What do you think about the Ark Encounter? (445)
EriK_tg: Precisely. But you are, in Biblical terms, a fool, and hence you laugh at it instead of it making sense to you. Highly unfortunate. For you, only.
Sunshine,all I have red by you so far,your Ignorant Arrogance stands you in Good Stead!---- IMAGE REMOVED because photobucket.com no longer allows embedded images ----
Amity: because it is a public forum, and i am entitled to post where i like.
I see you have lost your good manners as well? Now you purely trying to offend all.
I will leave you to it xxxx
Best wishes.
I see you have lost your good manners as well? Now you purely trying to offend all.
I will leave you to it xxxx
Best wishes.
"because it is a public forum, and i am entitled to post where i like."
That explains HOW you commented, not why.
Just FYI. I know it can be hard to explain oneself when one does things with no reason.
EriK_tg: "because it is a public forum, and i am entitled to post where i like."
That explains HOW you commented, not why.
Just FYI. I know it can be hard to explain oneself when one does things with no reason.
That explains HOW you commented, not why.
Just FYI. I know it can be hard to explain oneself when one does things with no reason.
To think i even defended you...you are someone who is preaching religion? "hey look at me....follow god and you can be as pompous and arrogant as me"
Yes..i can see many following.
EriK_tg: Precisely. But you are, in Biblical terms, a fool, and hence you laugh at it instead of it making sense to you. Highly unfortunate. For you, only.
Damn,you ran out of Steam quick!Told you before,you're lucky none of the Heavies are in this Thread!
The Youth of Today,sheesh!
No stamina!
EriK_tg: Show me a SINGLE direct question about theology that you allegedly asked you.
I don't have to answer complex questions. You are committing fallacies by asking me what I'm afraid of. I'm not motivated by fear. Your insistence upon saying so seems to indicate that perhaps you are fearful of something yourself. Are you afraid of encountering God and having to come to grips with being accountable to Him for your mistakes?
Why did I originally post? To see what people thought about the Ark being built. I thought that was pretty self-evident.
I don't have to answer complex questions. You are committing fallacies by asking me what I'm afraid of. I'm not motivated by fear. Your insistence upon saying so seems to indicate that perhaps you are fearful of something yourself. Are you afraid of encountering God and having to come to grips with being accountable to Him for your mistakes?
Why did I originally post? To see what people thought about the Ark being built. I thought that was pretty self-evident.
I wasn't asking you any questions about theology, I have no need to, I've read the Bible, studied it, and come to the conclusion the pages are too hard to use for asswipe, and they don't burn well unless you shred them first.
No, you don't have to answer anything you aren't comfortable in answering, or are afraid or unable to, it's ok.
To answer your question, no, I'm not afraid in the slightest, of encountering any gods, including your's. I'm responsible for my actions in my own lifetime, and have myself and my own conscience to answer to, not any ficticious beings man has created. I face my fears daily, without a crutch, can you say the same?
Your turn, if you have the guts to be honest.
Amity: To think i even defended you...you are someone who is preaching religion? "hey look at me....follow god and you can be as pompous and arrogant as me"
Yes..i can see many following.
Yes..i can see many following.
It's a shame you see it that way. Don't blame it on me, though, that'll only be bad for yourself. I'm not in charge of your decisions; you have to make them yourself.
kidatheart: I wasn't asking you any questions about theology, I have no need to, I've read the Bible, studied it, and come to the conclusion [that you have nothing intelligent to say about it]
Well then why are you accusing me of not answering your questions? Seems like a red herring to me.
EriK_tg: The Son of God is a title. Jesus is the Son of God because the Father is God and The Son of the Father would therefore be the Son of God. At the same time, the Son would also be God, because He is the second person of the Trinity.
Thus, the Son is the Son of God and God at the same time. Enjoy.
Thus, the Son is the Son of God and God at the same time. Enjoy.
with this answer you prove that you are defying the first commandment..you shall have no other God beside me..by the creation of this so called holy trinity..
God is just God..nothing else..
Jesus wanted to bring people back to God..not to be considered a God or equal to God...because then he himself would have gone against Gods commandment..and somehow I doubt very much that Jesus would have considered himself equal to the creator..
EriK_tg: Well then why are you accusing me of not answering your questions? Seems like a red herring to me.
Because you didn't answer them, which leads me to the conclusion that you're spineless for one, and here to sell AbMasters.
Grow a pair, join the human race.
iamwhoiamyousee: with this answer you prove that you are defying the first commandment..you shall have no other God beside me..by the creation of this so called holy trinity..
God is just God..nothing else..
Jesus wanted to bring people back to God..not to be considered a God or equal to God...because then he himself would have gone against Gods commandment..and somehow I doubt very much that Jesus would have considered himself equal to the creator..
God is just God..nothing else..
Jesus wanted to bring people back to God..not to be considered a God or equal to God...because then he himself would have gone against Gods commandment..and somehow I doubt very much that Jesus would have considered himself equal to the creator..
Doubt no longer. Read any one of the gospels. Jesus states several times that He was equal to God, which led the Jewish elders to try to stone Him for blasphemy, because as they saw it, He claimed to be God (it would be strange if He was not doing so, because then how could they believe that that's what He did?). Moreover, people worship Him, and only God can receive worship, but Jesus accepts worship. This is in contrast to the angels, who assertively deny worship aimed at them.
Cheers
EriK_tg: It's a shame you see it that way. Don't blame it on me, though, that'll only be bad for yourself. I'm not in charge of your decisions; you have to make them yourself.
Absolutely...In charge of myself, not being religious means i dont have to shove my believes down other peoples throats and then throw my toys out of the pram when im met with different opinions.
Yep i think i made the right choice
kidatheart: Because you didn't answer them, which leads me to the conclusion that you're spineless for one, and here to sell AbMasters.
Grow a pair, join the human race.
Grow a pair, join the human race.
Last time I'm responding to you, child. I'll lay it out very plainly for you.
1. You demanded that I answer your questions.
2. I asked you to tell me what questions you had asked.
3. You clarified that you had NOT asked me any questions.
4. Thus, I stated that I was justified in not "answering," because there was nothing to answer.
Now you are again insisting that I'm supposed to answer a question that was never asked.
If you wish to ask me a question, feel free to do so, but your behavior is trolling at this point. I will ignore you if you keep repeating yourself. This is just a courtesy to let you know why.
EriK_tg: Doubt no longer. Read any one of the gospels. Jesus states several times that He was equal to God, which led the Jewish elders to try to stone Him for blasphemy, because as they saw it, He claimed to be God (it would be strange if He was not doing so, because then how could they believe that that's what He did?). Moreover, people worship Him, and only God can receive worship, but Jesus accepts worship. This is in contrast to the angels, who assertively deny worship aimed at them.
Cheers
Cheers
You're really a Throwback to the Dark Ages!EriK_tg: Last time I'm responding to you, child. I'll lay it out very plainly for you.
1. You demanded that I answer your questions.
2. I asked you to tell me what questions you had asked.
3. You clarified that you had NOT asked me any questions.
4. Thus, I stated that I was justified in not "answering," because there was nothing to answer.
Now you are again insisting that I'm supposed to answer a question that was never asked.
If you wish to ask me a question, feel free to do so, but your behavior is trolling at this point. I will ignore you if you keep repeating yourself. This is just a courtesy to let you know why.
1. You demanded that I answer your questions.
2. I asked you to tell me what questions you had asked.
3. You clarified that you had NOT asked me any questions.
4. Thus, I stated that I was justified in not "answering," because there was nothing to answer.
Now you are again insisting that I'm supposed to answer a question that was never asked.
If you wish to ask me a question, feel free to do so, but your behavior is trolling at this point. I will ignore you if you keep repeating yourself. This is just a courtesy to let you know why.
Is everyone deemed a troll who do not agree with you?
EriK_tg: Indeed. Nonbelievers have no rational basis for...well, rationality.
EriK_tg: Doubt no longer. Read any one of the gospels. Jesus states several times that He was equal to God, .......
Again.......using fiction as a reference. If there was even ONE SINGLE instance of Jesus(if real) saying ANYTHING then somebody w/ some sense MAY consider it.
And don't give me Josephus....even that is questionable.
Amity: Is everyone deemed a troll who do not agree with you?
Nope, people who
a. Spam links and don't address other posters (except to post inflammatory remarks, but they still won't be addressing arguments)
b. Make up imaginary rules that they insist I follow and become increasingly offensive, aggressive, and repetitive when I fail to follow their rules.
c. Ignore my arguments and simply express their negative emotions relative to me.
d. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem. Complex question, question-begging epithets, etc.
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
EriK_tg:
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
Why not FACTUAL?
NCC1968: Again.......using fiction as a reference. If there was even ONE SINGLE instance of Jesus(if real) saying ANYTHING then somebody w/ some sense MAY consider it.
And don't give me Josephus....even that is questionable.
And don't give me Josephus....even that is questionable.
See, in my description about trolls to Amity, the one about making up imaginary rules that you insist I follow. Troll behavior. Stop it.
EriK_tg: Nope, people who
a. Spam links and don't address other posters (except to post inflammatory remarks, but they still won't be addressing arguments)
b. Make up imaginary rules that they insist I follow and become increasingly offensive, aggressive, and repetitive when I fail to follow their rules.
c. Ignore my arguments and simply express their negative emotions relative to me.
d. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem. Complex question, question-begging epithets, etc.
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
a. Spam links and don't address other posters (except to post inflammatory remarks, but they still won't be addressing arguments)
b. Make up imaginary rules that they insist I follow and become increasingly offensive, aggressive, and repetitive when I fail to follow their rules.
c. Ignore my arguments and simply express their negative emotions relative to me.
d. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem. Complex question, question-begging epithets, etc.
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
Do you realise that the highlighted also resembles you!
Ironic no?
EriK_tg: Nope, people who
a. Spam links and don't address other posters (except to post inflammatory remarks, but they still won't be addressing arguments)
b. Make up imaginary rules that they insist I follow and become increasingly offensive, aggressive, and repetitive when I fail to follow their rules.
c. Ignore my arguments and simply express their negative emotions relative to me.
d. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem. Complex question, question-begging epithets, etc.
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
a. Spam links and don't address other posters (except to post inflammatory remarks, but they still won't be addressing arguments)
b. Make up imaginary rules that they insist I follow and become increasingly offensive, aggressive, and repetitive when I fail to follow their rules.
c. Ignore my arguments and simply express their negative emotions relative to me.
d. Ad hominem, ad hominem, ad hominem. Complex question, question-begging epithets, etc.
That's a troll. That's kidatheart, incidentally. And StressFree. SerpentaManon seems to be getting there. At least she posts stuff that I can theoretically respond to, but I get the feeling she doesn't want a response (another form of trolling).
So you even make up your own definition of a troll.
You really do like to alienate yourself on here, don't you.
But like I said earlier, that's nothing new from you.
More Threads
Icebergs Still Around
Salami, Salami, Baloney
rarotonga
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Nature
Reality Check
What I Lack In Vocabulary
1830's Music
everything is changing
How far is too far?
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
because it is a public forum, and i am entitled to post where i like.
I see you have lost your good manners as well? Now you purely trying to offend all.
I will leave you to it xxxx
Best wishes.