Most Liked Opinionated Blogs (1,909)

Natali and Clayton Morris

From Patti. RoseHipster.

Americans are waking up to the many ways the Left has lied to them over the last several years, but too many still believe the Democrats’ narrative about the 2020 election. Why?

One of the most memorable lines from the 1995 movie “The Usual Suspects” is this: “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he did not exist.”

With just a little tweak, this statement could be applied to the last presidential election: “The greatest trick the Democrats ever pulled was convincing the voters they did not steal the 2020 election.”

Consider the number of things the Left has been willing to lie to the American people about in recent years. The short list includes: COVID, suppressing its origins and effective means of treatment; January 6, 2021, touted as worse than Pearl Harbor and 9/11 combined and jailing Capitol trespassers for over a year without trial dates; Hunter Biden’s laptop, immediately and roundly dismissed as “Russian disinformation”; destructive and deadly riots blithely labeled “mostly peaceful protests”; and parents at school board meetings protesting critical race theory viciously defamed and treated as would-be “domestic terrorists.”

But between all of these (and so many more) major news stories, Americans en masse have begun to wake up and search for the truth outside what’s being spoon-fed (and in some cases shovel-fed) to them by the corporate left-wing media. After going to alternative sources to discover facts and weigh evidence, eyes have been opened, and a new, healthy and proper “wokeness” has emerged. Finally, we have stirred a vibrant mistrust of those in whom, just a decade ago, most Americans trusted to tell us the truth.

So why has this leap of faithlessness not jumped over to the obvious facts of the 2020 election? Those currently in power have a clear track record of covering up the truth on major news stories, but we’re somehow supposed to believe what they say about the 2020 election?

Though they assure us with declarations that, “We did not steal the 2020 election,” common sense tells us otherwise. In my lifetime I have never seen another person on the planet who has been more incessantly demonized and hated than Donald Trump. And I believe most everyone would agree with this observation, regardless of whether they love Trump or believe he deserves everything that’s been said about him and thrown at him.

The Left spent four-plus years trying nonstop to impeach, disqualify, or simply get rid of Donald Trump. Then after that unrelenting assault leading up to the 2016 election, and continuing through to Election Day 2020, we are supposed to believe that they gave up on their direct attack and decided on a new, “can’t miss” winning strategy.

The Left to this day wants us to believe that they would never attempt anything nefarious to remove a man from office that they tried unceasingly and unethically to expunge for four years. This man they characterized as a buffoonish Hitler 2.0 was so incredibly dangerous to democracy that the only way to stop him from getting a second term, and by extension a second shot at destroying America from within, was to trust the voters to do the right thing? These same “deplorables” who voted Trump into office the first time could now certainly be counted upon to unceremoniously show him the exit the second time around?

Read more:

as most client states begin to default on their loan repayment requirements. A guest speaker this week at the 3rd Belt and Road (B&R) Initiative is the wanted war criminal Vladimir Putin. The B&R customer countries are mostly countries with large amounts of natural resources, rather than poor countries with not much of anything that would have greatly benefited from any improvements.. Most of the investment money is used to develop energy & mineral resources China hoped to someday export (aka pillage) and profit off as a partial repayment of the loan money due to China in return for the improvements on that countries roads and infrastructure. Sadly, like happened inside China's cities, many of the Chinese companies contracted by China to do the work in those places where the B&R was happening took out loans to start the constructions, started the constructions, then (under Chinese banks liberal loan policies) took out more loans to begin other projects, which they began before the first project was even half done, then repeated and repeated until the collapsing Chinese economy forced a halt to the easy loan policies. The projects not completed and their own cash on hand shrinking the countries can not repay, the energy and mineral infrastructures not built China can't export the resources of the host country, and of course the Chinese construction companies can't repay their loans to the Chinese banks or finish the projects they began. China is now faced with the choices of complete all projects and not see any financial benefit for decades, or simply walking away from many B&R projects in many countries

China's financial exposure to date on the B&R is over 600 Billion dollars in loan promises from the host countries. This is in addition to another 600 Billion dollars of B&R investment loans to develop oil resources in Russia. The investment rating risk of the projects is currently at B- which is only a step away from being a total loss. Chinese investments into Russia ceased in 2022, but Russia has not repaid it's debts to China and many projects there are not completed. The largest recent recipient of Chinese investment money is Iraq (10.5 Billion dollars of signed loan contracts) for the development of Iraq's oil resources. The total current debt exposure of China is about 1.3 Trillion dollars of which about 60% is in default.

The current 3rd forum in China is as more about the country leaders meeting with a debt collector and offering their excuses as it is about anything else.

The below YT video provides more detail, history, figures, etc. .

Meghan Markle reveals feeling she ‘didn’t want to be alive anymore' in Oprah Winfrey interview

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's highly anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey dropped several bombshells regarding the couple's exit from the royal family.

In the wide-ranging interview aired Sunday, Harry and Meghan described painful palace discussions about the color of their son’s skin, losing royal protection and the intense pressures that led the Duchess of Sussex to contemplate suicide.

The interview with Winfrey was the couple’s first since they stepped down from royal duties and the two-hour special included numerous revelations likely to reverberate on both sides of the Atlantic.

Harry told Winfrey that he felt trapped by royal life and was surprised that he was cut off financially and lost his security last year. He also said he felt his family did not support Meghan, who acknowledged her naivete about royal life before marrying Harry, as she endured tabloid attacks and false stories.

"I went to it naively because I didn't grow up watching the royal family," Meghan said. "It wasn’t something that was part of conversation at home. It wasn’t something that we followed."

Meghan said she and Harry were aligned during their courtship because of their "cause-driven" work. But she did not fully comprehend the pressure of being linked to the prestigious royal family.

"There was no way to understand what the day-to-day was going to be like," she said. "And it’s so different because I didn’t romanticize any element of it."

Meghan, who is biracial, alleged that when she was first pregnant with son Archie, there were "concerns and conversations about how dark his skin might be when he’s born." Markle said that she was not privy to such conversations, but that Harry was. She would not reveal who had the conversation with Harry, however, as she felt it would be too "damaging" to do so.

Meghan said she soon grew concerned about her son not having a royal title because it meant he wouldn’t be provided security.

Read more:

Polk County Florida Sheriff - "You kill a policeman it means no arrest...no Miranda rights... no negotiations...nothing but as many bullets as we can shoot into you...PERIOD."


POLK COUNTY FLORIDA SHERIFF, GRADY JUDD
An illegal alien, in Polk County , Florida , who got pulled over in a routine traffic stop, ended up "executing" the deputy who stopped him. The deputy was shot eight times, including once behind his right ear at close range. Another deputy was wounded and a police dog killed.
The murderer was found hiding in a wooded area. As soon as he took a shot at the SWAT team, officers opened fire on him. They hit the guy 68 times.
Naturally, the media went nuts and asked why they had to shoot the poor, undocumented immigrant 68 times.
Sheriff Grady Judd told the Orlando Sentinel: "Because that's all the ammunition we had."
Now, is that just about the all-time greatest answer or what??
The Coroner also reported that the illegal alien died of natural causes. When asked by a reporter how that could be, since there were 68 bullet wounds in his body, he simply replied: . .."When you are shot 68 times you are naturally gonna die."

[image not available]

People have a lot of different opinions about the events of January 6th, 2021 at The Capitol in Washington DC. But who better to give an insider perspective than the person who was the Chief of Capitol Police at the time? I highly recommend watching this interview. We still have not got the full truth from January 6th and what happened around it. The January 6th Committee commissioned by Democrats deemed various questions and people off limits. Watch, share, and never stop being curious.

You can watch the interview on Twitter or on Rumble

A dollar a gallon anywhere today? Yeah right. In your dreams. Liar.

This isn't a comparison, just addressing lies from blind demonrats.


I think all of the Biden supporters are happy about this never before seen price of fuel.

They must all be rich and never get affected by it. I am not going anywhere anymore because a full tank of my car costs me over a hundred bucks. Yikes.

I'm not comparing the price from last week or month but during the last administration and today.