There seems to be some confusion. A person develops antibodies to Covid-19, because they are infected with Covid-19. The antibodies tag the virus for destruction by killer T cells. There's a biological war happening within the person that takes time. However, it does not mean that the infected person is no longer capable of infecting another person. As long as there are virus in the person, infecting cells, they can still infect others. That's the key, not the antibodies themselves. Don't get me wrong, the antibodies are a step towards the eradication of the virus, but it does not necessarily mean the person is virus free. Indeed, as an extreme example, imagine a person who does not have effective killer T cells. That person may not effectively ever rid themselves of the virus. In the best case with effective T cells, it's still a war within the body. However, testing for the virus is how you determine if the war was won or not.
J - both Biden and Trump are being tested frequently. Much more frequently than most Americans. So I guess, that unless a test comes back positive, they both ASSUME they are still negative as per their last test determined. Why Trump continues to not socially distance and wear a mask after a positive test is much more troubling.
As usual, Trump is more concerned with stroking his ego, than the health of the American public. It will be one of many reasons, that he will lose to Biden.
Sorry Jack. I misunderstood the situation, because before I moved the cursor over that area of the photo, Pence's daughter wasn't even in the photo on my screen. So, I thought she was the one taking the photo. Regardless, the explanation is similar. His daughter is much shorter and blocked in the reflection by the much taller and broad shoulders of Pence. You can see just a tad bit of her hair behind his hair in the reflection.
From my perspective, Harris was the clear winner. Pence certainly did better than Trump, but that's not saying much.
It also seemed that his left eye was red. It could be pink eye, which about 30% of Covid-19 patients experience. It might mean, that he's infected. Time will tell.
Definitely, because of his horrendous track record, the president is unelectable and because of the ages of both of the presidential candidates, the VP, including their age, is important. Plus, Trump already served a term, if he somehow won, it would be his last term. So, could Pence run in 2024 ? Biden has indicated, that he just wants to right the ship and then step down in 2025. So, how presidential is Kamala. Both will be remembered for how they behave at this debate.
Physical attraction is merely a 'foot in the door'. Where it goes from there is the important part, that determines whether the relationship will be of value and last.
That's on the box for legal purposes. Sort of like the one on the rubber package. It doesn't mean wearing a rubber does no good. It means it isn't a guarantee. Wearing a mask does a LOT of good. But, it's not perfect.
He's convinced a lot of dimwits, that they don't need a mask, nor to socially distance. Do you think some people visiting the White House might be influenced by him ?
I believe this is a reference to him telling that person not to report his (Trump's) initial positive test, until he got it confirmed with a second test.
Since he is tested daily, this is why it is crucial to know when he first tested positive. It's believed that a fundraiser in NJ is where the White House outbreak originated. If so, he's likely still contagous.
His presidency has never been about what is best for the American people in general. Instead, it's about what gets Trump's jollies off. Getting the cheers from his minority of supporters apparently is more important to him and the dopes, who support him, while he helps spread the virus like Donald VirusSeed at those rallies.
JimNastics Blog Comments (11,843)
The Infant-in-chief rejects virtual debate
There seems to be some confusion. A person develops antibodies to Covid-19,because they are infected with Covid-19. The antibodies tag the virus for destruction by killer T cells. There's a biological war happening within the person that takes time. However, it does not mean that the infected person is no longer capable of infecting another person. As long as there are virus in the person, infecting cells, they can still infect others. That's the key, not the antibodies themselves. Don't get me wrong, the antibodies are a step towards the eradication of the virus, but it does not necessarily mean the person is virus free.
Indeed, as an extreme example, imagine a person who does not have effective killer T cells.
That person may not effectively ever rid themselves of the virus.
In the best case with effective T cells, it's still a war within the body.
However, testing for the virus is how you determine if the war was won or not.