Yea I'd probably agree with that, in this day and age i'd rather have a Jewish overlord over a Muslim one, it's not an excuse, I see no merit on either side.
The Jews are the ones in the moral wrong only those blinded by their own political leanings would be ignorant of this, but if roles were reversed, with Muslims overseeing Jews instead of Jews overseeing Muslims, does anyone really think the Muslims wouldn't make life hell for the Jews, and for Muslims in power to respect western inspired international law when concerning their Jewish underlings? They are two religions born of one people, equally xenophobic, equally primitive.
You're right about the first bit there. International strike?? that's the same kind of materialistic Marxist babble which gave the modern world the worst person in its history.
Politics and politicians are products of our own attitudes and way of life. If a politician came along who was loyal, intelligent, interested, hard-working and uncorrupt, then he/she would want to force the people into line to avert future collapses, which would mean a more organised society and a general acceptance of certain privations from all people.
No one would vote for this, so it is childish nonsense to moan about these politicians who claim to represent us, when it is our own narrow-minded selfist lifestyle which ultimately grants power to these worthless parasites.
People talk as if their opinion matters on things such as this, America is just as warmongering under the so called lefty Democrats as it was under the Republicans, this tells you the government cares little for representing the will of its people and that its allegiances lay elsewhere.
A similar story unfolds across the rest of western government. The problem is not a specific 'nation' but a herd like mentality we are all guilty of that allows the powers that be free reign to do what they see fit, token bickering gets you nowhere.
It's bad for cohesion in the community, bad for womens heatlh(causes ricketts disease), bad for womens rights, undermines security and forces a state to treat certain people differently, it also statistically leads to a higher birth rate in an already overcrowded community/nation/world.
Ban it now, before the Nationalists do something about it.
As long as you work, and your position in work is not preventing employment for British citizens then that is fine. You should be free to work, arbeit macht frei.
Not such an issue in the developed world Ginger, and given global resources we could all potentially end up being a little less mechanised in time, I can also see the problems for employers for women getting pregnant, although I don't like this argument it nevertheless is a reality.
You can hardly count a college, as being public sector and filled with lazy-liberals, like a regular workplace. Think you misunderstand my position on this argument, my point is that the organised feminists are militant, extreme and detrimental to women and are probably the kind of women that brainwashed your ex against you, that is as long as you're not trying to blame others for your own failings.
Then it is a shame that the political cohesion falls into the hands of these militant feminists, I believe it removes genuine feminism as an option from younger women because it calls for many things only anti-male women would like. You argue this is a perception, but within a generation a perception can become the new reality.
I think the feminist movement is confused between womens rights and the views of man-hating lesbians, might explain why any real feminist movement disappeared long ago.
TrueBlue1986 Forum Posts (1,322)
RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)
Yea I'd probably agree with that, in this day and age i'd rather have a Jewish overlord over a Muslim one, it's not an excuse, I see no merit on either side.