Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

I know Sky.....but the rumors are being posted.....at guess where?

Huffington Post .......by far left and liberal bloggers. Which

goes to question thier abilities to understand politics and the

implications of decisions made by leaders.

If Obama was made the VP change, he would be putting the noose

around his neck at this point. Open himself up for attack on those

areas...leadership...political opportuntist....decision making. He a

smart man, so the change is out.

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

I have heard that as well....when the Rolling Tide or the War Eagles...take to the field......that many a woman in Alabama have had the vapors or have fainted.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

For you, Crotalas, I will add in the element of Iranian Islamic faith of its leaders and controlling Mullahs. Let us see if you feel more confrontable after reading it.

President Ahmadinejad was an orphan. He grew up in a mosque outside of Tehran, by the name of the 'Mosque of the 12 Domes'.

The Mosques of the 12 Domes preached and practices a radical kind of Islam. It does not believe in a direct connection to the Mohammed as Diety. But rather thru a 17th Century Islamic proffet that preached some very radical things.

The main tendants of his beliefs and the beliefs of the Mosque of 12 Domes are:

1) That he would return to Earth after his death during a time of great 'tribulation' to take the true believers of this faith to Paradise.

2) Other Islamic faiths were apolistics to this (e.g. fake)

3) That this tribulation would focused around the country of Iran

So? Does President Ahmadinejad still hold to this?

His main advisory group are the Mullahs of this Mosque of the 12 Domes. After his first appearance at the UN, he made a late nite meeting with them to discuss the speach he gave at the UN.
He has regularly scheduled meetings with them.

So....assume he does adhere to this form of Islam......here is a man that can with nuclear weapons.....make a tribulation around Iran occur.
Because surely when that launch is made or a terrorist device detonates in the world.....Iran is going to have some tribulation coming it way.

Still want to give him nuclear device?

When I said earlier that to me this was a 50/50 deal that Iran would
use them. This is what I was referring to. He has a extreme faith that
would give him a basis to use them for a religous cause. Not for the defense of his country, but purely for this religous faith. He belongs to a Islamic cult, Crotulas, as near as I can ascertain.

That Iran would give other Islamic countries nuclear materials, device, and processes....make sense does it not? If you want to export radical
revolutionary Islam, what better way to do it?

Do you really think that nuclear materials, processes, and devices come from God? That President says that they do.....ought to tell you that he is about 1/3 short of a full playing deck. Einstien, Oppenhiemer,
and many others brought nuclear fission and nuclear processes into the world. Claiming that they are 'God given' is like saying God also gave us things that would kill us. The God I know, does not do such things. Nuclear materials and devices are of man and his work....not of God. But return to my comments on Ahmedinejad faith.....understand how he can say they are?

Lastly Crotulas.....you got him saying.....that Isreal is a useless blot in the Islamic world and someone is going to remove it. He has said it many ways and many times.....nuclear weapons give him a means to do it.

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

The word on the internet rumor mill....is that Joe Biden will soon be replaced by Hillary Clinton. If so..............

We can see that Barak Obama......is....... one of choices here.

1) A practical man that can admit a mistake was made in choosing Biden and not Clinton in the first place

2) A indecisive leader that cannot get even his most important position
in his Administration right

3) A political opportunist that realizes that with Sarah Plain on the
REP ticket he needs to counter balance it

4) Hurting in a big way. All of the above.


Here is his problem....the ballots for the Nov 4th election.......about
200,000,000 of them. Will soon be at the printers office. With the
DEM ticket of Obama/Biden to be printed on them.

So he waits several weeks to make the change.....it will cost his campaign big time as the state will ask him to pick the printing
bill for the change. Ballots are not inexpensive ... heavy stock.....special inks to go thru the scanners....

And is it fair to add Hillary? The American people have not vetted her
for the VP role. She ran for President to get the support of the 18
million DEMs. They discussed the super dream team ticket of Obama and Clinton for months......and could not put it togther. Both rejected it.

With Biden saying.....Hillary is better qualified for the role than himself......I can understand how Barak might want to do one of the biggest political flips in all time. But really Barak......you ran against her for months, your supporters degraded her and Bill, you were able to
play the race card on them.......now make her the VP canidate?

Ah yes....change for America that we all can count on......one flip to the next and nothing solid in between them.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

^
Isreal was founded on a British decree. Those in the original Isreal gov't.....Begin, Dylan, Mier, and others came from many backgrounds.
Some were military, teachers, doctors......but I doubt any had the
term terrorist on thier resume'.

Yes the first act of "modern terrorism" occured when a Isreali bomb detonated in the British police station prior to Isreal as a country.

Begin once talked abut it......40 years later. He was part of a Mossad unit at the time. Not his unit that did it. But one he knew. He wished that they never did it. That it was mistake.

As for Ireland providing a airbase for US Aircraft to land on. We appreciate that. But only of a percentage of those aircraft head on to Iraq and the middle east. A good percentage go to Europe and will be there to face Russia if need be.

Eventually your Ireland will be faced with a Iranian missile with a nuc that can reach that airbase that US aircraft operate from. How close did you say the Airbase is to Belfast? or Dublin? Know you understand.

It is not just Isreal, and the US forces in the middle east, and a military base in eastern Europe that are the present potential targets of a
Iranian missile. Iran has the ability independantly to have ICBMs.
She already tried to launch a small satellite, a few months ago. Global tragetting of any city in the world. She has all the necessary propellants, chemicals, metals, and other materials inside Iran to have them. She does not need Russia for them. Getting the designs and technologies....only shortens the time to have them. But she can do it alone.

So? 2115..or 2020....like the idea of Iran targeting the Irish airbase where the US has a multi year operational contract with? Of course not. Nor do the people of Paris. Or Berlin. Or Prague like the idea of
Iran targetting them....because of a US presence or thier relationship with Isreal.

Just my opinion.....a Iran with nucs.....because of both a terrorist delivery and her missiles with increasing ranges.......is something that
world needs to avoid.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

^
Faith another time and another post., Crotalus. In my opinion, faith in God or knowing that God is faithful is a good thing.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

^
Irish are where? Iraq? Afghanistan? Under the threat of Iran nucs?
We are not talking about trusting individuals. But Nation States......
Iran has a 40 year history of exporting radicial and revolutionary Islam with violence.

I mentioned only a few examples. So why I wish to give a country with such a history the benefit of the doubt with nuclear weapons? I don't nor do many Americans. Ship it the only on that I know would trust Iran with nuc not to make a first strike.

I ask simple yes and no questions. With history as I know it, as a quide. Answer the questions honestly......and you can understand where I am on this.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

Total trust that Iran would not use Nuc first? Any evidence to this Ship? or just wishful thinking? Or just trying to win an arguement?

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

OK please explain to me....how religion....make it either Christian or Moslem....fits into this discussion. It does not.

If government leaders were lead by thier faith....the world would be a
far better place. But faith is one of those things that is God given.

A nuclear device....having slept on them for a time....is a device, it has no soul, no feeling, no other purpose than bringing a fissioned chain reaction together in a massive fire ball of force and destruction.

Wjem I used the word earlier 'restraint'...I was not kidding. To keep the cold war from going hot.....and it did more than once or the Cuban missile crisis.....the two side had to fear each other ability to destroy the other.....this nuclear detterance....was also a knowledge of what the other intents and abilities were.....this was the cold war arms race. This was very calculated work of many intelligence agencies.

The reason we don't trust Iran....is we are clueless to it intents. It grows its nuclear delivery means with new weapon systems. It keeps
the IEAU from inspecting its facilities. And verbally it assualts the US/Isreal/Europe.

So why should Iran have a few nucs? So we can hope that it will not use them?

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

Ship, I don't care what GWB called them 8 years ago. A Iran with a nuc. Is an Iran that can place a nuc in NYC or Tampa or LA.
While it is more likely that nuc would go to Telvia or Isreal......why in the world let them have it?

Just for middle east nuclear deterance? Ain't going to happen....we have argued it in the past.

Iran with a nuc...is a Suadi that want them to. Is a Egypt that wants them. Is a even a Iraq that wants them.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

These countries have their nukes some for nearly 60 years now. Have they ever done a terrorist type mission with them.....while having fully the ability to conduct one? No

Isreal could have for a number of years and did not. During the Palestine Infahadad.....think what if Isreal said to Hamas....we have smuggle nucs in Damacus, Tehran, Alexandria...sitting on top of them is a dedicated Mossad team. Either you stop the bombing of innocent Isreal civilians and this infahadad....or we start taking out a major Islamic city one at a time till you do. Isreal did not do that. Agreed?

It is called nuclear terrorism. Substitute Iran for Isreal.......

Wish to tell me that you know beyond beyond a shadow of a doubt
that Iran would not do it?

It is a question of trust. After seeing our embassy taken. Seeing our Marines on a peace keeping mission to your Beruit, bombed. Seeing Iran's involved elsewhere and Iraq. We simply don't trust them.

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

FBI just announced investigations into the Fannie, Lethamn Bro, and AIG. Preliminary at this point.....looking for fraud and at the management group wrong doings.applause yay thumbs up

Go get them G-Men......

I see the shreaders at the Fannies, Lethman Bro, and AIG working over time now. Flushing of emails systems. And some management
types wishing that they were still on the top floor, instead of taking the Limos home.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

Practice makes perfect Indy. President A come to the country three or more times, I have it down pat.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

Remember 9/11? A terrorist smuggled nuc into a European or American city makes it like a day in the park. Estimate death here....
is most major cities with with a 5 kilo ton device.....400,000+ deaths.

Is that a problem?

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

Then sky, you should be supporting McCain/Palin. Palin is the totally new face to Washington. Biden has been there longer than McCain and in Obama, we know has all the habits of those that have been there.

Iranian President Ahmadinejad at the UN......

America has graceously welcome Iranian President Ahmadinejad to it shores and to addressing the UN, again. And a few of his comments merit both posting and some debate.

Source: Iran prez: Bullying powers try to halt nuke plan

assembly

A few quotes to kick off.

"A few bully powers have sought to put hurdles in the way of the peaceful nuclear activities of the Iranian nation by exerting political and economic pressure against Iran and also through threatening and pressuring the IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog."

The US and NATO are the agressor in Iraq and Afghanistan and started those wars to win votes in elections.

"American empire in the world is reaching the end of the road, and its next rulers must limit their interference to thier own land."

"The zionists regime is on a definite slope to collapse." And there is no way for it to get out of the cesspool made by itself and supporters."

speaking of Iraq..."Millions have been killed or displaced, and the occupiers, without a sense of shame are still seeking to soildify thier position in the region and to dominate oil resources."

This reminds me much of another poster here at CS and the thread topics developed there......no names to keep them innocent till proven quilty....that is a joke Dude.

I going to address each one individually and we can turn to discussion.
And ask a question on the one that the most merit in my opinion to discuss.

Iran has been sanction 3 times by the UN Security Council....sitting on that council is not only the major world powers China, Russia, US, UK, France but 7 other countries choosen from the General Assembly. Seems like more than just a few bully power have problems with Iran's nuclear programs. Including all most all of Europe....that also has sanction on Iran.

The US went to Afghanistan to win vote for an Election. We were in Afghanistan a few months after 9/11 2001......with no election with 1 year's time. The US entry into Iraq was spring time of 2002, the mid term, non Presidential election was the fall of that year.

The next is the one wish to ask the question on. Does the world really want America to stay within its borders? Militarily? Economically? Humanitarian? Understand that our military also does humantarian work. So say.....keep our ships at home.....that cyclone aid to Mynmar and those helo in the Pakistani earthquakes will not be deployed in time to aid. Does the world want us to stop sending tourists, educators, business abroad? That seems to be the gist of President Ahmeadinejad thoughts here.

Here is my comment. Has Iran had this same restrain the last 36 years since the Khomani returned? The Beruit Marine Barracks bombing is flet by many to be the work of Iranian agents. The killing of the Lebanon PM another act of Iranian and Syrian agent. Recently IEDs in Iraq have been found to be made in Iran. There is a long list of Iran...not having the restraint in pursueing it goals to export Revolutionary Islam.

Seems to me if there is a cesspool in Isreal, the Iranian have helped to make it there. Yesterday they had a Palestine drive his BMW into a
group of Isreali military. Prior a Palestine use a large construction vehicle to attack Isreali civilians. Iran supports both Hamas and Hezbollah with funding and other resources. Iran helped to make Isreal what it is.

Iraq.....yes there has been death in Iraq. Alot of it is with the indiscriminate death of land mine, mortars, IEDs, lob bombs, and other weapons that Iran has helped to put there.

Done with the OP.....thoughts?

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

Sky they all take it. They only reason that Obama has so little record of it. Is his length in the Senate. That he took either $295K or $560K
(I have seen both figures) from the Fannies....says what?

Tells me that while he wishes to say.....hey the rest of you all (Congress)....are the reason Washington is broken.....you take money from PACs, Wall Street, Def. Contractors....opps.....let me open my pocket a little wider, Fannies while you put more in.

It gets pretty hypocritical Sky. I going to fix a broken Washington, while I stuff my pocket with funds.

Has McCain taken money from PACs, Fannies, and the others?
Yep......each and every elected official in DC has. Being there 22 years just means that you can find more record of it. He is not hiding it or you would not find it in public online searches.

But whether you take $1 or a million, the ethics of it is the same.

To tell us that Obama is anything different......because in 2 years time.....he has only tapped the system to a smaller dollar figure. Does not tell me that his ethics are any better than McCains. If he is there for 20 more years.......and you do a search on Obama contributers then.......and you will find them from sources and locations....that would have the founding fathers turning in their graves.

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

sky, what about the investigations on 9/11, Katrina, the Shuttle accident, and congressional hearings on Iraq and Afghanistan?

What I have posted...is that they have had habit of doing investigations......and know with this they don't. GWB and the
administration broke the habit of doing investigations AND Congress is as well.

For GWB it goes a little bit further. When someone has messed up in his Adminstration. GWB fires him.

Gen Sanchez......Ambassador Bremmer......Gen. Wagnor.....the 7
Federal Attroneys....... the Head of NASA....Sect of Def. Rumsfield.....all got the axe after it went wrong on their watch.

It goes wrong for the 4-5 major US Corp.....with a number looking to
be in the same position soon.....and the SEC Chairman has the 'full confidence of the President? And GWB is not asking for a investigation?

Good Adminstrations and Congresses have consistancy. Here both GWB and Congress are breaking with thier past decisions and habits.

Newt Grinrich....a guy that understands DC....said the samething. That is hasty, is ill concieved, that it is likely to set a horrible prescendent, and is a major mistake to do the economic redo.

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

That definitely knocks a sox off, Twinkles

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

I have to admit....it is sorely missing from the list.
Maybe the author own a shoe store?

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

I have to admit....there is theat moment during a game....when it is 4th and inches for a TD........and to have someone ask......."What does the man in the striped shirt do?".....does become less than welcomed.

But try it...again. Maybe the guy......will be a student of the game.....and explain it better to you.

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

Hugs, you just need the guy that can not only talk a good game, but can enjoy you while he does.

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

Not a true football (or fotbol) lover, SirenLydia.....they are always up for talking about the game......how they mange win a tight one.

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

See hugs...you already got one sox knocked off!!

Things You'll Problably Never Hear a Waomn Say

Before you shoot the messager (e.g. me)...this was in our local weekly magazine.

Unknown to if man or female author. If a man and his significant other
found it on his computer/desk......I know of some good local hotels and
restraunts to enjoy in the near future.

But here they are, things you will likely never hear a woman say:

-You know I've been complaining a lot laterly. I don't blame you for
ignoring me.

-While you were in the bathroom, they went for it on fourth down and missed. If they can hold them to a field goal, they will still cover the spread.

-I liked that wedding even more than ours. Your ex girlfriend has class.

-That girl is wearing my same outfit as mine. Cool, I am going over and talk with her.

-Let's just leave the toilet seat "up" all the times, then you do have to mess with it.

-It's only the 3rd quarter, you should order a couple more pitcher.

-My mother is going to pick up the tab, so order another round for
you and your friends.

-I'm so happy with my new hairstyle, I don't think that I will ever change it again.

-You are so much smarter than my father.

-Are you sure that you have had enough to drink?

-I'd much rather watch football and drink beer with you than go shopping.

-I'll be out painting the house.

-I love it when you ride your Harley, I just wish you had more time to ride.

-No, no. I will take the car to have the oil changed.

-Your mother is better than mine.

-Listen, I make enough money for the both of us. Why don't you retire?

-You need your sleep ya big silly. Now stop getting up for the mightly feeding.

Obviously the writer is a man. That was delusional after a long night of binge drinking with his buddies. And the offer still holds, if his signifacant other did find this list. Because I have a feeling he will need someone to put him up and to share a meal with in the near future.

But honestly ladies.....want to knock a guy's sox off sometime.....try a couple when they seem to fit.

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

Agman, do you think that Obama's position of sitting back and agreeing with GWB is the right one? That is where he and the
DEMs are on the economic redo. With the exception of a few.

Obama is sitting there.....watching the blood on wall street.....
making political hay of it, saying it is McCain fault ....one of his
supporters took it there.....

Obama going to be able to thrust forth his hand......and have
the water calm on this? Agman, you are smarter than that.
And most DEMs are too.

They see that political contribution from Wall Street ends up
in DEM and REP pocket. They see DEM being investigated on
bad loans from mortage companies.....firms that they regulate.
They know the earmark game that both play.

Obama and the DEMs at this point should be screaming for a
investigation, post Katrina, post Challenger, post Iraq......that
is what the out of power party does to get ammo on the party
in power.

Send Senator Bunning a note on why he wants to flibuster it.
He will tell you. It has not been investigated. McCain is right there
as well.....saying don't jump off a clift untill you know a safety
net or a inflated air bag is there for you to land on. That is those
that favor an investigation are asking for.

One of the major Wall Streetor is saying.....this is a one time
affair......oh yes.....why should WE believe that? Because a
guy from Wall Street says it???....you own stocks....how many times
has your broker said this is a great deal.....guarrenteed to go
up in value.......and then you saw it tank or flat line? Eventually
if like most, you got tired of that.....said I will do my own research
(investigation) and buy direct myself and save the commission.

I don't know..... it is only money....a lot.....so there are worse in life to happen. One thing that is sure. If the $700b is not enough.....the
next Administration...be it McCain's or Obama's will be asked to do it
again. One is saying now....investigate. The other is saying write the
check.

Leahman Brothers Bankrupcty and AIG Bailout........

Maybe should prime the pump at both ends and the middle. Inject funds into small and family own business (e.g. the middle) some at the top....to releive AIG, GM, Fannies, etc.......and some at the bottom
with education grants and work enhancement programs for unemployed and laid off.

But without that economic investigation.......we are flying in the dark.....ever run into a mountain while flying in the dark? Very bad for your health. Not many live to tell about the expereince.

RE: Charlie Gibson interviews of Obama and Palin~

To get 60,000 Floridans together for anything other than a football game.....is an indication....that Palin is more than a 'want to be' or 'Johnny come lately'.

People want to hear the her story.....

If the DEM keep the attacks coming....and not show the respect that these kind of crouds should bring? Not smart.

RE: McCain: "The fish love to be around those rigs"

Shifting to Obama.......more on the Obama/Ayers relationship.

It began in 1995. First to guess for what purpose?

To aid in setting up community organizers programs

Yep, ACORN again. I am beginning to think that ACRORN was a Bill Ayers idea.

Then Ayers throws the kickoff party for Obama's run for IL Senate at his house.

Obama is elected.

1997. They worked to stop a teen crime bill in the IL Senate

Obama was later a founding partner to the Wood's Foundation, that
Ayers was the CEO of. In setting up a foundation, there is a lot of
contact between the CEO and founding partners as the business model, goals, means, organization, by-laws are set up. It is normally is a daily thing for several months.

Obama has been saying that Ayers was 'just this guy that he met in the Richard Daily Chicago Administration involved in education.'

Anyone wish to consider that Obama might be whitewashing the Ayers relationship into making it a just a occassional association?

Also I am beginning to think that Michelle Obama might have had a relationship with Dorn.....Dorn is Ayers accomplist in the weathermen bombings. Dorn has always been in the background of the Ayers affairs. She still attends his political meeting and does interviews with him.

By making Michelle hands off, Obama keeps her from being vetted for relationships like this. If she has them......they remain out the press.
And no one is looking for them.

RE: McCain: "The fish love to be around those rigs"

Landed on a aircraft carrier with a mission accomplished banner? :-)

A serious reply, here now Ship.

Islamic terrorism has a long history, yes? Much has been based in the 70s/80s/early 90s in the Med and Persian Gulf region.....over the
Isreal/Palenstine conflict. If your plan to go after terrorism is just
limited to those that did 9/11........then you really have not done much to the bigger picture of terrorism that is wide spread geographically into the Med, the Persian Gulf, and N. Africa.

If all we did was go to Afghanistan and hunt bin Laden and AlQeada, then all the rest would keep occurring.......

After 9/11 Ship, you saw the impact in the Moslem street to the events of that day. Bin Laden and AlQeada were going to have big influx of people, funds, and resources from all over the Moslem world. Islamic militia groups like Hamas and Hezbollah grew in size. Iran's power base within them grew as well.

A key point, Ship. The Russian/Afghan conflict of the 80s. bin Laden's
911 Brigade.......only had 5,000 foreign fighters in it. That is it. All these that were going to coming into the fray because of 9/11 were coming from other points. 1/2 of Alqeada 70,000 trainee had been sent out Afghanistan by 9/11 to 40 countries. They were not coming
back to Afghanistan.

We needed to make contact with them (both the new parties and the those that been sent out of Ahganistan)....with our military. That is what a 'vector' fight is. You find a place where they will come to you.
Where? Iraq. GWB says he can kill three birds with one stone.

Take out Sadam a nasty a guy as if there ever is one.....with the potential to source terrorism. Isolate Iran the world's leading exporter of revolutionary Islam.....and make contact with these foreign fighters of AlQeada and the newbies from 9/11 that have an itch to strike at America.

They pored into Iraq in 2004/5, Ship. One eye team near Tal Afar, Iraq
said they would see 400-500 a night crossing the border. That is one point along a 200+ mile border.

Has it worked? I don't know. Still in the process there. We have 69,000 detained in Iraqi jails. A large % are foreign fighters that the Iraqi have been giving up. They came from some 18 different countries. But as I have said in other posts.....the only time Hamas or Hezbollah talk to Isreal....is when Isreal holds a number of them in prisons. We got them talking and we hold the keys to the jails, Ship. Alot better than the other way around. Key your fingers crossed for a good out come on the talks. They have been at the tables for nearly two months now.......how often has that happened in the past?

Think that we would get Hamas, Hezbollah and Syria talking to Isreal.....just by chasing bin Laden in Afghanistan/Pakistan? I don't think so. Pressure Iran on its nuclear programs....by only being in Afghanistan? Again, I don't. It is a bigger issue than bin Laden and AlQeada, Ship. Iraq was our best option on a bigger issue solution.

Not a prefect one...or one that got explained well.....you don't tell
your enemy you are laying a trap for them......but one that has the possiblity still to solve many of the world's terrorism issues.jmo

Last time I post of this here at CS

This is a list of forum posts created by ttom500.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here