all about me there was darkness, utter and complete darkness – the greatest darkness ever, darker than any dark, blacker than any black. This was what surrounded me and pressed upon me. I was horrified! I wasn’t prepared for this at all. I was shocked to find that I still existed, but I didn’t know where I was. The one thought that kept rolling through my mind was, ‘How can I be when I’m not?’ That is what troubled me.

Slowly, I got a grip on myself and began to think about what had happened, what was going on. But nothing refreshing or relaxing came to me. Why am I in this darkness? What am I to do? Then I remembered Descartes famous line: ‘I think, therefore, I am.’ And that took a huge burden off me, for it was then I knew for certain I was still alive, although obviously in a very different dimension. Then I thought, ‘If I am, why shouldn’t I be positive?’ That is what came to me. I am George and I’m in darkness, but I know I am. I am what I am. I must not be negative.

Then I thought, ‘How can I define what is positive in darkness?’ Well, positive is light. Then, suddenly, I was in light; bright, white, shinny and strong; a very bright light. It was like the flash of a camera, but not flickering – that bright. Constant brightness. At first I found the brilliance of the light painful. I couldn’t look directly at it. But little by little, I began to feel safe and warm, and everything suddenly seemed fine.

pg 1
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:25 PM CST Prove to me....
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
The next thing that happened was that I saw all these molecules flying around, atoms, protons, neutrons, just flying everywhere. On the one hand, it was totally chaotic, yet what brought me such great joy was that this chaos also had its own symmetry. This symmetry was beautiful and unified and whole, and it flooded me with tremendous joy. I saw the universal form of life and nature laid out before my eyes. It was at this point that any concern I had for my body just slipped away, because it was clear to me that I didn’t need it anymore -- that it was actually a limitation.

Everything in this experience merged together, so it is difficult for me to put an exact sequence to events. Time as I had known it came to a halt; past, present and future were somehow fused together for me in the timeless unity of life.

At some point, I underwent what has been called the “life-review process,” for I saw my life from beginning to end all at once. I participated in the real life dramas of my life, almost like a holographic image of my life going on before me – no sense of past, present or future, just now and the reality of my life. It wasn’t as though it started with birth and ran along to my life at the University of Moscow. It all appeared at once. There I was. This was my life. I didn’t experience any sense of guilt or remorse for things I’d done. I didn’t feel one way or another about my failures, faults or achievements. All I felt was my life for what it is. And I was content with that. I accepted my life for what it is.

During this time, the light just radiated a sense of peace and joy to me. It was very positive. I was so happy to be in the light. And I understood what the light meant. I learned that all the physical rules for human life were nothing when compared to this universal reality. I also came to see that a black hole is only another part of that infinity which is light. I came to see that reality is everywhere. This is not simply the earthly life but the infinite life. Everything is not only connected together, everything is also one. So I felt a wholeness with the light, a sense that all is right with me and the universe.

So there I was, flooded with all these good things and this wonderful experience, when someone begins to cut into my stomach. Can you imagine? What had happened was that I was taken to the morgue. I was pronounced dead and left there for three days. An investigation into the cause of my death was set up, so they sent someone out to do an autopsy on me. As they began to cut into my stomach, I felt as though some great power took hold of my neck and pushed me down. And it was so powerful that I opened my eyes and had this huge sense of pain. My body was cold and I began to shiver. They immediately stopped the autopsy and took me to the hospital where I remained for the following nine months, most of which I spent under a respirator.

Slowly, I regained my health. But I would never be the same again, because all I wanted to do for the rest of my life was study wisdom. This new interest led me to attend the University of Georgia where I took my second Ph.D., in the psychology of religion. Then I became a priest in the Eastern Orthodox Church. Eventually, in 1989, we came to America and I am now working as an associate pastor at the First United Methodist Church in Nederland, Texas.


pg 2
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:25 PM CST Prove to me....
LILLYLADY
LILLYLADYLILLYLADYunknown, Ohio USA27 Threads 1,293 Posts
Anyone who has had such an experience of God, who has felt such a profound sense of connection with the reality, knows that there is only one truly significant work to do in life and that is love; to love nature, to love people, to love animals, to love creation itself, just because it is. To serve God’s creation with a warm and loving hand of generosity and compassion – that is the only meaningful existence.

Many people turn to those who have had near death experiences because they sense we have the answers. But I know this is not true, at least no entirely. None of us will fully fathom the great truths of life until we finally unite with eternity at death. But in the meantime, it is our very nature to seek answers to our deepest questions about the near death experience and immortality.

pg 3
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:40 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
Thanks I have actually read that account before though. What I wanted to see was that older woman you were talking about and if her circumstances were new in some respect.

Also, did you catch my latest question to you? I asked why if as you seem to feel there is actual evidence that these resuscitations are supernatural in nature and absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt prove the existence of some sort of god, do we still have Atheists and Agnostics roaming the planet? If there was no question about this (which you implied) wouldn’t they all immediately convert to some religion?
confused
------ This thread is Archived ------
Mar 29, 2009 2:43 PM CST Prove to me....
krimsa
krimsakrimsaMiddleton, New Hampshire USA6 Threads 2 Polls 1,345 Posts
Also Lilly that link was dead so can you fix it? You probably just cut off something. Thanks
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here