do you believe isreal should have attacked Gaza in operation cast lead (831)
online today!online today!Conrad73Zurich, Switzerland204 Threads 6 Polls 59,471 Postsgilbertpaul: Alberttheghost, my definition is, the Military. The IDF is responsible for murdering palestinians on a massive scale. They don't care if their women or children because in their religious book, the talmud it permits the killing of anyone who is not jewish. ================================================================= This evil book of the writings and teachings of different Rabbi's down through the ages is a truly evil satanic book. It calls anyone not a jew a goyim which means cattle. We are nothing more then sheep ready for the slaughter. In the Talmud it says, " Kill even the best of the goyim." It says, " it is permissible to rob and steal from the goyim " I could go on and on but this should suffice. ================================================================= And so the Israeli military being led by Talmudic Rabbi's have no trouble destroying Palestinians because they are taught to do so. Thus you have the spread of true military terrorism perpetrated against these helpless people in the middle east. And we do not get this news because American news is run and controlled by zionists here.
gilbertpaul: Alberttheghost, my definition is, the Military. The IDF is responsible for murdering palestinians on a massive scale. They don't care if their women or children because in their religious book, the talmud it permits the killing of anyone who is not jewish. ================================================================= This evil book of the writings and teachings of different Rabbi's down through the ages is a truly evil satanic book. It calls anyone not a jew a goyim which means cattle. We are nothing more then sheep ready for the slaughter. In the Talmud it says, " Kill even the best of the goyim." It says, " it is permissible to rob and steal from the goyim " I could go on and on but this should suffice. ================================================================= And so the Israeli military being led by Talmudic Rabbi's have no trouble destroying Palestinians because they are taught to do so. Thus you have the spread of true military terrorism perpetrated against these helpless people in the middle east. And we do not get this news because American news is run and controlled by zionists here.
Why ain't I surprised?Welcome to the Site,SB!
gilbertpaul: Alberttheghost, my definition is, the Military. The IDF is responsible for murdering palestinians on a massive scale. They don't care if their women or children because in their religious book, the talmud it permits the killing of anyone who is not jewish. ================================================================= This evil book of the writings and teachings of different Rabbi's down through the ages is a truly evil satanic book. It calls anyone not a jew a goyim which means cattle. We are nothing more then sheep ready for the slaughter. In the Talmud it says, " Kill even the best of the goyim." It says, " it is permissible to rob and steal from the goyim " I could go on and on but this should suffice. ================================================================= And so the Israeli military being led by Talmudic Rabbi's have no trouble destroying Palestinians because they are taught to do so. Thus you have the spread of true military terrorism perpetrated against these helpless people in the middle east. And we do not get this news because American news is run and controlled by zionists here.
I would sure appreciate it, if you would post references to where I can find what you say, is in the Talmud; will you please do that for me?
.
Can any one tell me when the term used to refer to a grouping of people changed from Israelite to Israeli. How did that evolve?
gleneagle: Can any one tell me when the term used to refer to a grouping of people changed from Israelite to Israeli. How did that evolve?
Conrad73: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeliteshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli
I know how to google wiki and had already and figured that out all on my own but a defination is inadequate. I thought that maybe the "Lion of Zion" or his fellow apostles would enlighten me with their answers to my specific question.
gleneagle: I know how to google wiki and had already and figured that out all on my own but a defination is inadequate. I thought that maybe the "Lion of Zion" or his fellow apostles would enlighten me with their answers to my specific question.
Conrad73: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r5JHGi0awgc
This site is full of comedians-you funny guy
isnt that THE TRUTH
LucieLynn: By the way....It is spelled Israel and not Isreal. And it is pronounced Israaaa-el. Thanks.
ITS ABOUT SPELLING IS IT
who cares ............
Albertaghost:
Strange, the media is markedly anti Israel.
Strange, the media is markedly anti Israel.
Will you please name your source(s) for this statement?
.
anonymous1: Will you please name your source(s) for this statement?.
proof of the pudding is in the eating!Conrad73: proof of the pudding is in the eating!
Come on, please give me more than a cliche'.
I asked both sides for sources; I'm not accepting cliche's from either side.
.
tomcatwarne: I really don't understand why all these political discussions take place on a dating site, it seems to get hijacked often for political speeches and arguments, perhaps it's a cheap way for any side to forward it's political point of view
Current Events & Politics
tomcatwarne: I really don't understand why all these political discussions take place on a dating site, it seems to get hijacked often for political speeches and arguments, perhaps it's a cheap way for any side to forward it's political point of view
I don't understand why people try to hijack political threads; to complain about people discussing poitics.
If you practice with your mouse a little bit more, you never have to see people discussing politics in these threads again.
.
tomcatwarne: I really don't understand why all these political discussions take place on a dating site, it seems to get hijacked often for political speeches and arguments, perhaps it's a cheap way for any side to forward it's political point of view
If you are not interested in politics then steer clear of the political threads. One day you will fall off that fence you have been sitting on for so long.
tomcatwarne: I really don't understand why all these political discussions take place on a dating site, it seems to get hijacked often for political speeches and arguments, perhaps it's a cheap way for any side to forward it's political point of view
The reverse question is....Why do all these people try to meet and date on a political site of hack and attack?ttom500: This is likely the place to post it. But hey I am always outside of the box.
The American hiker Sarah Shourd is telling her story of the 410 day in Iran. Some is not pretty.
Such as a 5 x 10 foot cell. Complete isolation for long periods of time.
The American hiker Sarah Shourd is telling her story of the 410 day in Iran. Some is not pretty.
Such as a 5 x 10 foot cell. Complete isolation for long periods of time.
A 5 x 10 foot cell, is much larger than the isolation cells in the L.A. County Jail.
.
ttom500: Am sorry how do you have one of the 'worlds largest Armies'...when you have 5.5m people in your country? Israel......5.5m population. China has a larger Army than all of Israel combined with 14m in uniform.
No...what you are seeing....is a small Army frequently being used. So it get a lot of media attention. Why is the Israeli army so frequently used?
Maybe because mortars/rockets/missiles are frequently launched from Gaza.
No...what you are seeing....is a small Army frequently being used. So it get a lot of media attention. Why is the Israeli army so frequently used?
Maybe because mortars/rockets/missiles are frequently launched from Gaza.
ISARIEL AND CHINA IS THAT OF APPLES AND ORANGES WHAT IS POPULATION OF CHINA AND LAND BASE NO COMPARISON
aspen12: ISARIEL AND CHINA IS THAT OF APPLES AND ORANGES WHAT IS POPULATION OF CHINA AND LAND BASE NO COMPARISON
BAK TO YOU 
INTELLIGENT RIGHT
INTELLIGENT RIGHT
anonymous1: I gave part my definition of a terrorist, when I said, anybody who uses a child as a human shield is a war criminal, and a terrorist; and, should be put to death.
I'm still trying to pin you down for your widely accepted definition of terrorism. This is certainty not it as the 911 hijackers were terrorists yet never used a child as a human shield so please elaborate'
anonymous1:
I can't understand such bigotry.
I can't understand such bigotry.
No bigotry at all. Hamas uses human shields in Gaza to fend off Israeli troops and, Israeli troops have been caught using same to fend off Hamas fighters. It is a war crime, not terrorism as Israeli troops do not commit random violence with the sole purpose of creating terror to inflict a political change. I stated that if Hamas took children hostage and used them as human shields within Israel (as they certainly could not take Israeli children hostage in Gaza as there are none) then that would be considered terrorism. Similarly, if there were a terrorist Israeli group who infiltrated Gaza and took Palestinian children hostage and used them as human shields while they committed random acts of violence to inflict a political change then that would also be considered terrorism but, as we both know, that does not happen on either side hence, it is a war crime in this particular instance(s) not terrorism.
anonymous1: It's kinda' the way (IN HIS MIND) the definition of terrorism can change, depending on where it happens, and who does it.
Actually I only go by the definition that encompasses the one I gave in the OP of the terrorism thread. For an act of terrorism to be correctly labeled as such, it has to fall under a widely assigned definition, not a finger pointing rant.
anonymous1: Will you please name your source(s) for this statement?. (media has anti Israel bias)
CNN, ABC, Rueters. AP and a host more. Like you wish to have individual examples?
Albertaghost: I'm still trying to pin you down for your widely accepted definition of terrorism. This is certainty not it as the 911 hijackers were terrorists yet never used a child as a human shield so please elaborate'
No bigotry at all. Hamas uses human shields in Gaza to fend off Israeli troops and, Israeli troops have been caught using same to fend off Hamas fighters. It is a war crime, not terrorism as Israeli troops do not commit random violence with the sole purpose of creating terror to inflict a political change. I stated that if Hamas took children hostage and used them as human shields within Israel (as they certainly could not take Israeli children hostage in Gaza as there are none) then that would be considered terrorism. Similarly, if there were a terrorist Israeli group who infiltrated Gaza and took Palestinian children hostage and used them as human shields while they committed random acts of violence to inflict a political change then that would also be considered terrorism but, as we both know, that does not happen on either side hence, it is a war crime in this particular instance(s) not terrorism.
Actually I only go by the definition that encompasses the one I gave in the OP of the terrorism thread. For an act of terrorism to be correctly labeled as such, it has to fall under a widely assigned definition, not a finger pointing rant.
CNN, ABC, Rueters. AP and a host more. Like you wish to have individual examples?
No bigotry at all. Hamas uses human shields in Gaza to fend off Israeli troops and, Israeli troops have been caught using same to fend off Hamas fighters. It is a war crime, not terrorism as Israeli troops do not commit random violence with the sole purpose of creating terror to inflict a political change. I stated that if Hamas took children hostage and used them as human shields within Israel (as they certainly could not take Israeli children hostage in Gaza as there are none) then that would be considered terrorism. Similarly, if there were a terrorist Israeli group who infiltrated Gaza and took Palestinian children hostage and used them as human shields while they committed random acts of violence to inflict a political change then that would also be considered terrorism but, as we both know, that does not happen on either side hence, it is a war crime in this particular instance(s) not terrorism.
Actually I only go by the definition that encompasses the one I gave in the OP of the terrorism thread. For an act of terrorism to be correctly labeled as such, it has to fall under a widely assigned definition, not a finger pointing rant.
CNN, ABC, Rueters. AP and a host more. Like you wish to have individual examples?
like i said beforeBUSH IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST CHENEY AND RUMESFIELD AND MR. HALLIBURTON AND MR.BLACKWATER SAME PEOLE
Albertaghost: I'm still trying to pin you down for your widely accepted definition of terrorism. This is certainty not it as the 911 hijackers were terrorists yet never used a child as a human shield so please elaborate'
No bigotry at all. Hamas uses human shields in Gaza to fend off Israeli troops and, Israeli troops have been caught using same to fend off Hamas fighters. It is a war crime, not terrorism as Israeli troops do not commit random violence with the sole purpose of creating terror to inflict a political change. I stated that if Hamas took children hostage and used them as human shields within Israel (as they certainly could not take Israeli children hostage in Gaza as there are none) then that would be considered terrorism. Similarly, if there were a terrorist Israeli group who infiltrated Gaza and took Palestinian children hostage and used them as human shields while they committed random acts of violence to inflict a political change then that would also be considered terrorism but, as we both know, that does not happen on either side hence, it is a war crime in this particular instance(s) not terrorism.
Actually I only go by the definition that encompasses the one I gave in the OP of the terrorism thread. For an act of terrorism to be correctly labeled as such, it has to fall under a widely assigned definition, not a finger pointing rant.
CNN, ABC, Rueters. AP and a host more. Like you wish to have individual examples?
No bigotry at all. Hamas uses human shields in Gaza to fend off Israeli troops and, Israeli troops have been caught using same to fend off Hamas fighters. It is a war crime, not terrorism as Israeli troops do not commit random violence with the sole purpose of creating terror to inflict a political change. I stated that if Hamas took children hostage and used them as human shields within Israel (as they certainly could not take Israeli children hostage in Gaza as there are none) then that would be considered terrorism. Similarly, if there were a terrorist Israeli group who infiltrated Gaza and took Palestinian children hostage and used them as human shields while they committed random acts of violence to inflict a political change then that would also be considered terrorism but, as we both know, that does not happen on either side hence, it is a war crime in this particular instance(s) not terrorism.
Actually I only go by the definition that encompasses the one I gave in the OP of the terrorism thread. For an act of terrorism to be correctly labeled as such, it has to fall under a widely assigned definition, not a finger pointing rant.
CNN, ABC, Rueters. AP and a host more. Like you wish to have individual examples?
NOW ITS A WORD GAME ITS ABOUT YOUR DEFINATION WHEN YOU KILL SOMEONE HE IS DEAD DEAD DEAD NO MATTER DEAD IS DEAD
Albertaghost: I'm still trying to pin you down for your widely accepted definition of terrorism.
Why are you having such a hard time with the widely accepted deinition of terrorism when it applies to Israeli soldiers?
Anything anybody has ever done, that got them charged with terrorisim in a court of law, or defined by a court of law, is my definition of an act terrorism; even if Israeli people do it, regardless of where they do it, or who they do it to.
My Daughter's mother is a registered with the FBI as a terrorist.
She never had a bomb, or hid behind a child on a battle field.
OBTW, she's Jewish.
.
anonymous1: Why are you having such a hard time with the widely accepted deinition of terrorism when it applies to Israeli soldiers?...
I didn't sleep Saturday night; I'm having problems with spelling, and sentence structure today.
I edited that to make more sense.
anonymous1: Why are you having such a hard time with the widely accepted deinition of terrorism when it applies to Israeli soldiers?
Anything anybody has ever done, that got them charged with terrorisim in a court of law, or is defined by a court of law as terrorism, is my definition of terrorism; even if Israeli people do it, regardless of where they do it, or who they do it to.
My Daughter's mother is registered with the FBI as a terrorist.
She never had a bomb, or hid behind a child on a battle field.
OBTW, she's Jewish.
Anything anybody has ever done, that got them charged with terrorisim in a court of law, or is defined by a court of law as terrorism, is my definition of terrorism; even if Israeli people do it, regardless of where they do it, or who they do it to.
My Daughter's mother is registered with the FBI as a terrorist.
She never had a bomb, or hid behind a child on a battle field.
OBTW, she's Jewish.
.
anonymous1: Why are you having such a hard time with the widely accepted deinition of terrorism when it applies to Israeli soldiers?
Simply because it does not fit a widely accepted definition of terrorism. That you call them that puzzles me so I asked you for your definition.
Here is one fairly lengthy one;
"""Terrorism is an anxiety-inspiring method of repeated violent action, employed by (semi-)clandestine individual, group, or state actors, for idiosyncratic, criminal, or political reasons, whereby—in contrast to assassination—the direct targets of violence are not the main targets. The immediate human victims of violence are generally chosen randomly (targets of opportunity) or selectively (representative or symbolic targets) from a target population, and serve as message generators. Threat- and violence-based communication processes between terrorist (organization), (imperiled) victims, and main targets are use to manipulate the main target (audience(s), turning it into a target of terror, a target of demands, or a target of attention, depending on whether intimidation, coercion, or propaganda is primarily sought"
""
anonymous1: Anything anybody has ever done, that got them charged with terrorisim in a court of law, or defined by a court of law, is my definition of an act terrorism; even if Israeli people do it, regardless of where they do it, or who they do it to.
Then I should like to see these examples and the charges then prior to accepting your contentions that this or that is terrorism or a terrorist then.
anonymous1:
My Daughter's mother is a registered with the FBI as a terrorist.
She never had a bomb, or hid behind a child on a battle field.
OBTW, she's Jewish. .
My Daughter's mother is a registered with the FBI as a terrorist.
She never had a bomb, or hid behind a child on a battle field.
OBTW, she's Jewish. .
So she is in jail then? What was the action that saw her tried and convicted?
.
My Daughter's Jewish mother got listed with the FBI as a terrorist before 911, for political activities protesting the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii; and, her outspoken vocalaztions for personal sovereignty.
While she was wearing an ammunition belt.
If your definition of terrorist does not include that, take it up with the State of Hawaii, and the FBI.
.
Albertaghost: Simply because it does not fit a widely accepted definition of terrorism...
So she is in jail then? What was the action that saw her tried and convicted?
So she is in jail then? What was the action that saw her tried and convicted?
My Daughter's Jewish mother got listed with the FBI as a terrorist before 911, for political activities protesting the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii; and, her outspoken vocalaztions for personal sovereignty.
While she was wearing an ammunition belt.
If your definition of terrorist does not include that, take it up with the State of Hawaii, and the FBI.
.
anonymous1: .
My Daughter's Jewish mother got listed with the FBI as a terrorist before 911, for political activities protesting the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii; and, her outspoken vocalaztions for personal sovereignty.
While she was wearing an ammunition belt.
If your definition of terrorist does not include that, take it up with the State of Hawaii, and the FBI.
.
My Daughter's Jewish mother got listed with the FBI as a terrorist before 911, for political activities protesting the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii; and, her outspoken vocalaztions for personal sovereignty.
While she was wearing an ammunition belt.
If your definition of terrorist does not include that, take it up with the State of Hawaii, and the FBI.
.
Now I get it - terrorism is speaking or protesting. Oh, and being against the Kingdom of Hawaii.
So, how does Israel and Hamas fit into this protesting and state of Hawaii then?
More Threads
Nature
What I Lack In Vocabulary
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Reality Check
rarotonga
How far is too far?
everything is changing
1830's Music
Icebergs Still Around
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »