Is euthanasia an ethical act.??? (72)
sophiasummerNorthland, New Zealand112 Threads 6,528 Postsgalrads: Maybe see things in three dimensions as enlightened people will, and go straight, straight for the heart.......
------ This thread is Archived ------
4th dimension God?
------ This thread is Archived ------
sophiasummer: 4th dimension God?
maybe Valhalla, Nirvana, heaven, purgatory, hell, earth, wind, fire, water, love------ This thread is Archived ------
kidatheart: I don't think it should ever be endorsed by law, that would set a very bad precedent. Perhaps giving the state a legal means to eradicate the elderly, indigent, and ill.
It should always be up to the individual, and it should be in writing, of some description, of the individual that wants to end their life, for whatever reason. Failing the ability to do this under their own means, then someone either appointed to the, or their legal counsel, with any and every supporting measure should be made, and held, responsible for their decision.
I would never want anyone to ask for their own life to be taken by anyone, without knowing full well that others will ultimately be resposnsible, in one way oe another. I'd like to see the courts ease their responsibility in a number of ways, and also grant they dying their wish, in a dignified manner, that doesn't affect the living in a negative fashion.
It really should be up to the one that wants to end their life, for whatever reason. Others should have no legal means to interfere, let alone the courts. It really is an individual choice.
It should always be up to the individual, and it should be in writing, of some description, of the individual that wants to end their life, for whatever reason. Failing the ability to do this under their own means, then someone either appointed to the, or their legal counsel, with any and every supporting measure should be made, and held, responsible for their decision.
It really should be up to the one that wants to end their life, for whatever reason. Others should have no legal means to interfere, let alone the courts. It really is an individual choice.
I disagree that it should be up to the individual except when a person has a DNR prior to illness.
To suggest that someone should be allowed to end their own life "for whatever reason" isn't sound advice for that person. There are those who are depressed and say they want to die and will make an attempt to die but all they really want is to be out of the pain of their depression. Medication and therapy will help depression.
Euthanasia should be saved for those who are terminally ill not those who want to run away from life. The person who dies is freed of their emotional pain but family and friends will go on believing that their loved one didn't want them in their life anymore. Sometimes that is more painful then the loss of life for those left behind.
------ This thread is Archived ------
secretagent09: I disagree that it should be up to the individual except when a person has a DNR prior to illness.
To suggest that someone should be allowed to end their own life "for whatever reason" isn't sound advice for that person. There are those who are depressed and say they want to die and will make an attempt to die but all they really want is to be out of the pain of their depression. Medication and therapy will help depression.
Euthanasia should be saved for those who are terminally ill not those who want to run away from life. The person who dies is freed of their emotional pain but family and friends will go on believing that their loved one didn't want them in their life anymore. Sometimes that is more painful then the loss of life for those left behind.
To suggest that someone should be allowed to end their own life "for whatever reason" isn't sound advice for that person. There are those who are depressed and say they want to die and will make an attempt to die but all they really want is to be out of the pain of their depression. Medication and therapy will help depression.
Euthanasia should be saved for those who are terminally ill not those who want to run away from life. The person who dies is freed of their emotional pain but family and friends will go on believing that their loved one didn't want them in their life anymore. Sometimes that is more painful then the loss of life for those left behind.
They who knows shall wager their sins of life.
------ This thread is Archived ------
sophiasummer: So tell me,
Where shall I go?
To the left, where nothing's right? Or
to right, where nothings' left
:
Where shall I go?
To the left, where nothing's right? Or
to right, where nothings' left
:
You owe a choice to yourself, capable on deciding your fate,
as well to your friends and relatives,if you have the
the legal capacity to decide for any of them.-
------ This thread is Archived ------
galrads: We got to be reading different bibles.
Bloody Greeks wrote 2 bibles.
One for the PRO and
One for CONS,
------ This thread is Archived ------
secretagent09: I disagree that it should be up to the individual except when a person has a DNR prior to illness.
To suggest that someone should be allowed to end their own life "for whatever reason" isn't sound advice for that person. There are those who are depressed and say they want to die and will make an attempt to die but all they really want is to be out of the pain of their depression. Medication and therapy will help depression.
Euthanasia should be saved for those who are terminally ill not those who want to run away from life. The person who dies is freed of their emotional pain but family and friends will go on believing that their loved one didn't want them in their life anymore. Sometimes that is more painful then the loss of life for those left behind.
To suggest that someone should be allowed to end their own life "for whatever reason" isn't sound advice for that person. There are those who are depressed and say they want to die and will make an attempt to die but all they really want is to be out of the pain of their depression. Medication and therapy will help depression.
Euthanasia should be saved for those who are terminally ill not those who want to run away from life. The person who dies is freed of their emotional pain but family and friends will go on believing that their loved one didn't want them in their life anymore. Sometimes that is more painful then the loss of life for those left behind.
Good post.
------ This thread is Archived ------
chris27292729: You owe a choice to yourself, capable on deciding your fate,
as well to your friends and relatives,if you have the
the legal capacity to decide for any of them.-
as well to your friends and relatives,if you have the
the legal capacity to decide for any of them.-
Owe is not a choice , like to steal is to circumstances.
------ This thread is Archived ------
stringman: king James.
King James??The one who ordered the bible to be translate in such way,
to suit his believes.????
------ This thread is Archived ------
sophiasummer: So tell me,
Where shall I go?
To the left, where nothing's right? Or
to right, where nothings' left
:
I'm going to put this on my fridge! In spite of the irony, it is one of the truest things I've heard in a long time.Where shall I go?
To the left, where nothing's right? Or
to right, where nothings' left
:
------ This thread is Archived ------
rohaan: I'm going to put this on my fridge! In spite of the irony, it is one of the truest things I've heard in a long time.
So. what is it for you????
Ethical or Non???
------ This thread is Archived ------
2intrigued: Well said and I totally agree with this.
Me too
------ This thread is Archived ------
serene56: Me too
Well well well, Serene, god I want you!
------ This thread is Archived ------
chris27292729: So. what is it for you????
Ethical or Non???
This is possibly one of the wisest questions I have ever been asked. There are so many variables, and having worked in the health care field for many, many years, I must say that I just don't know. In one critical case, one might argue to a reasonable sense of pathetic mercy. Another case might only seem that way, and the outcome possibly be different. Anyone having worked in Hospice knows that these patients sometimes beat the odds and actually go home and are productive members of society again. How disastrous would it be if they were euthanized only because it seemed appropriate? The chance for collusion is certainly in the mix, as well. What if anxious heirs just don't want to wait for Grandpa or Auntie to go, and enlist the help of professionals? (I believe there is every chance of this happening). Do we want to open up a legal reign of terror? The chances of misuse are rampant, and for that reason, I would have to say, overall, unethical. JMOEthical or Non???
------ This thread is Archived ------
chris27292729: Bloody Greeks wrote 2 bibles.
One for the PRO and
One for CONS,
One for the PRO and
One for CONS,
yep,them Greeks bearing Gifts again!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Switzerland has legislatively permitted assisted suicide since 1942. For example, lethal drugs may be prescribed as long as the recipient takes an active role in the drug administration. Euthanasia (such as administering a lethal injection) is not legal and the law does require a physician to be involved.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rohaan: This is possibly one of the wisest questions I have ever been asked. There are so many variables, and having worked in the health care field for many, many years, I must say that I just don't know. In one critical case, one might argue to a reasonable sense of pathetic mercy. Another case might only seem that way, and the outcome possibly be different. Anyone having worked in Hospice knows that these patients sometimes beat the odds and actually go home and are productive members of society again. How disastrous would it be if they were euthanized only because it seemed appropriate? The chance for collusion is certainly in the mix, as well. What if anxious heirs just don't want to wait for Grandpa or Auntie to go, and enlist the help of professionals? (I believe there is every chance of this happening). Do we want to open up a legal reign of terror? The chances of misuse are rampant, and for that reason, I would have to say, overall, unethical. JMO
Thanks. Analytical and to the point.
------ This thread is Archived ------
rohaan: This is possibly one of the wisest questions I have ever been asked. There are so many variables, and having worked in the health care field for many, many years, I must say that I just don't know. In one critical case, one might argue to a reasonable sense of pathetic mercy. Another case might only seem that way, and the outcome possibly be different. Anyone having worked in Hospice knows that these patients sometimes beat the odds and actually go home and are productive members of society again. How disastrous would it be if they were euthanized only because it seemed appropriate? The chance for collusion is certainly in the mix, as well. What if anxious heirs just don't want to wait for Grandpa or Auntie to go, and enlist the help of professionals? (I believe there is every chance of this happening). Do we want to open up a legal reign of terror? The chances of misuse are rampant, and for that reason, I would have to say, overall, unethical. JMO
This is the very reason that this should be discussed, to avoid something of that nature. It has to be up to the individual, not anyone else, to decide whether or not their life will be ended by someone else, or with the help of someone else. It should never be up to anyone else, let alone government or medical staff.
I've been through this with family and friends more than once, and if it would have been legal in the past, I get the feeling at least one or two would have chosen this path. Once cancer has spread, being told you're terminal, it's only a matter of time, and knowing this, and knowing what "treatment' you'll face, maybe it's a better option.
Life is precious, but when you know you're going to die, you should be able to choose to die with dignity, and in a manner that causes the least amount of suffering.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kidatheart:
Life is precious, but when you know you're going to die, you should be able to choose to die with dignity, and in a manner that causes the least amount of suffering.
Life is precious, but when you know you're going to die, you should be able to choose to die with dignity, and in a manner that causes the least amount of suffering.
I concur.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
wanting beyond need
The weird and the random facts around the world
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
s*xual skills
Democrats destroyed America
Kultur-multur
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
your favorite topic?
men's perspective towards women
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Related Forums
- wanting beyond need
- The weird and the random facts around the world
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- s*xual skills
- Democrats destroyed America
- Kultur-multur
- Would you hire this guy - for any job?
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- your favorite topic?
- men's perspective towards women