Most Liked News Blogs (3,096)

From Clint - "Too much funny business" on that side of the aisle.

He's now supporting Mike Bloomberg for president.
So, are you switching too, or "do ya feel lucky punk ?"



In other news;

" Neil Young Calls Trump 'a Disgrace,' Says Sanders Will 'Make America Great Again' "

If you want praise - die.
If you want blame - marry.

Only place in America have high murder is city run by Democrats.

Today in The New Yorker;

By Robin Wright

.....

For your personal collection.
Distribute freely.
Or add to the collection if you like;

Earlier this week, the Conservative Borg mothership came in orbit around Earth. It was just a few days before Robert Mueller was to appear before the Special Counsel. As predicted, millions of sleeper cell started lighting up to submit blogs and make comments to existing blogs.
Talk about overloaded bandwidth... they had Mueller's testimony already summed up before the cameras started rolling.
Good work guys!!
The rumor mill was in full swing... Kellyann Conway dressed as the town crier was chasing reporters shouting "He's feeble minded"
Conservative (news) radio was saying it's a waste of time and taxpayer's money to listen to fake news.

At this point, your minds are already made up and I doubt that anything that Mueller said or did would would change your opinion.

NASA reported the mothership has left orbit and all systems are returning to normal.

So now they want you to let them DOUBLE DOWN on them. After all, why bother trying to come up with better ideas to earn votes when you can simply buy them with other peoples’ money?

That’s what the Democrat Party’s leading candidates for the 2020 presidential election have discovered.

“Medicare for all” at a cost of $85 TRILLION dollars?

That’s child’s play! That’s just for starters!

Forget about free “STUFF,” now they one upped their game into free “MONEY.”

Andrew Yang promises to give every American adult a “freedom dividend” of $1,000 a month… for doing NOTHING.

Corey Booker (a.k.a. Spartacus) promises to give a bank account with $1,000 in it to every child and put $2,000 more in it every year until they turn 18.

Not to be outdone, spooky moon child Marianne Williamson promises to give out $500 billion in reparations to black people.

The Democrat platform is a virtual FREE-FOR-ALL of who can promise to raise your taxes the most and give more of your money away to someone else.

But the most pathetic part of all is what led to this desperate strategy.

After five decades of pumping taxpayer money into poor minority communities, to the tune of more than $22 TRILLION DOLLARS, and trillions more into the college system which did nothing but raise tuitions, the Democrats have chosen a strategy that clearly admits that their socialist welfare state policies have been a catastrophic FAILURE. It has failed so badly, that here today, 50 years and $22 trillion later they are STILL saying that we need to pump even more money down the same rat-hole with no evidence of results.

After the biggest, longest redistribution of wealth in the history of mankind, they admit that the problems are WORSE THAN EVER.

The Democrat 2020 campaign is a clown car. But the funny is on us. They want to take YOUR money and shove it down the same hole all over again with nothing to show for it. Are you really stupid enough to buy this?

This morning in The Huffington Post;



I would suggest to Scaramucci, that Trump already turned against the USA, each time he continually lies to the American public, when he chose Russian help prior to the election, and when he sided with Putin over US intelligence, and when he obstructed justice many times.

I however agree, that not speaking out against evil, is itself evil.
I will continue to speak out against the evils of Trump, officially the WORST president in US history, until he is removed from office.

A federal judge in frank terms Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) against key members of the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks over hacked DNC documents, saying they "did not participate in any wrongdoing in obtaining the materials in the first place" and therefore bore no legal liability for disseminating the information.

The ruling came as Democrats increasingly have sought to tie the Trump team to illegal activity in Russia, in spite of former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's findings that the campaign in fact refused multiple offers by Russians to involve them in hacking and disinformation efforts.

President Trump, in a tweet late Tuesday, noted that the judge in the case, John Koeltl, was appointed by Bill Clinton. The president called Koeltl's decision "really big 'stuff'" and "yet another total & complete vindication and exoneration."

The DNC had asserted in court filings that the Trump team's meetings "with persons connected to the Russian government during the time that the Russian GRU agents were stealing the DNC's information" were "circumstantial evidence" that they were conspiring with the Russians to "steal and disseminate the DNC's materials."

The suit did not allege that the stolen materials were false or defamatory but rather sought to hold the Trump team and other defendants liable for the theft of the DNC's information under various Virginia and federal statutes, including the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, Wiretap Act, Stored Communications Act, Digital Millenium Copyright Act, and laws protecting trade secrets.

However, Judge Koeltl, sitting in the Southern District of New York, wrote in his 81-page opinion Tuesday that the DNC's argument was "entirely divorced" from the factual record in the case.

The DNC first filed its suit in April 2018, and the defendants responded that the First Amendment legally protected the dissemination of stolen materials.

"In short, the DNC raises a number of connections and communications between the defendants and with people loosely connected to the Russian Federation, but at no point does the DNC allege any facts ... to show that any of the defendants -- other than the Russian Federation -- participated in the theft of the DNC's information," Koeltl said.

"Nor does the DNC allege that the defendants ever agreed to help the Russian Federation steal the DNC's documents," he added.

The DNC claimed the defendants illegally compromised their trade secrets contained in some of the stolen documents -- including donor lists and strategies. But, the judge said, any such claim to trade secrecy was lost when the documents became public in the first place, and in any event, the newsworthiness of the matter trumped the trade secrecy issue.

"If Wikileaks could be held liable for publishing documents concerning the DNC's political financial and voter-engagement strategies simply because the DNC labels them 'secret' and trade secrets, then so could any newspaper or other media outlet," the judge wrote. That, he said, would elevate a privacy interest impermissibly over the First Amendment rights of people and media outlets to disseminate matters of "the highest public concern."

Koeltl went on to describe multiple hacking efforts directed by Russians at the DNC, in which Russians "hacked into the DNC's computers, penetrated its phone systems, and stole tens of thousands of documents."

But, even if the Russians had provided the hacked documents to the Trump team directly, the judge wrote, it would not be criminal for the campaign to then publish those documents, as long as they did not contribute to the hacking itself. Similarly, the judge said, it is not criminal to merely solicit or "welcome" stolen documents.

Continued in comments...