God vs. Science ( Archived) (902)

MikeHD: What do you mean, "no one can testify to god as real"?How many do you think I could line up to testify that God is more real to them than any emotion they have ever felt?

I'll do it! I'll line them up!

And will find the craziest, most zealous, and totally opinionated people I can find...

just for some added entertainment value.

Can you imagine...

I get all the crazies from my side, and you get all the crazies (like Cro <-- sorry I could not resist) from your side, and we just pop some popcorn and watch the festivities.

Now that would be a party! Thats it for me tonight! I'm out!

MikeHD: Trish, I am sorry...

but you made me laugh.

You more described the way the thoery of evolution was derived than than what creationists have done. Thank you.

MikeHD: Yes, very poor.

Had to go back to school because I just got too poor. But I do find it interesting that the so-called thoery of evolution always bypasses step number 4.

Many people think of an experiment as something that takes place in a lab. While this can be true, experiments don't have to involve laboratory workbenches, Bunsen burners or test tubes. They do, however, have to be set up to test a specific hypothesis and they must be controlled. Controlling an experiment means controlling all of the variables so that only a single variable is studied. The independent variable is the one that's controlled and manipulated by the experimenter, whereas the dependent variable is not. As the independent variable is manipulated, the dependent variable is measured for variation. Controlling an experiment also means setting it up so it has a control group and an experimental group. The control group allows the experimenter to compare his test results against a baseline measurement so he can feel confident that those results are not due to chance. If this scientist is doing his job right, he's observing a control group and an experimental group.

I'm sorry, but I missed the part where scientist duplicated MACRO -evolution. Where they were able to observe evolution in a control environment so that comprehensive data could be collected.

I missed that part.

MikeHD: No Cro, only in the pure imagination of a few select men calling themselves scientist is the chance a billion to one. Try 1X10^64 (that is a 1 followed by 64 zeros) to one. I am sorry, but there are a ton of galaxies, and solar systems, and planets, but there are not anywhere close to that number.