Jeffrey Epstein list
The first two batches of unsealed Jeffrey Epstein court documents reveal a number of high-profile individuals whose names appeared multiple times in various materials, including footnotes.Among them are two former US presidents – Donald Trump and Bill Clinton – and Prince Andrew, all three of whom have been pictured with and known to associate with the disgraced financier in the past.
Other names include lawyer Alan Dershowitz and magician David Copperfield.
However, being identified through the court documents does not necessarily mean that the individual was involved in or aware of any wrongdoing by Epstein.
Unsurprisingly, Epstein’s partner in crime Ghislaine Maxwell is one of the names that appears the most - 208 times in the first tranche.
The British socialite’s name appears in full 20 times, due to the files being part of a 2015 US defamation case by Virginia Giuffre against her. The name “Maxwell” appears 849 times, though this is some times in reference to legal matters and footnotes.
References to Maxwell were made throughout the documents, with various other witnesses being asked about her involvement with Epstein in their separate testimonies.
The second tranche of documents contained the name Maxwell 352 times.
She is currently serving 20 years in prison, having been convicted sex-trafficking underage girls in June 2022.
Prince Andrew - 110
Prince Andrew has been named 110 times accross both sets of documents.
Bill Clinton - 83
Clinton’s name is mentioned 83 times in the documents so far. Both he and Andrew are known to have been associated with Epstein previously.
Part of the testimony from Ms Sjoberg alleges that Epstein once told her that Clinton “likes them young” – referring to girls.
Donald Trump - 4
Clinton is not the only former commander-in-chief to appear in the documents. Donald Trump was named in the first batch, though only four times.
In part of Ms Sjoberg’s testimony, she claimed Epstein once “called up” the former president and visited one of his casinos after his private plane was diverted to Atlantic City in New Jersey.
Elsewhere, Ms Sjoberg was asked if she ever gave Mr Trump a massage, to which she replied “no”.
Magician David Copperfield - 6
US magician David Copperfield was named six times in the first set of documents, having reportedly had dined with Epstein on occasion.
Copperfield’s relationship with Epstein has previously been noted, including in a 2019 article from The New York Times, which described Maxwell’s role in acquiring young girls for the disgraced financier.
Hollywood stars
Other big Hollywood names have also appeared in the documents, though mostly just once or twice during Ms Sjoberg’s testimony.
She is asked about meeting guests at Epstein’s residence, including Star Wars creator George Lucas – who is mentioned once – and actor Kevin Spacey, who is mentioned twice. Ms Sjoberg says she does not remember meeting either man.
She also does not remember meeting British supermodel Naomi Campbell, who is named once in the documents.
Late King of Pop Michael Jackson is also named twice, after Ms Sjolberg is asked if she met “anybody famous” while with Epstein. She said she did meet Jackson.
Alan Dershowitz - 166
Epstein’s lawyer Alan Dershowitz is also named over 100 times, though in some places this is simply in footnotes referring to legal matters.
Sharon Churcher - 324
British journalist Sharon Churcher has made over 300 appearances in the second tranche of documents, released on Thursday.
Ms Churcher was the sole source of regarding the original Epstein story from Giuffre, according to the response filing. Maxwell also claimed she helped Virginia Giuffre “concoct” s*xual assault allegations against the Duke of York.
Link: www. Independent.co.uk
Comments (52)
Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Jmo.
Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Jmo.
Out of context, the mention of names means very little.
However, Trump has been found liable for s*xual abuse and Judge Kaplan affirmed that he did indeed rape and defame E. Jean Carroll in a civil suit against him. In this context, it's not beyond the realms of possibility, or probability that Trump has little regard towards s*xual consent. If he (likely) did have knowledge of Epstein's proclivities and activities, he certainly wasn't in the business of protecting these minors from other rapists.
So why are you attempting to protect the rapist Trump?
Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Trump was not accused for anything, but only mentioned 4 times:
“Ms Sjoberg was asked if she ever gave Mr Trump a massage, to which she replied “no”.”
Out of context, the mention of names means very little.
However, Trump has been found liable for s*xual abuse and Judge Kaplan affirmed that he did indeed rape and defame E. Jean Carroll in a civil suit against him. In this context, it's not beyond the realms of possibility, or probability that Trump has little regard towards s*xual consent. If he (likely) did have knowledge of Epstein's proclivities and activities, he certainly wasn't in the business of protecting these minors from other rapists.
So why are you attempting to protect the rapist Trump?
Out of context, the mention of names means very little.
However, Trump has been found liable for s*xual abuse and Judge Kaplan affirmed that he did indeed rape and defame E. Jean Carroll in a civil suit against him. In this context, it's not beyond the realms of possibility, or probability that Trump has little regard towards s*xual consent. If he (likely) did have knowledge of Epstein's proclivities and activities, he certainly wasn't in the business of protecting these minors from other rapists.
So why are you attempting to protect the rapist Trump?
Get a Grip Miss Gripper!
Get a Grip Miss Gripper!
Have a look at just about any of its comments and you will find a question, rhetorical or otherwise.
Get a Grip Miss Gripper!
Out of context, the mention of names means very little.
However, Trump has been found liable for s*xual abuse and Judge Kaplan affirmed that he did indeed rape and defame E. Jean Carroll in a civil suit against him. In this context, it's not beyond the realms of possibility, or probability that Trump has little regard towards s*xual consent. If he (likely) did have knowledge of Epstein's proclivities and activities, he certainly wasn't in the business of protecting these minors from other rapists.
So why are you attempting to protect the rapist Trump?
I would have thought that America was too advanced a place for this to happen but I was wrong.
I would have thought that America was too advanced a place for this to happen but I was wrong.
Not true. He is innocent. 100% innocent.
Regardless of what Miss Gripper claim.
Now, he is popular. He may even win again just like he did
in the last two elections but he is a threat to them.
Don't ask how, you should know by now.
So they do the s*xual-assult crap they also pulled on
Assange/Kavanaugh/RusselBrand and more.
That's it. He is innocent.
Now listen to this wise woman called Tulsi Gabbard.
She should know what she is talking about.
It's not about Epstein or his island but about
her experience Being A Democrat.
Fundamentaly it's connected to the blog after all-
if topic is who is the good guys vs the less so.
Two and a half minutes (short vid)
I'm trying to understand where you get your info from regarding Trump.
I gather you actually worship him for whatever reason but if you look at the polls across all the States of the U.S. you can clearly see that his popularity shrank in almost every State after his election.
Whether he makes it back to the White House is debatable but if he does, by golly things will have to change dramatically or the U.S. will end up an autocracy.
Jack has a habit of doing this type of thing that's one of the reasons I completely ignore its idiotic questions. Hopefully the OP will delete unwanted biased comments?
Problem is- I predict they will steal it again.
And the rhinos will let them, again.
Ooooppss happened to turn a blind eye- but mind you,
only in 5 out of 50 states
The other 45 states: results in at 9pm, at least way before midnight.
Anyone with a brain will find that fishy.
Problem is- I predict they will steal it again.
And the rhinos will let them, again.
Ooooppss happened to turn a blind eye- but mind you,
only in 5 out of 50 states
The other 45 states: results in at 9pm, at least way before midnight.
Anyone with a brain will find that fishy.
There is a chance that if you had seen what I have seen
(yes online, most is from youtube)
That you would also start to wonder.
Ok...
My first interest for Trump was in 2015 when I suddenly understood that he might actually beat Hillary! Then on the morning of the day after I asked a collegue of mine at work "did she win" and he said...no, Trump did! And I was like astonished! I was right!
Then with no expectations I started following the developemenet to see what this would mean. Would he bring about real change? Call me a revolutionary but I like real change! Let's make the world better, must be a reason they wanted him. And Hillary don't seem to good to me so let's go! But... nooo... nonono...
So the first strange thing I noticed was the hate on him.. in media. So after that I been paying attention very closely, cos I knew he could mean a new way, right...
And here we are now, 7 years later.
Now I know a lot more than before he appered on the stage.
In 2014 I had hardly had any clue who he was, a hotel owner from the big apple(?!)
3 years since the second worst crime of the century.
There is a chance that if you had seen what I have seen
(yes online, most is from youtube)
That you would also start to wonder.
Ok...
My first interest for Trump was in 2015 when I suddenly understood that he might actually beat Hillary! Then on the morning of the day after I asked a collegue of mine at work "did she win" and he said...no, Trump did! And I was like astonished! I was right!
Then with no expectations I started following the developemenet to see what this would mean. Would he bring about real change? Call me a revolutionary but I like real change! Let's make the world better, must be a reason they wanted him. And Hillary don't seem to good to me so let's go! But... nooo... nonono...
So the first strange thing I noticed was the hate on him.. in media. So after that I been paying attention very closely, cos I knew he could mean a new way, right...
And here we are now, 7 years later.
Now I know a lot more than before he appered on the stage.
In 2014 I had hardly had any clue who he was, a hotel owner from the big apple(?!)
That is why your cuppa here seems so nasty to you, cos you don't know why he is biting back. I do.
Rambo said it like this "you did first blood".
Anyhows, your reason to dislike him is very common: people hate such figures from their own life:
the narco dominant bully-ish type - but truth is- this is his enemies presentation.
out
Megyn Kelly has suggested that people may soon hear from late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein “directly” amid the disclosure of hundreds of pages of documents related to him. On the Megyn Kelly show, she said, “We’re not done with Jeffrey Epstein. I can tell you that for a fact. I can’t tell you how I know, but I can tell you for a fact we’re gonna hear a lot more about Jeffrey Epstein in the coming year, and you may be even hearing from him directly. More on that as I’m allowed to tell you.”
Ruslana Korshunova was just 18 when she was a passenger on the since-deceased p*dophile’s so-called Lolita Express on June 7, 2006, flight logs show.
Korshunova’s trip to Epstein’s Island was just weeks before the moneyman was arrested in 2006 and later convicted of sex with underage girls, and just two years before she jumped to her death.
With his selfish, boyish attitude he can put a lot on an Altar of -Make America Great again-, even his own people.
Countries and Civilisations are not the same as they were 2 years ago. They will fight back.
With my respect
You guys think with your "emotions". So, we can easily conclude that none of you understand
how Trump could stop the war in ukraine, or hinder Kim in threatening the near him world with nukes or basically any other world arena situation. Trump starting ww3 is as comical an adea as Trump peeing on hookers in Moscow. He shot 55 tommahawks on an airfield against Assad back when, in my view only to upease his own war hawks. Today he would probably know better. Luckily only a few lost their lives in that attack.
Fantaziya, you who thought me what it was like to be hunted down by Azov in east ukraine, should know better. But it is what it is.
You guys think with your "emotions". So, we can easily conclude that none of you understand
how Trump could stop the war in ukraine, or hinder Kim in threatening the near him world with nukes or basically any other world arena situation. Trump starting ww3 is as comical an adea as Trump peeing on hookers in Moscow. He shot 55 tommahawks on an airfield against Assad back when, in my view only to upease his own war hawks. Today he would probably know better. Luckily only a few lost their lives in that attack.
Fantaziya, you who thought me what it was like to be hunted down by Azov in east ukraine, should know better. But it is what it is.
I do not trust no one.
They will tell us everything what we want to hear during election. And after they will win, all promises goes in the wastebasket. Only one country can finnish war in Ukraine. And you know this.
So, for Victory
p.s. I am sorry Grapewine for hijacking your blog. No more.
Trump is named in the documents four times. However, there is no indication that he has committed any wrongdoing and he has not been charged with involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Trump was not accused for anything, but only mentioned 4 times:
“Ms Sjoberg was asked if she ever gave Mr Trump a massage, to which she replied “no”.”
You guys think with your "emotions". So, we can easily conclude that none of you understand
how Trump could stop the war in ukraine, or hinder Kim in threatening the near him world with nukes or basically any other world arena situation. Trump starting ww3 is as comical an adea as Trump peeing on hookers in Moscow. He shot 55 tommahawks on an airfield against Assad back when, in my view only to upease his own war hawks. Today he would probably know better. Luckily only a few lost their lives in that attack.
Fantaziya, you who thought me what it was like to be hunted down by Azov in east ukraine, should know better. But it is what it is.
Wow just wow
With his selfish, boyish attitude he can put a lot on an Altar of -Make America Great again-, even his own people.
Countries and Civilisations are not the same as they were 2 years ago. They will fight back.
With my respect
The Obama/Biden administration dropped even more bombs than the George W Bush administration did! ISIS was rampant, a violent overthrow of government in Ukraine was carried out with aid from the U.S. State Department and CIA (this was the real beginning point of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine). And yet despite inheriting all this, Trump managed to keep a lid on things and was even helping facilitate peace deals.
Then a short few years under Biden and we have a full-scale war between Russia and Ukraine, and a situation between Israel and Palestine that threatens to spread throughout the region. China and Taiwan seems to be a situation that could kick off any time too. European economies are in turmoil (Germany in particular). We're at a very precarious point.
People love to focus on Trump's personality rather than focus on his policy and overall effectiveness as a leader. The truth is his policies were really good and his leadership effective, despite the non-stop attempts of his adversaries to undermine and frame him throughout his presidency. The man has extraordinary resilience. Can his personality be disagreeable? Yes, but so what? How he makes YOU feel personally is not the most important thing. Not even close. Many of the most consequential leaders throughout history have been disagreeable in nature (Winston Churchill is one who immediately comes to mind). Results are what matters.
The world needs Trump back. Everything is falling apart since the stolen 2020 election. America is now laughed at abroad and no longer taken seriously, while at home the Biden Administration and Democrats at large are doing everything to convince people that they are authoritarians who won't hesitate to use whatever power they have to crush their political opposition. It's depraved and dangerous how they're acting. The world needs a Great Reversal, before it's too late.
Get a Grip Miss Gripper!
Stop the Con Mr. Conrad!
Remember this from New York Magazine 2002?
Given his own s*xual disposition (Trump raped E.Jean Carroll just a few years earlier) it's clear he either didn't see anything wrong with s*xual abuse, or if he did, that it didn't matter because he and Epstein could get away their individual s*xual aberrancies.
It's all out there in the public eye, we can all see it, and yet people still support and make excuses for Epstein's buddy, Trump the foul-mouthed, s*xual braggart, E. Jean Carroll rapist.
I would have thought that America was too advanced a place for this to happen but I was wrong.
I hear what you're saying, but it still doesn't make sense given Trump is blatantly a part of the elite and elitist. He was born into wealth and privilege, he bangs on about his wealth and privilege, he gave tax breaks to the wealthy and privileged. He bad-mouthed, bullied and abused the people of Scotland whom he deemed too lowly to be worthy of respect when their lives got in the way of his elitist golf course.
Personally, I think his appeal is nothing more than his entertainment value. His style allows ordinary people to feel they are excited by, and included in politics, precisely because he doesn't do politics. He just presents The Trump Show.
And who the hell is Epstein and why this nobody had such powerful connections?
Overlooking the importance of this just like they overlooked the actions of Biden's son, filmed drugged with Ukrainian hookers who had guns to their heads.
Maxwell, Epstein, Dershowitz... What a nice Jewish team...
The groomer, the dealer and the protector...
I hear what you're saying, but it still doesn't make sense given Trump is blatantly a part of the elite and elitist. He was born into wealth and privilege, he bangs on about his wealth and privilege, he gave tax breaks to the wealthy and privileged. He bad-mouthed, bullied and abused the people of Scotland whom he deemed too lowly to be worthy of respect when their lives got in the way of his elitist golf course.
Personally, I think his appeal is nothing more than his entertainment value. His style allows ordinary people to feel they are excited by, and included in politics, precisely because he doesn't do politics. He just presents The Trump Show.
Stop the Con Mr. Conrad!
Remember this from New York Magazine 2002?
My point was that Trump knew of Epstein's s*xual proclivities, but did nothing to protect minors from being sexually abused by him.
Given his own s*xual disposition (Trump raped E.Jean Carroll just a few years earlier) it's clear he either didn't see anything wrong with s*xual abuse, or if he did, that it didn't matter because he and Epstein could get away their individual s*xual aberrancies.
I didn't say they had the same s*xual deviance, but that they were both sexually abusive and likely knew that about each other (see above). It's not like there's no evidence of 'locker room talk' (see above), is there?
It's all out there in the public eye, we can all see it, and yet people still support and make excuses for Epstein's buddy, Trump the foul-mouthed, s*xual braggart, E. Jean Carroll rapist.
Actually, you using that kind of language to describe those offences speaks volumes about how little you understand about child s*xual abuse and child sex trafficking, or any s*xual abuse for that matter.
That would explain your inability to understand what I wrote.
I disagree on any conspiracy theory that would claim Putin has a hold on Trump.
They have equal respect for each other as far as I can see,
and further more- that friendship makes the world safer- not less so.
If it was not for the war mongers in D.C Trump would easily stop the war in Ukraine,
provided he win.
But since that is not the case it will be a battle, internally.
You are the blind one. You seem to swallow whatever msm feed you.
They want you to fear Putin. And Xi Jinping too.
Why is that? To hide the fact that the roles are now reversed mister!
They are the good guys compared to us! We are the bad guys.
Except Trump that is. And a few other good men.
Put that on your pipe.