Mr. Web, the answer is to try for a change we badly need. We have records of proven strength and passion of women in the past. Have you gone to the origin of the thread?
I am a very passionate person, at the same time I think I possess kindness and generosity. While the use of logic is far more important than any of these virtues, I do couple it with the good and positive sentiments most transparent in a woman.
Now PEACE? This is my hope that collective effort of the world including you and me will adhere to one principle and that is the preservation of world peace.
Of course Mr. WEb and that is how we can carry on a very sensitive yet crucial discussions for purposes of clarification in the hope that we can convince and or persuade others to our ideas. Or not and still it is a very healthy exercise for the brin if anything else. Thanks.
Mr. Web, thanks for joining in. But per the previous pages, hundreds of pundits are already against her and including me. But yes indeed, if she were the last standing woman running, I would..
I have always dreamed of her running after the direction she catapulted the Bush administration and as a very respected professor at Yale. But she chose the more placid road to life, away from the hurly burly of dirty politics.
That is your opinion Epirb, and I stand on mine that she is competent and in fact more competent than any that I know of, except perhaps for Condoleesa Rice. Her exposure and knowledge of the political position is way up there, but perhaps she doesn't want to sell her soul?
On your last part, I wouldn't be that demeaning to his status. I know for a fact that he is surrounded by many billionaires in the world or he wouldn't have the guts of cutting through Ukraine, but that is what he promised to his cohorts, where all their monies are invested. Should the free world allow that to happen, most likely if Obama keeps staying in power, then it is imminent, a threat to the rest of the world is scaled up.
But I doubt that he would have the strength to keep the aggression any longer.
He definitely wouldn't come in to our country as a truck driver, he would shoot himself before that will happen. But you never know.
Believe it or not, there is more in the politics of being homeless than what it seems. But you have know the unpublished statistics to get to the truth.
In example, these homeless veterans are not because they are homeless, it is part of their rehabilitation process of their inability to get back to society after trauma. They are well provided for in their needs but it is how they best handle their lives outside of a more horrifying experience, and that is the atrocities of war.
And for the majority, they are used by some local mafia to extort money from all over the place.
There are, however some that are legitimately considered homeless in one way or another.
But my question is? What has this got to do with the OP?
If you are trying to measure the wealth of each country, Google it, and Russia is way below the economic strength of the USA with 14.5 trillion count only seconded by China with 4.9 trillion per the GDP latest report.
It is very obvious the difference between you and I is that I focus on her talent, her strength, her intellect and her compassion which is the source of all the positive causes and effect she can contribute to the country, while you FOCUS ON HER FLAWS and her inability to run the country.
Let me ask you a question? Did you read the part, where I said that: "CONSIDERING THE ENORMOUS BLUNDERS AND INCOMPETENT" leadership exhibited by some MEN leadership, of which so many concur, including Happygolucky4you, WE MIGHT AS WELL PUT SOME WOMEN UP THERE, AND IT IT FAILS? SO WHAT, IT IS ALREADY NO BETTER THAN NOW ANYWAYS.
What you are doing is dissecting Hillary as though she is not competent at all and all you can present is because on how she forgave her husband? You might not be a forgiving person but that doesn't make you right while others opt to decide the way they seem fit for their interest.
So I stand strong on my proposal for her to run and if there is any woman running for the position other than her, I still would vote for her. For a change..
Of course it does. It propelled her to the most formidable position of winning the race. Which to your measure is a lacking of guts.
For your information, she can all to her own go on top of the scale with or without the scandal and perhaps can also win bigger had she acted as you expected, but she has class and perhaps love her husband so much.
I do not quite put that claim that she would have not been a senator or any position of her choice had she kicked her, rather it would have demonized her if in fact she loves her husband so much.
Nidi I am proud to be here, an American citizen with all the benefits that most citizens of the world can't have. And having said that, I can say that we're still the best in terms of societal services, legal system, economic strength and mighty military, but we can do better.
Corporate oligarchs as opposed to monarchial ones, I'm happy to be where I am.
It's not a matter whether you believe or not All, but I am not playing hard to get. It's just that I'm in a very comfortable place of my life so why stir when there is so much peace and calm in being who I am.
Unattractive it is All. For your information I have abundance of offers in RL as well as hear and I agree with you. UNATTRACTIVE, itvus. The best it serves me.
lol All. I didn't mean young as in their twenties either???? Wheww or even in their thirties or fourties??? No way, at least in their fifties. Yes..personally in my relationships, they were (three at separate times of course) always 10 to 14 years younger than me. Very smart, very kind and generous. But nothing lasts forever All and so it is. And that is why I am and will always be single from now on, I guess.
Yes indeed Ocee. You are right the folk heroes and backers of popular culture. That is what makes me believe at least we are still generally under the decency of good culture and class as Hillary is. The world bowed to her including me, and this alone gives me the confidence that she has both brain and compassionate heart, a most dignified character of a person.
A most needed trait for a balance leadership, IMHO.
Happy dear friend, how nice of you to join. How are you?
WEll I wouldn't discredit the fact that OUR COUNTRY WOULD HAVE NEVER ATTAINED WHERE IT IS AND WHAT IT IS NOW had not been for so many good presidents I can enumerate: George Washington, Jefferson, (drafted the declaration of independence) Lincoln, Ted Roosevelt, Kennedy and Reagan come to mind.
Each of these great leaders contributed to the legacy of supporting our unique ideals in terms of freedom and rights. Not to mention our economic power by Kennedy and Reagan and our strength of military and technology.
These libertarian principles but connected to conservatism (CONSTITUTIONAL foundation) are most strength of those leaders that is seemingly taken for granted by the new system.
And yes, THE FEDERAL RESERVE do play in the majority of decisions made to protect their monetary interest. A conflict that will always foreshadow our true practice of effective leadership. (rich versus the interest of the poor)
Strategically, it was much smarter to do what she did. Whether he had a thing with Lewinsky or not is not important in the grand scheme of things. If she had kicked him to the curb, she would never have become a Senator and subsequently SofState.
I do agree with you Nidi (how are you my friend? Fly back there in two weeks), And that is a trait that characterizes a good planning. The ability to foresee the future and the impact of ever action she makes.
Not only can she formulate the immediate impact but that she can lay down the foundation of a very long term positive effect of her actions. Now that is what we call VISIONARY ABILITY.
Who screwed who is not important only in so far as it can be used against someone and to evoke a public response.
On honesty, sometimes supporting a certain policy can create most conflict as to whom it will serve best. "THE NEED TO KNOW BASIS WHICH IS USED BY ANY GOVERNMENT" is an example. It is not because of dishonesty but that over transparency can create more trouble and serious damage to the constituents hence the need to be secretive. A most strategic application of political decision making.
Her pundits of course, will demand every inch of honesty when a certain wrong doing is involved, just like the Benghasi fiasco but nin the end it is the collective benefit of the whole nation that matters.
And more importantly in the world of chaos, what she did is a mark of strength. The ability to let people be forgiven and come to their senses.
I know some are like Lifeisadream, yet didn't Jesus answered Thomas when asked "HOW MANY TIMEWS MUST HE FORGIVE HIS BROTHER?" Jesus said and quote: "77 TIMES 77"
Now imagine the implications on this. Not that we are incorporating fundamentals of religious belief on here, but deep down on some of us, when a love one has committed us an error, yet our love to them is way deep, we can definitely offer them some forgiveness and move on.
Hillary is not characterized as LACKING THE GUTS just because of her position on being a forgiving woman. On the contrary it made me respect her more.
Yes indeed. One of the the downside on the reign governed through democratic system is the ability of the outside force to play by supporting the candidate that will most likely to endorse their policies,
While it is under deep scrutiny not to cripple the real agendas, it can definitely influence whatever programs those endorsers have.
Clinton during her campaign for the primary was almost an instant sensation over the donation she got from a big company.
I think your measure of her personal decision to forgive her husband on their marital concerns is too lame for you to judge her merits as a political stalwart with guts. I believe she earned more respect not only as a wife but as a woman with class and character.
I wouldn't personally judge her grip on what's effective leadership based on personal choices she does in her life regarding love and or commitment she puts on her marriage. MHO.
Well when is your next trip and perhaps I will give yo a tour guide?
There are some meetings sometimes scheduled for member on here. I haven't ever joined anyone yet, but perhaps there is nothing wrong to meet with fellow members, right?
lindsyjones Forum Posts (8,532)
a woman leader
Mr. Web, the answer is to try for a change we badly need. We have records of proven strength and passion of women in the past. Have you gone to the origin of the thread?I am a very passionate person, at the same time I think I possess kindness and generosity. While the use of logic is far more important than any of these virtues, I do couple it with the good and positive sentiments most transparent in a woman.
Now PEACE? This is my hope that collective effort of the world including you and me will adhere to one principle and that is the preservation of world peace.