The problem with Feminism for me is how distinctly unfeminine Feminists are, women don't seem to evolved to the conclusion that the best way of showing their equality is not by mimicing a man and a male mindset, pretending that they have the same talents and capabilities of men, but by acknowledging differences and fighting for their own inherent talents, capabilities and mentality to be taken seriously.
The fact that the better parent is usually the mother is nothing to be ashamed of.
I'd say alot of peoples lives fall short of their aspirations, everyone has to attempt to bury their sorrow, problems and aggression that is all part of 'civilization' it has absolutely nothing to do with being male. .
I agree completely, at no time has liberal democracy been able to direct business, some western politicians back in the 1910's & 1920's were unable to reverse the wheels of globalisation, even though they feared its ultimate collapse, which they got in 1929, things will be no different today.
As long as the system of international finance exists in it's current format, then the world will forever be a plutocracy(rule of wealth) and elected government no more than decoration to provide a veneer of freedom and democracy in the west.
Sounds like the flow switch in your combi boiler has gone, or if it's a conventional system it'll be the motorised valve which would be near your hot water tank... either way it's one for the landlord.
Yes what do you think I mean by the uneasy ground of socialism, what we don't have is a capitalism with a predetermined objective, set by the state, but a state I believe should be formed by votes by associated-professions to form industry specific guilds of expertise, to set intelligble and realistic goals, instead of voting by party or region for corrupt careerists and charlatans.
no, monopilies can be established without government, companies can still undercut and annihialte competition freely, they'll buy governments to aid them but they don't require them, and certain governments of the past have stood upto corporatism whilst also creating a more productive well run society without the greyness of the soviets.
Government is potentially the only way to combat the monopilisation, not through welfareism tho, but by well-managed self-sufficient economies based on regionalised trade. Government only adorns it's people, it encourages the corporate & financial stranglehold on society. Boom is a time when workers are pushed to the grindstone and bust is when they starve, if the system is incapable of distributing the means of production and wealth creation over the long term and causes the threat of bolshevism or the uneasy ground of socialism then that system is false and has to altered. Boom and bust just exposes capitalisms age and lack of sophistication, and feudalism was of the past and so one day will this form of capitalism.
Oh and capitalism increases conditions and decreases the birth rate in the 1st world(until the credit bubble bursts), and does the opposite in the 2nd and 3rd worlds.
The temperature is falling in the short term because that is the natural cycle, however when the temperature peaks it is higher than it's previous peak without fail, and has been this way for the past 150 years, yours is a common argument to allay peoples fears and to allow capitalism to maximise profit. The global tax on emissions is ridiculous, because it won't work, a whole new planned, altruistic system of society needs to be developed to tackle climate change, peak oil and the cultural degeneration that plagues the west, a degeneration that cuts deeper with the coming of each generation.
I'm not defending China morally, neverless it sustains life for 2.5 billion people, with far less squalor than western puppet nations in the developing world, this in itself is an achievement, and also enforces birth rate restrictions which are completely essential for a variety of reasons. You may want to look at some of the TB ridden sweatshops in supposedly democratic developing countries to get an unbiased opinion on what true repression actually looks like.
Christianity comes from the middle east so all Christians have a right to some part of it, or not? It is my view that the Jews are westernised to a large degree and can lead harmonius lives within the west, the same can not be said for the bulk of the Muslims. I believe civil war will erupt between the white working class and the Muslims eventually if Islam in the west is continually defended by cowardly, enjoy the fence liberals who do nothing but exassabate the situation in the face of this Islamic expansionism.
All in all it seems to me both more logical and reasonable to allow the Muslims to keep the desert, and for Jewish culture to integrate into western culture on the grounds that we have alot more in common, and both our cultures are cradled by modern science.
No it's far worse than the environmentalists claim, I believe the bulk of the scientific community, and also believe a policy of safe than sorry should be applied when handling the lives of billions. The economic problems of China and Japan are less than ours, Japan has an excellent run state infrastructure, and China the capacity to organise the people to fair the storm so to speak, both countries are far less connected with Israel than the west. I think branding it their 'homeland' is certainly debateable.
Isreal needs not child soldiers nor suciide bombers it has western technology and western arms for the purpose of protecting itself as the dominant minority in that part of the world.
The war was inevitable, but Israel relies on it's technology to maintain it's borders, rightly or wrongly, now given that the wests position in the world is falling and the whole global system borders on collapse, due to western bankruptcy, global warming, peak oil etc. Then to me Israel is fighting a losing battle, and runs the risk of being overwhelmed through sheer force of Muslim numbers alone. It seems to me that this Zionist lunge into imperialism is just setting up innocent Jewish people into yet another humanitarian disaster.
haha, I suppose the closest i'll get to a compliment from you, for you to accuse me of skewing what other people say when you still offer no argument except this babble, where basically your just saying ignore him if he points out any potential flaws in your ideas, or offers any criticism, all in an internet forum called for Palestine.
Yea your right, Israel probably won't receive that much from the West. Israels build up of state infrastructure was heavily financed by the west though, from which Israel can then launch it's economy from, and then all the while you've got millions of jealous Arabs looking on.
I was born here and I have a right to live here. Its right nations have rules to allow foreigners to become citizens, but those rules should be equal between the races. Considering the government says i'm to become an ethnic minority within my own lifetime, it can't be that hard surely?
Mass-immigration would also undercut the working class and increase poverty for the nations poor. Which is whats happening now, which is why the likes of the arsehole Griffin and the British national party start getting votes!
Considering I believe the EU and especially this Lisbon treaty will usher in the last stage of the decline of western society, I somehow have to disagree with you. This being one of two forums ive posted in, the other on the Quran in which I speak of it negatively.
Yea I accept that, it was a ridiculous concept in the first place. My ethics still make me side with the displaced populace though. Some early zionists wanted to build a Jewish nation in south america, in hindsight could of been a much better idea.
Yea I agree with you, finance capitalism has caused a major problem by lending too much money to people unable to repay. But on the other hand, money lending drives consumerism, and all the low-wage crappy service sector jobs that come with it, because fundamentally these kind of jobs rely on peoples decadence rather than their needs (epitomised by the fact that we import loads and export little), it requires us to borrow money to fuel this cycle of consume everything create nothing.
The treaty was born out of holocaust sympathy for the Jewish people, doesn't that create a bias against the palestinian people? Also external funding for the palestinian people pales an insignificance when compared to external funding for the people of Israel.
Another fine old case of each generation believing it wiser than than the one that comes after. As for facts you could simply look at a map of Palestinian controlled lands from 1947 through to the present day.
TrueBlue1986 Forum Posts (1,322)
RE: Gender Equality?
The problem with Feminism for me is how distinctly unfeminine Feminists are, women don't seem to evolved to the conclusion that the best way of showing their equality is not by mimicing a man and a male mindset, pretending that they have the same talents and capabilities of men, but by acknowledging differences and fighting for their own inherent talents, capabilities and mentality to be taken seriously.The fact that the better parent is usually the mother is nothing to be ashamed of.