It is the nature of left-wingers to defy and disrespect their own culture, and to forever dissect, diabolize and destroy the way of life that Mothered them. Islam is the biggest enemy of Western ethics and systems and so the Left naturally gravitates towards them, regardless of the fact that Islam is both anti-gay and anti-woman, two major issues that the left professes to care about.
I can bet my all that these converts are politically Liberal, the last thing they will be is patriotic.
Historic environment is part of evolution,a people over countless generations adapt to the landscape and climate. For example a black man in England can still usually run faster than a white man in England, as they retain the characteristics best suited to their historical homeland - perhaps an obvious example but there are many others. So the differentation between the races lie predominantly within the genes, whereas the immediate environment creates the differences between individuals
Are you suggesting there is no bias within and from the EU itself - the organisation which is perhaps the most sorry venture into globalism modern humanity has?
And whom exactly are these ideologues and decadents that infest Brussels to think they have the right to order the world in accordance to their perception of events? Why have any respect for them?
Each one of these things happened during the decline of the Roman empire, there was no salvation that followed for them, the dark ages followed. Study your history, all of the high-cultures have declined in a remarkably similar fashion to Rome then and us today.
This is not a sign of a salvation, just a sign that society(like everything else)has a lifespan, and so must one day cease to be.
All I can say is it's a fine line between being sensitive and being insecure.. the fact that many attempts have been made to contact her, coupled with the thread itself suggests this girl matters quite alot to the guy, perhaps more so than she should do. To me this looks like insecurity more than it does sensitivity and in honesty I wouldn't be surprised if the girl got this impression from him too.
You're right though in an ideal world it would be better if she would of just been forthcoming with him in the first place, but many people don't say what they truly think especially if it may hurt feelings - so I wouldn't hold it against her.
Just get yourself out and on it a bit more, chat more women up, meet more people, make different kinds of friends(real life friends).
I'd say the reason why you feel down has more to do with you than it does with her, look to the inner reasons why you are pining for a woman you've only met once and why you feel the need to analyse and justify your own behaviour towards her.
Afterall if she isn't interested in you then that's her loss - there's no better way of looking at it.
That would depend if the world continues to rely on the dollar for tade purposes, the long-term prospects of which are dubious at the least. As for the moment America is simply too large to allow it to fail, so money will continue to be thrown at the problem regardless of the not yet perceived consequences of doing so.
This is where I dislike religion. As in my opinion belief in an afterlife demotes the importance of this life. In a sense are you not undermining the importance of this life on Earth by dismissing it as a precursor - or even prologue - to something greater, a heaven or nirvana for example?
Should it not be the case that your actions on Earth should be second to nothing in importance? In life, is not every man only equal to what he does? And that faiths, thoughts, words and ideologies are infinitely inferior to actions?
I personally don't believe the powers-that-be care what average people think. How much of a threat to them could today's generations be, considering we're more apathetic than ever before? More self-involved than ever before?
My favourite would be The League of Gentlemen. It's so dark, different, eccentric, intelligent and outright weird that only the British could come out with it.
Some may call it that and it is still possible. You change the biosphere and the climate(which the biosphere regulates)changes with it - it's an undeniable logic of cause and effect.
Yet anyone who tells you they know what climate change will be is either a liar or a fool. It's a science of pure speculation as there is no prior experience to draw upon, which means no sure answers.
You couldn't raise it to any more then £20,000 though, it is bad enough at that already. As for every student who fails to pay back the loan the banking system suffers, and as we have learnt through experience of late that when the banks suffer, we suffer. Encouraging more borrowing to enter university - given that there is every chance the money won't be paid back - is the recipe for another banking collapse.
In a sense yea, I don't for a second consider the average wet-behind-the-ears student to be behind the violence. However there's a strong self-righteous feeling amongst the students(there was one when I was there too), and a feeling that they can take and do anything they want to society, as they inherently feel they have the right to slack-off at everybody elses expense - so i'm not suprised to see this spoilt behaviour amongst the protests, as it's endemic to British student's attitude itself.
Many British student's are an inferior mob and not an intellectual elite, many have said that for years.
I'm glad the government doesn't consider it right to make a shelfstacker on minimum wage support a mediocre student studying sports sceince at a university anybody could get a place in.
Make university free for all by only allowing the finest minds to go there - bring back the idea that further education is for intelligent people, problem solved.
Could come from many places. If it's in the West it will be a series of civil wars - post economic collapse - between Neo-Liberals/globalites/multiculturalists and the inevitable backlash against these extremists.
That would be the resulting case if onlookers were to intellectualise and rationalise an apparent justification for either side not to defend itself, and to instead force them into submission to objective arguments which are not born out of any experience whatsoever.
Do you not also think that in all probability, our ancestors down the ages, those residing in peaceful times, would of had similar visions of eternal peace to yours?
In some abstract and ideal world maybe, but these are two peoples with a large philosophical and intellectual gulf between them locked in a history of rivalry. Justice doesn't enter into the law of nature, war and conflict such as this, whichever side pushes the hardest and the farthest wins. The only lasting compromise, the only lasting peace, would be a Carthaginian peace.
Do you really think that if the borders reverted to those of 1967 then that would be it, problem solved, no more animosity between the Jewish and Muslim people? Are you seriously suggesting as an intelligent man that this would resolve everything?
If both nation's had nuclear arms then you'd probably see less conflict as both sides would be in mutual fear of one another - however it only takes one lunatic leader with a kamikaze attitude for this to all go wrong.
Every nation has a chance of being headed by such a leader at some point, Israel to an extent and Iran to a larger extent in my opinion, so in an ideal world I'd prefer neither to be armed with nuclear weapons, but I do consider Iran more of a danger with such weapons.
We'll see about that. Young English people, black and white, are protesting against them in every town where they number - this is in spite of the multicultural brainwashing every Briton is subjected to day in day out.
Power to those whom both deserve and work for it. Not everyone pulls their weight in life, so why should they be granted an equal status to those that do?
And politicians being terrorists that as may be, but the people have voted them into power to begin with, and it is also the people themselves that have allowed the corrupt plans of politicians to become reality.
That said, we must be all accountable for the failure, decline and corruption of Western society. For people to expect responsibility and accountability from their leaders, they must first be capable of them themselves.
The thought of the death penalty upsets many people and hurts feelings, and as usual people care much more for sparing their own feelings than they do about doing the right thing.
There would be more justice in serious criminals rotting in a cell for the remainder of their lives, for them to be reminded and treated on a daily basis as scum instead of the use of the death penalty.
On the other hand, I'd much rather my taxes were going towards helping the aged, equipping the troops and teaching the young as opposed to locking criminals up indefinitely. So on the grounds that the innocent majority's needs outweigh the guilty minority's rights, I tentatively support the death penalty despite finding it unpleasant, and aswell regarding a portion of the penaltys' supporters as twisted and unhinged human beings.
No that isn't what i'm saying. I'm saying it's the fear of not having the answers to questions in life that drives people to god, and also to science for that matter.
TrueBlue1986 Forum Posts (1,322)
RE: .............CONVERTING,-IN THE NAME OF FAITH?........
It is the nature of left-wingers to defy and disrespect their own culture, and to forever dissect, diabolize and destroy the way of life that Mothered them. Islam is the biggest enemy of Western ethics and systems and so the Left naturally gravitates towards them, regardless of the fact that Islam is both anti-gay and anti-woman, two major issues that the left professes to care about.I can bet my all that these converts are politically Liberal, the last thing they will be is patriotic.