THE President Actually! Preisdent Obama or President Romney? (882)

Maybe they did it to distract voters from the news that three of our leading anti-American world leaders have now endorsed Obama.

"President Obama appears to getting reelection support from three world leaders notorious for their anti-American views.

Venezuela President Hugo Chavez, after winning a fourth term earlier this month, reportedly said he would vote for Obama and that the president would likely vote for him.

The socialist-leaning ruler also reportedly called Obama a “good guy.”

His support follows that of the Castro family, which has ruled Cuba under a communist dictatorship for more than 50 years.

In June, Mariela Castro, the daughter of Cuban President Raul Castro, said in a CNN interview, translated into English: “As a citizen of the world, I would like (Obama) to win.”

And Russian President Vladimir Putin -- who is back in Moscow's driver's seat after a stint as prime minister -- has said the reelection of Obama could improve political relations between the two countries.


Read more:

I just looked at Obama's apprval rating today, compared to George Bush's on the same day in 2004....



Obama: 49.3 Approve 47.7 Disapprove Spread +1.6


Bush: 49.4 Approve 46.6 Disapprove Spread +2.8

Poor Dude. It must really hurt to know Obama is more unpopular then Bush now.

GWB nudged him out by a .1 Oh well still 15 day in the election to go and 90 days to Romney's oath.....Obama can be in the high 30s by then......wait till those new tax hit in early January 2013.

If the dang mainstream media would just do it's job they could dig all this up themselves. It's infuriating that they aren't publishing known facts deliberately to influence public opinion.

People are going to be SHOCKED to learn what's planned for 2013 if Obama gets re-elected. Between the new taxes, the people getting kicked off Medicare, and the new EPA regs - we will be well and truly screwed. I fault the media for keeping them in the dark until it's too late.

The State of California has several tax proposals on the ballot this year. If both are passed....and the state gets its sales tax increase. When combined with the Obama taxes increase.....the average Californian will pay 52 cents of every dollar earned in taxes.

He will be working more for the state, than he is for his life or family.

But Governor Brown....taking a page from President Obama book....wants those taxes and to tax the California wealthy.



It is because of allot of things. But mainly because the state has over spent. It does have government going into bankpucty. Then you have CA high speed rail

High speed rail has to have a ground breaking by Dec 31 of this year. Or the FED will pull their funds from the project.
Guess what that does to the CA unemployment rate....next year.
And Governor Brown has run into environmental issues on the High Speed rail



So some are saying it is already dead.

But CA had just passed the funding for the high speed rail just two weeks earlier. Tying up billions in the state treasury.


CA only has 9 week to break ground on high speed rail....or the FED stop the funding share. 9 weeks to resolve the environment issues of people like the Seirra Club, Audobon Society and a host of other CA environmental group.

See it really does not matter if the wealthy get taxed more. And you have these large billion dollar projects to fund. The taxes of the middle class are going to raise. The only way to keep it from happening....is to go with smaller government.

I would copyright my mistake as well. I just made election history. It might be the next Dewie beat Truman photo........LOL

Rick Scott was right in rejecting the high speed rail project they tried to sue us into taking.


Capital cost overruns from the project would have put Florida taxpayers on the hook for an additional $3 billion. And if you compare ridership and revenue projections to any other project, you see these projections are historically overly-optimistic and would likely result in ongoing subsidies that state taxpayers would have to incur (by some $300 million to $575 million over 10 years)

Also, if the project becomes too costly for taxpayers and is shut down, the state would have to return the $2.4 billion in federal funds to D.C.



Given the fact that there was nothing to support this plan, and every reason to reject it, it's a wonder Caifornia would support it given their dire financial circumstances. But that's a liberal for you. Take the money now and kick the can down the road for somebody else to deal with.

We should not pick on Nancy. She was just taking orders from the liberal executive committee deep inside the DEM party. The real behind the scene players that shape the DEMs and their political ideology.

Most have sons and daughter in the OWS....Howard Dean can move them on certain far left positions.

This is the group that did the DNC platform removal of ....God and Jersalum. The DEMs you never see and never vote on. Nancy, Harry, Barack, Joe.....are mainly their public face.

They are the reason that Joe gets mixed up. He reads their talking points without a teleprompter....and they come out "Iraq and Iran".
Harry that knows what Joe is suppose to say....has his hand in the air before the words are finished.

Harry, Joe, Barack and Nancy are just really DEM political pawns here. It is why you have so many versions on Libya. Until the DEM insiders knew how they wanted to spin it.....they did not have solid talking points to share.

Are we taking bets on what Trump's big news will be?

If so...here's my prediction.

"Stand Up America research team has learned from a senior and sensitive intelligence community source and official that President Obama did not know of the raid in Abbottabad to kill Osama Bin Laden on May 1st, 2011 until after the helicopters with SEAL TEAM 6 had crossed into Pakistani airspace. The US's most sophisticated deception techniques were used to make this very dangerous penetration into Pakistan without Pakistan knowledge. The President was notified at the golf course and called off the golf course which is why he was sitting in the strange sitting position in the picture that documented the White House operation room event.

Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) Leon Panetta was the key player who organized and supported this daring raid. He signed the "Execute Orders" with only a few people aware: Secretary of State Hilary Clinton, Secretary of Defense William Gates, Admiral Bill Mullen and General David Petraeus. The White House was closed out of the decision because the President through Valarie Jarrett had turned down two or three other earlier proposals. The Deputy of Central Intelligence (DCI) and his covert planning team were extremely frustrated at all the denials, so saw the opportunity slipping away as implausible as it seems. Leon Panetta was driven to ensure a successful mission after the US lost seven (7) CIA officers on January 4, 2010 in Afghanistan from the action of a Jordanian double agent. Panetta convinced his other principals to make the decision that was actually within his authority. He received their full-fledged support but the President according to the official remained clueless on the mission why he appeared so calm at the White House Correspondents Dinner the night before and why he was on the golf course when the helicopters crossed over Pakistani borders enroute to Abbottabad."

With a 112,168 voting in a yahoo poll that asked the question....

Does the administration's handling of the Libyan attack effect your vote?

55% said that it did
45% said that it didnot.

WoW......

That would explain why the night before in the Washington Press Corp diner....he was so at ease in the evening.

There's no reason to assume this will be Trump's news - but it IS intersting that both pieces of news crossed my desk at the same time.

Moreover, considering bin Laden is Obama's only real constructive accomplishment during this presidency, it would explain Trump's certainty that his news is "BIG."