Not all, but you yourself are a perfect example of solopsist selfishness and a have a very typically female mentality, one which partially explains the relative deterioration of Western politics and society since women were given the vote.
And reality exists. Stone is hard. Water is Wet. Twice 2 makes 4. And this applies to the entire Human race.
The fashion(The Leftoid fashion)is to purge the imagined sins of reclamation projects at the altar of social standing.
And of course, the woman's emotional nature means that they will naturally project their emotional state onto others and everything. For instance, if a woman is losing a rational debate - where relaity clashed with her emotions - she will develop immunity to reality and will almost always lower the argument to an emotional and subjective level, sometimes even denying that right and wrong or true and false even exist - a woman(or womanly male)can deny the existence of external reality itself because she is so fanatical about her own sense of judgement and perception and is so alien to concept of self-criticism.
The question is why, you can't agree or disagree with that kind of question. And I never claimed that they were superior, I informed of certain ways in which we know that they are superior.
And I don't know why he avoided you, perhaps he finds you too warlike and negative.
'AS I PASS through my incarnations in every age and race, I make my proper prostrations to the Gods of the Market Place. Peering through reverent fingers I watch them flourish and fall, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings, I notice, outlast them all.
We were living in trees when they met us. They showed us each in turn That Water would certainly wet us, as Fire would certainly burn: But we found them lacking in Uplift, Vision and Breadth of Mind, So we left them to teach the Gorillas while we followed the March of Mankind.
We moved as the Spirit listed. They never altered their pace, Being neither cloud nor wind-borne like the Gods of the Market Place, But they always caught up with our progress, and presently word would come That a tribe had been wiped off its icefield, or the lights had gone out in Rome.
With the Hopes that our World is built on they were utterly out of touch, They denied that the Moon was Stilton; they denied she was even Dutch; They denied that Wishes were Horses; they denied that a Pig had Wings; So we worshipped the Gods of the Market Who promised these beautiful things.
When the Cambrian measures were forming, They promised perpetual peace. They swore, if we gave them our weapons, that the wars of the tribes would cease. But when we disarmed They sold us and delivered us bound to our foe, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “Stick to the Devil you know.”
On the first Feminian Sandstones we were promised the Fuller Life (Which started by loving our neighbour and ended by loving his wife) Till our women had no more children and the men lost reason and faith, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “The Wages of Sin is Death.”
In the Carboniferous Epoch we were promised abundance for all, By robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul; But, though we had plenty of money, there was nothing our money could buy, And the Gods of the Copybook Headings said: “If you don’t work you die.”
Then the Gods of the Market tumbled, and their smooth-tongued wizards withdrew And the hearts of the meanest were humbled and began to believe it was true That All is not Gold that Glitters, and Two and Two make Four And the Gods of the Copybook Headings limped up to explain it once more.
As it will be in the future, it was at the birth of Man There are only four things certain since Social Progress began. That the Dog returns to his Vomit and the Sow returns to her Mire, And the burnt Fool’s bandaged finger goes wabbling back to the Fire;
And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins, As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn, The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return!
What force? Globalism, immigration & Liberal education are the three things I oppose more than anything else. Opposition to each of these is high upon the agenda for the average voter, pronouncedly so for the first two.
Since when did everything that wasn't raw selfishness and outright treason becomes evil statism - why don't you call it evil statism when Lincoln or Washington did it?... I know why, because you're a dishonest and self-serving git who knows that calling Lincoln an evil statist would not curry favour for you.
Were you bullied in High school, Conrad? See, I'm just trying to understand where your contempt for the common man comes from? A contempt so strong that you would see China crowned as the world's greatest superpower before admitting you may be mistaken. Which emotion is it in you that makes you immune to reality to such an extent that you de facto support a system that violates everything you apparently stand for?
Or do you just have no scruples whatsoever, just like every "Capitalist" enriching themselves from statist labour right now as we speak.
We either produce more per hour, or we get paid less per hour. Look around you, do you think a society which grants liberties, luxuries and privacy and space to the individual can compete, man to man, with a culture that has so few of the "inefficiencies" that make us Human?
Western workers can not compete with this and they are now(largely)surplus to productive requirements - hence the massive welfare state - and soon the great forces of treason and greed that destroyed the workers will be turned on the middle classes. And the only Western people left with wealth will be the internationalist, parasitic, have-yacht class which understands no concept of patriotism and loyalty to the home nation, and merely sees a country and land as a host for its existence.
A civilised society has a government which oversees public affairs. The specifics of what is "civilised" is(to an extent)a subjective manifestation of the culture.
And do you really believe that the thrust of globalisation is about expanding democracy and not increasing profit and material consumption? You think Humanity places moral interests above the physical? I'd have to disagree, people fight for their interests far more fiercely than they will fight for their rights.
The only other way, the market way, of beating Chinese industry is by making our standard of living and conditions lower than that of the Chinese. No civilised and sane society would knowingly do such a thing, and if it did, then the kids will hate you for it(and we do).
We've seen an expansion of free trade though haven't we. The proof is in the vast industrial districts of China, which have crippled the industrial heartlands of neraly every Western country. But Reagan is correct, government does control people - it's called Law & Order and civilised society - and you/we need the government to force business to develop the West as opposed to sweating the East. We need "in house" now more than ever.
Free trade is the issue. Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson.. none of these three could be described as free-traders, indeed America boomed by not competing with the industrial powehouses of Europe(think of how this relates West-East relationship today),yet for some reason America seems to have embraced globalism under its skewed "capitalist" narrative.
The civilised man abides to a civilised code, the validity of which is verified by society(note: this code is not in law). Therefore, the civilised man(by definiton)sacrifices a portion of his individual freedom to society.
The savage is free to do whatever his own power can allow him to do, no codes of honour, ethics, body of organisation or fellow Human Being is going to tell him otherwise.
Then we need to develop a system that accords to Human nature.
But what needs to be remembered is that there's a difference between the civilsed man and the savage - or there could be no art, no culture and no science - The civilised man will think objectively and abstractly over the longterm in enlightened self-interest, the savage(see Conrad)will respond to nothing but instinctive animal lusts and motivations of immediate self-interest.
In any case, we need a system that accurately refelcts how much of the population is civilised and how much is savage at any given time. Socialism, I feel, is above Humanity except under highly exceptional circumstances and times - which is why it leads to the Gulag.
And I'm not talking just about the state. There's organically occuring organisation. Social pressures that lead the individual to behave in a way that maximises the social good: Such as marriage or the way we discourage people from taking drugs.
There is no such thing as Capitalism and Socialism in practice.
These words simpy mask a dichotomy as old civilisation itself, which is the compromise between the individual and the society's rights, the balance between freedom and order, liberty and organisation and the one and the many.
Not so much people, but all the world's wealth, technology and industry certainly are.
And you're called a land of opportunity because you are/were a land of opportunity. There was a load of natural resources, good land and plenty of living space with few mouths to feed from it - this is your opportunity, opportunity that physically(not ideologically)exists.
Nope, in my field women often get promoted above men because so few women are interested in engineering. In total I think 6% of UK engineering jobs are done by women, yet the higher up the ladder you go the higher that percentage becomes... at technician level the figure drops to around 4%.
This means that either women are innately superior to men, or that they are being given a leg up and the system is biased and corrupt.
You idealise the Chav, what there is, at best, is a sense that what they're good at - physical skill - is neglected by society. Over which they're correct.
And that's only a glimpse of eastern education glossed over by universal fact that every decent parent wants the best for their children. Yes, the bright and talented are encouraged to make the most of their gift, but the mass of mediocrity are expected to become workers. Their talentless are not told that they are talented because they do not live in a arrogant and vain society.
Foreigners(non-Westerners)are thoroughly anti-Marxist in their commonsensical attitude that not everybody can be an academic/intellectual/professional. Their ethic is similar to the ethic which governed the old grammar school, a system that worked well and didn't necessitate the parent getting involved to a large degree.
Sure, and school is important because it's coming out from under your parent's wing, it's adjusting you to the world at a time when you are the most malleable and adaptive.
My criticism is aimed at exactly what is taught in Western schools, which is not what they'll teach in Hong Kong. Hence why the far east is succeeding in the world, whereas the West is, largely, too busy failing and murdering kids.
The frequency of this line in education and public life partially explains why the greatest ambition in life amongst girls my age is winning the X Factor.
On principle, no I don't. Going out to school is an integral part of social development.
However, seen as schools are churning out legions of drop-outs and semi-literate sociologists and sports "scientists", I do feel that parents may provide a less rudderless environment for kids to develop meritable skill and worthwhile potential.
And I made a point of adding 'Nationality: British' to my CV.. possibly because I'm an engineer and productive(non-Leftoid)industries have a preference for British workers - many in my field vote UKIP - so, it's not that they necessarily prefer immigrants.
The biggest complaint from employers about British youth is what their Leftoid teachers are teaching them. And how Liberal/modern education is delivering a whole generation of kids with useless skills.
Crap, kids today work harder than your generation ever did. A day in a British factory is like something not seen in decades, we don't spend hours at a time m**turbating in the toilets or out striking like our parents did. And it's true that many middle class kids do nonsense degrees, but the sham economy that facilitates nonsense degrees is failing, which means these graduates are unemployed whereas polytechnic graduates from your era largely found work in some non-productive, debt-creating "enterprise" or other.
But true about employers, the answer is to hit them hard, but also to build relations with the immigrants accept, expand the circle of trust and show that we hold no animosity towards them, so that they will grass out the illegals.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: What are reasons for judging of those who judge others due to their sick mental mind?
Not all, but you yourself are a perfect example of solopsist selfishness and a have a very typically female mentality, one which partially explains the relative deterioration of Western politics and society since women were given the vote.And reality exists. Stone is hard. Water is Wet. Twice 2 makes 4. And this applies to the entire Human race.